Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7

2003-09-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:30:21PM -0400, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
 I've got new whois packages (4.6.7) ready for upload.  The URL is
 http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/.

Please always send the full URLs to the files to upload.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.


Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE]: gnupg-1.2.2-3

2003-09-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 07:02:28PM +0200, Volker Quetschke wrote:
 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/gnupg/setup.hint
 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/gnupg/gnupg-1.2.2-3.tar.bz2
 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/gnupg/gnupg-1.2.2-3-src.tar.bz2

Uploaded.  I deleted 1.2.1-1 and 1.2.2-2.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.


License restrictions? (graphviz)

2003-09-22 Thread Gareth Pearce

  doxygen Ryunosuke Satoh
 
 I just want to point out, that the astyle maintainer also has the
 ownership of doxygen. The doxygen version does not work correctly on text
 mounts and Ryunosuke confirmed me this lastly (after some private email
 conversation 1 year ago), but he neither build a version with corrected
 open modes nor did he update doxygen to the current version 1.3.x (where x
 is meanwhile 3). So I suppose that doxygen is abandonned too.

Doxygen chatter made me remember something I was interested in maintaining. 
Graphviz, which is the source of the 'dot' program which doxygen can use to
produce some very nice inheritance diagrams.

I guess the main issue I wondered about was whether the att 'open source'
licence used is compatible with the practicalities and ethos of the
setup.exe distribution.  Its distributed as part of debian 'non-free' so I
imagine it can't be too bad, but I'm not one to understand legalize all that
well.

Regards,
Gareth

For reference:
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/license/index.html
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/download.html



Re: -bin packages?

2003-09-22 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
I think that it some cases it may be needed and solve some packaging problems - 
I believe tetex is one of those cases (hence, IMHO, it should not be forbidden
to do so). OTOH, even though most people will not be interested in the binaries
in the pcre package (pcregrep and pcretest) I don't think this warrants making
a non-standard pcre-bin package..

IOW, I think exceptions should be possible if warranted. Whether or not aspell
and XFree warrant the exception is up to their maintainers to ponder..

JMO (Just My Opinion)

rlc

On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:21:33AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
 I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people
 do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of
 naming the binary 'aspell-bin'.  I'd like to change that.  Otherwise
 we have a base package which only contains source, which is also
 unusual.  I'd prefer to mv aspell-{bin-,}0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 and
 put it at the top level of the aspell directory and move everything else
 underneath it.
 
 Gareth, do you have a problem with that?
 
 I just re-noticed that tetex also has a -bin package.
 
 What do people think about this?  I would like to be consistent in package
 naming and it seems like most packages put their binaries in a package sans
 -bin.  There is an empty tetex package but I don't understand the need
 to complicate things this way.
 
 XFree86 also does this and I am, again, not sure why it's needed.
 
 cgf

-- 
This is a job for BOB VIOLENCE and SCUM, the INCREDIBLY STUPID MUTANT DOG.
-- Bob Violence


RE: License restrictions? (graphviz)

2003-09-22 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Gareth,

Gareth Pearce wrote on Monday, September 22, 2003 10:44 AM:
 Doxygen chatter made me remember something I was interested
 in maintaining.
 Graphviz, which is the source of the 'dot' program which
 doxygen can use to produce some very nice inheritance diagrams.
 
 I guess the main issue I wondered about was whether the att
 'open source' licence used is compatible with the
 practicalities and ethos of the setup.exe distribution.  Its
 distributed as part of debian 'non-free' so I imagine it
 can't be too bad, but I'm not one to understand legalize all that
 well. 

Graphviz is an optional part of doxygen and was not part of the Cygwin distribution 
anyway ... although it would have been usefull (apart from any licensing questions) ...

 Regards,
 Gareth
 
 For reference:
 http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/license/index.ht
ml
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/download.html


RE: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7

2003-09-22 Thread Mark Bradshaw
http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.7-1.tar.bz2
http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.7-1-src.tar.bz2

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
 Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:25 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7
 
 
 On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:30:21PM -0400, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
  I've got new whois packages (4.6.7) ready for upload.  The URL is
  http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/.
 
 Please always send the full URLs to the files to upload.
 
 Corinna
 
 -- 
 Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
 Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Red Hat, Inc.
 


Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7

2003-09-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:01:53AM -0400, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
 http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.7-1.tar.bz2
 http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.7-1-src.tar.bz2

Uploaded.  I removed 4.6.1-1.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.


Re: clisp is in section misc?

2003-09-22 Thread Sam Steingold
 * Dean Scarff q_fpness=omTV/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-20 16:12:14 +0800]:

 On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:04:01 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
 
  shells: can be your login shell (http://clisp.cons.org/clash.html)
 
 would mean that all interpreters with a system interface (perl,
 python, cint, et al) would fall into the shell category as well

Do people use perl as their login shell?
if yes, then you might be right.
there _are_ people who actually have CLISP as their login shell.

 Sorry, but devel and interpreters should be enough for clisp imho.

while the shell category is, indeed, dubious, math is not (IMO).
clisp does offer quite a few features which make it a superset of bc
(which _is_ in math).

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
http://www.camera.org http://www.iris.org.il http://www.memri.org/
http://www.mideasttruth.com/ http://www.honestreporting.com
Warning! Dates in calendar are closer than they appear!



Re: List of package owners

2003-09-22 Thread Brian Ford
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

 lesstif Harold L Hunt II
  
I believe the maintainer is actually Brian Ford (see
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-09/msg00348.html).

Well, kind of.  I guess you could call me the proxy maintainer.

Harold said he just released the initial package to get people started,
and that he wasn't interested in maintaining it.  I needed some bug fixes
from newer versions, so we struck a deal.

I provide updates to Harold on my time table and try to reasonably support
those updates.  He graciously accepts and publishes them. But, I haven't
really committed for the long haul yet.

So, I guess his name is as good as any.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444


FW: [update] base-files (was: RE: /etc/profile - futile try to predict order of execution)

2003-09-22 Thread John Morrison
(sorry, wrong list)

 -Original Message-
 From: John Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, 21 September 2003 10:25 pm
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [update] base-files (was: RE: /etc/profile - futile try to
 predict order of execution)


  Subject: RE: /etc/profile - futile try to predict order of execution

 AFAIK /etc/profile *never* tried to predict/guarentee order of
 execution.  If packages made an assumption, well you know the
 saying.

  -   `/bin/find /etc/profile.d -iname '*.sh' -type f`
  +   `/bin/find /etc/profile.d -iname '*.sh' -type f | sort`

 Fixed.

 Please upload 2.6-1

 J.


http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-files/md5sum

426b60728ae5061ab9e8e20212ef6fc6
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-files/base-fil
es-2.6-1.tar.bz2

9b2695ab19b83cc2eb27e346801a114c
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-files/setup.hi
nt