Re: [ITP] w32api r5431 [Was: Re: [ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1]
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 13:36 +0800, JonY wrote: > I decided do a simpler split out version due to the way the source package > is built, with w32api as a meta package. > If required I can redo it into a single package. > > Preference? Comments? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/setup.hint > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/w32api-libs-3.0b_svn5431-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/w32api-libs-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 I think the sdesc: is confusing. How about: sdesc: "Windows API headers" > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/setup.hint > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/w32api-includes-3.0b_svn5431-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/w32api-includes-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 sdesc: "Windows API import libraries" But wouldn't w32api-headers be a better name? Yaakov
Re: [ITP] w32api r5431 [Was: Re: [ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1]
On 10/17/2012 06:19, JonY wrote: > On 10/16/2012 23:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> Are you waiting for more feedback or shall we upload? Are you mentally >> and ethically prepared to take the loads of complaints on the Cygwin ML? >> > > It's good to go if the Cygwin maintainers are OK with split out packages > and a meta package. > > As for complaints, well, we'll see how it goes. > > I mean to say I'll try my best, within mortal limits :) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [ITP] w32api r5431 [Was: Re: [ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1]
On 10/16/2012 23:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Oct 16 18:05, JonY wrote: >> On 10/14/2012 02:12, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:28:42AM +0800, JonY wrote: > On 10/14/2012 00:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> Sounds really interesting. I just tried it, but it fails to download >> the w32api-libs and w32api-includes packages: >> >> generating package name -> package directory mapping... >> Done >> couldn't find a package dir for >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/w32api-libs-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 >> couldn't find a package dir for >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/w32api-includes-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/meta/w32api-100.0-1.tar.bz2 >> -> /sourceware/snapshot-tmp/cygwin/release/w32api/w32api-100.0-1.tar.bz2 >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/meta/w32api-100.0-1-src.tar.bz2 >> -> >> /sourceware/snapshot-tmp/cygwin/release/w32api/w32api-100.0-1-src.tar.bz2 >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/meta/setup.hint >> -> /sourceware/snapshot-tmp/cygwin/release/w32api/setup.hint >> >> >> Corinna >> > > It doesn't handle new packages? Nope. Only old packages. Should have made that clear. However, if you make the appropriate subdirectories in cygwin's release >>> ^ >>>first area it will then work. >>> >> >> Ping. > > Are you waiting for more feedback or shall we upload? Are you mentally > and ethically prepared to take the loads of complaints on the Cygwin ML? > It's good to go if the Cygwin maintainers are OK with split out packages and a meta package. As for complaints, well, we'll see how it goes. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [ITP] w32api r5431 [Was: Re: [ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1]
On Oct 16 18:05, JonY wrote: > On 10/14/2012 02:12, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:28:42AM +0800, JonY wrote: > >>> On 10/14/2012 00:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Sounds really interesting. I just tried it, but it fails to download > the w32api-libs and w32api-includes packages: > > generating package name -> package directory mapping... > Done > couldn't find a package dir for > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/w32api-libs-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 > couldn't find a package dir for > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/w32api-includes-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/meta/w32api-100.0-1.tar.bz2 > -> /sourceware/snapshot-tmp/cygwin/release/w32api/w32api-100.0-1.tar.bz2 > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/meta/w32api-100.0-1-src.tar.bz2 > -> > /sourceware/snapshot-tmp/cygwin/release/w32api/w32api-100.0-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/meta/setup.hint > -> /sourceware/snapshot-tmp/cygwin/release/w32api/setup.hint > > > Corinna > > >>> > >>> It doesn't handle new packages? > >> > >> Nope. Only old packages. Should have made that clear. > >> > >> However, if you make the appropriate subdirectories in cygwin's release > > ^ > >first > >> area it will then work. > > > > Ping. Are you waiting for more feedback or shall we upload? Are you mentally and ethically prepared to take the loads of complaints on the Cygwin ML? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [ITP] w32api r5431 [Was: Re: [ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1]
On 10/14/2012 02:12, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:28:42AM +0800, JonY wrote: >>> On 10/14/2012 00:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Sounds really interesting. I just tried it, but it fails to download the w32api-libs and w32api-includes packages: generating package name -> package directory mapping... Done couldn't find a package dir for http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/w32api-libs-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 couldn't find a package dir for http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/w32api-includes-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/meta/w32api-100.0-1.tar.bz2 -> /sourceware/snapshot-tmp/cygwin/release/w32api/w32api-100.0-1.tar.bz2 http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/meta/w32api-100.0-1-src.tar.bz2 -> /sourceware/snapshot-tmp/cygwin/release/w32api/w32api-100.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/meta/setup.hint -> /sourceware/snapshot-tmp/cygwin/release/w32api/setup.hint Corinna >>> >>> It doesn't handle new packages? >> >> Nope. Only old packages. Should have made that clear. >> >> However, if you make the appropriate subdirectories in cygwin's release > ^ >first >> area it will then work. > Ping. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mosh
Hi Reini, Did you miss this thread on the Cygwin ML, by any chance? Is it ok to make mosh 1.2.2-2 current? On Oct 3 08:56, Sean Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Simon Barnes wrote: > > The experimental mosh package, version 1.2.2-2, works very well while the > > "current" package 1.2.2-1 does not. Would it be possible to promote > > 1.2.2-2 to current? > > > > Thanks > > Simon > > [...] > > I concur. The experimental version "just works", while the current > version would not, even after research and mashing of the keyboard. > > Thank you, > Sean P Murphy Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
