Re: [RFU 1.5] task-1.8.4-1
On Nov 18 22:17, Federico Hernandez wrote: > A new version of task has been released - a bug fix release (in > particular for cygwin). > > Please upload. Done. I fixed your setup.hint file which had an incorrect requires line requires: libncurses9, libstdc++6 Note the comma, which is not correct. There's also a dependency to libgcc1 missing. I changed the setup.hint file on sourceware to requires: libncurses9 libgcc1 libstdc++6 Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
New w32api release?
Hi Chris, is there a chance we can get a new w32api release soon? The last release is almost a year old and there were so many useful or convenient changes in the header files, that I'm missing a new release quite a lot. Thanks for considering, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [RFU 1.5] task-1.8.4-1
> requires: libncurses9, libstdc++6 > > Note the comma, which is not correct. There's also a dependency to Thank you for the comma fix. Brain was thinking on something else probably. > libgcc1 missing. I changed the setup.hint file on sourceware to > > requires: libncurses9 libgcc1 libstdc++6 Ok, I thought that since libstdc++6 was already depending on libgcc1 I wouldn't need to specify it explicitly. I should have asked. THX, /Federico
Re: [RFU 1.5] task-1.8.4-1
On Nov 19 10:20, Federico Hernandez wrote: > > requires: libncurses9 libgcc1 libstdc++6 > > Ok, I thought that since libstdc++6 was already depending on libgcc1 I > wouldn't need to specify it explicitly. I should have asked. Hmm, you were probably right. The libgcc1 dependency was not actually necessary, given the libstdc++6 dependency. Sorry, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: New w32api release?
Hi Corrina, > is there a chance we can get a new w32api release soon? The last > release is almost a year old and there were so many useful or convenient > changes in the header files, that I'm missing a new release quite a lot. Sorry, I know you requested a new release a while back. I am in the process of following up on the w32api patches and bug reports in the MinGW tracker. I've been slowed a little due to being unable to do CVS commits (can't commit through the various firewalls I've been behind this week), but I will be home this weekend and should be in a position to commit the outstanding patches. That being the case, my goal is to roll out a new release on Monday. Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org
Re: New w32api release?
On Nov 19 07:58, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > Hi Corrina, s/rrin/rinn/ > That being the case, my > goal is to roll out a new release on Monday. That would be nice. Thank you, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: New w32api release?
Hi Corinna, > s/rrin/rinn/ Ugh... I did it again... sorry about that. Cheers, Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org
Re: ITP: libustr
Charles Wilson wrote: > cygwin-1.5 > http://cygwin.cwilson.fastmail.fm/ITP/libustr-1.0.4-2.dist.tar > > cygwin-1.7 > http://cygwin.cwilson.fastmail.fm/ITP/libustr-1.0.4-11.dist.tar Can I get a GTG on the revised package? -- Chuck
Re: ITP: libustr
On 16/11/2009 01:57, Charles Wilson wrote: Thanks for the review. How's this: Looks fine to me. Yaakov
