Re: [RFU] socat
On Oct 22 09:28, Andrew Schulman wrote: Correction: Could you please remove version 1.7.1.1-1 from the archive, and uploaded the revised setup.hint file? 1.7.1.1 had a security vulnerability. The revised setup.hint removes it as the prev version. Thanks, Andrew. wget http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/socat/setup.hint Done. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [RFU] smartmontools-5.42-1
On Oct 22 16:50, Christian Franke wrote: New upstream release wget \ http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/release/smartmontools/smartmontools-5.42-1.tar.bz2 \ http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/release/smartmontools/smartmontools-5.42-1-src.tar.bz2 setup.hint is unchanged. Please remove 5.40-1 and keep 5.41-1 as prev. Done. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
[RFU] subversion-1.7.1-1
Please delete 1.6.16-1 and leave 1.6.17-1 and 1.7.0-1. Thanks! wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-1.7.1-1-src.tar.bz2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-1.7.1-1.tar.bz2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-apache2/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-apache2/subversion-apache2-1.7.1-1.tar.bz2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-devel/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-devel/subversion-devel-1.7.1-1.tar.bz2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-perl/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-perl/subversion-perl-1.7.1-1.tar.bz2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-python/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-python/subversion-python-1.7.1-1.tar.bz2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-ruby/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-ruby/subversion-ruby-1.7.1-1.tar.bz2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-tools/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-tools/subversion-tools-1.7.1-1.tar.bz2 -- David Rothenberger daver...@acm.org Mitchell's Law of Committees: Any simple problem can be made insoluble if enough meetings are held to discuss it.
lost announcements
This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. Two of them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't shown up yet. Meanwhile, other later announcements have been posted. Are the missing messages held up in the queue? Anything I need to do about that? Or, should I resend them? Thanks, Andrew.
Re: lost announcements
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. Two of them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't shown up yet. Meanwhile, other later announcements have been posted. Are the missing messages held up in the queue? Anything I need to do about that? Or, should I resend them? Thanks, Andrew. I have received them, and they both show in the web: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2011-10/msg00036.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2011-10/msg00035.html -- Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179 60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: lost announcements
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. Two of them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't shown up yet. Meanwhile, other later announcements have been posted. Are the missing messages held up in the queue? Anything I need to do about that? Or, should I resend them? I have received them, and they both show in the web: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2011-10/msg00036.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2011-10/msg00035.html Hm, you're right. But the odd thing is that they weren't posted to the cygwin list, which is where I read them: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/. Any idea why? Thanks, Andrew.
Re: lost announcements
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:20:52PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. Two of them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't shown up yet. Meanwhile, other later announcements have been posted. Are the missing messages held up in the queue? Anything I need to do about that? Or, should I resend them? I have received them, and they both show in the web: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2011-10/msg00036.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2011-10/msg00035.html Hm, you're right. But the odd thing is that they weren't posted to the cygwin list, which is where I read them: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/. Any idea why? Nope. And I'm afraid I can't help there. -- Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179 60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: lost announcements
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:20:52PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. Two of them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't shown up yet. Meanwhile, other later announcements have been posted. Are the missing messages held up in the queue? Anything I need to do about that? Or, should I resend them? I have received them, and they both show in the web: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2011-10/msg00036.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2011-10/msg00035.html Hm, you're right. But the odd thing is that they weren't posted to the cygwin list, which is where I read them: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/. Any idea why? Embedded email address. cgf
