Re: [ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1
On Oct 10 23:55, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 11:09 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Oct 10 10:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Oct 9 22:48, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > > > Perhaps a solution is for cygwin/in.h to #define s_addr s_addr to > > > > trigger inaddr.h's include guard? > > > > > > Will do. But that only helps in your case after we updated to the next > > > Cygwin version. I guess you already added such a #define to the bind > > > code? > > > > Can you check if my patch to cygwin/in.h works for you? > > WFM. Thanks for testing. > > Other than that, was there any other roadblock on the way to the Mingw64 > > headers? > > I think there's still one issue wrt xorg-server; I need to check that > again. Ok. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: RFU: keychain 2.7.1-1 (ITA: new maintainer)
On Oct 10 20:52, David Sastre Medina wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:00:04AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Oct 10 08:44, Jari Aalto wrote: > > > 2012-10-09 21:49 David Sastre Medina > > > | > > > | P.S. keychain (also a simple shell script) is orphaned, and there's a > > > | new version upstream, just in case you're interested. > > > > > > New upstream release: > > > > Err... hang on. This package is officially maintained by Jonathan C. > > Allen. I admit that we had no feedback from him since 2007, but it > > doesn't hurt to ask. > > > > Jonathan? Are you still with us in some way? You are still officially > > maintainer of 5 packages, bsflite, keychain, naim, ncftp and tnef. > > None of them has been update since 2007, though... > > I'm sorry. Somehow, I had the idea of keychain being orphaned already. > I tried searching the mail archives, but I could only find > this thread from some months ago: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-03/msg00082.html > > Again, I apologize. Completely unintended. No worries. I had completely forgotten the above thread. Looks like we can safely put the following packages into ORPHANED mode: apache-1.x bsflite ccdoc naim ncftp tnef Jari, I uploaded your keychain package and made you maintainer now. As for apache-1.x, I guess this should better go into OBSOLETE, shouldn't it? And then there's the "email" package, maintained by Ross Smith. Ross, you replied on 2012-03-24, but then you never updated the email package. How are things going? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: upload protocol
On Oct 10 18:46, David Stacey wrote: > On 10/10/12 10:31, Warren Young wrote: > >As it happens, I think this sort of gun-jumping happened with the > >Doxygen 1.8.0-1 packages. I gave a GTG with reservations to the > >ITP, several days ago. David said in the thread he was off > >working on addressing some of those reservations, but then > >yesterday Corinna uploaded from the ITP message. > > > >I'm not regretting my GTG. I thought the packages were at least > >no worse than my 1.7.4-1 packages that David's packages replace. > >But, I think David was expecting a second chance before sending > >the RFU. > > Yes, I was a little surprised when my doxygen package was uploaded! > I had made the changes that Warren suggested, and I sent another > [ITP] message last Thursday (4 Oct 2012): > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-10/msg00021.html > > As a newbie, I didn't know whether to wait for more comments, or to > submit a [RFU] (as I'd been given a GTG) - maybe someone would be > kind enough to clarify this. But before either could happen, the > package got uploaded anyway! But to repeat: the package that was > uploaded included the suggestions that Warren made. Sorry for having been too quick. Usually I upload what's branded GTG and since your new package was just a minor tweak I didn't see any problems. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: RFU: keychain 2.7.1-1 (ITA: new maintainer)
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 11:51 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > No worries. I had completely forgotten the above thread. Looks > like we can safely put the following packages into ORPHANED mode: > > apache-1.x > bsflite > ccdoc > naim > ncftp > tnef > > Jari, I uploaded your keychain package and made you maintainer now. > > As for apache-1.x, I guess this should better go into OBSOLETE, > shouldn't it? IMO it should be removed, as it has been EOLed upstream and is no longer receiving patches even for security vulnerabilities. Yaakov
Re: RFU: keychain 2.7.1-1 (ITA: new maintainer)
On Oct 11 11:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 11:51 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > No worries. I had completely forgotten the above thread. Looks > > like we can safely put the following packages into ORPHANED mode: > > > > apache-1.x > > bsflite > > ccdoc > > naim > > ncftp > > tnef > > > > Jari, I uploaded your keychain package and made you maintainer now. > > > > As for apache-1.x, I guess this should better go into OBSOLETE, > > shouldn't it? > > IMO it should be removed, as it has been EOLed upstream and is no longer > receiving patches even for security vulnerabilities. Done. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 23:55 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 11:09 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Other than that, was there any other roadblock on the way to the Mingw64 > > headers? > > I think there's still one issue wrt xorg-server; I need to check that > again. SVN trunk (r5430) is GTG, but AFAICS at least r5384 should do. Yaakov
Re: RFU: keychain 2.7.1-1 (ITA: new maintainer)
2012-10-11 12:51 Corinna Vinschen | > | > http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-03/msg00082.html | | ... I had completely forgotten the above thread. Looks | like we can safely put the following packages into ORPHANED mode: | | apache-1.x | bsflite | ccdoc | naim | ncftp | tnef | | Jari, I uploaded your keychain package and made you maintainer now. ACK, Jari
[RFU] yasm -- a complete rewrite of the NASM assembler
On 08/10/12 10:23, Jari Aalto wrote: On 2012-10-07 22:01, David Stacey wrote: | | yasm... Builds ok, GTG. wget --no-host-directories --force-directories --cut-dirs=1 \ http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2 \ http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-1.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2 \ http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/setup.hint \ http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-devel/yasm-devel-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2 \ http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-devel/setup.hint \ http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-debuginfo/yasm-debuginfo-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2 \ http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-debuginfo/setup.hint
Re: [RFU] yasm -- a complete rewrite of the NASM assembler
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:32:57PM +0100, David Stacey wrote: >On 08/10/12 10:23, Jari Aalto wrote: >> On 2012-10-07 22:01, David Stacey wrote: >> | >> | yasm... >> >> Builds ok, GTG. > >wget --no-host-directories --force-directories --cut-dirs=1 \ > http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2 \ > http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-1.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2 \ > http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/setup.hint \ >http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-devel/yasm-devel-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2 >\ > http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-devel/setup.hint \ >http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-debuginfo/yasm-debuginfo-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2 > >\ > http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/yasm/yasm-debuginfo/setup.hint Uploaded. cgf
