Re: [ITP] autoconf2.7
Achim Gratz writes: > As discussed in another thread, Cygwin should have an autoconf2.7 > package going forward. It builds just out of the box, so here's the ITP > for it. https://cygwin.com/git-cygwin-packages/?p=git/cygwin-packages/autoconf2.7.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/playground https://ci.appveyor.com/project/cygwin/scallywag/builds/41765733/job/3xds3v63e29q9i6b Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra
Re: [ITP] autoconf2.7
ASSI writes:
> Hmm. That looks wrong, the Gentoo folks rolled both 2.70 and 2.71 into
> the WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5 category (which likely works for them). So yay,
> I'll have to patch that.
https://cygwin.com/git-cygwin-packages/?p=git/cygwin-packages/autoconf.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/playground
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/cygwin/scallywag/builds/41765363/job/2pix82o872hjofj9
This will also simplify that cygport autotools patch to (default
autoconf is still 2.69 for the moment):
--- /usr/share/cygport/cygclass/autotools.cygclass
+++ #
@@ -391,12 +391,21 @@
warning "libtool is incompatible with autoconf-2.13";
fi
;;
- 2.5|'')
- WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5
-
- case $(autoconf --version 2> /dev/null | head -n 1) in
+ 2.5|2.7|'')
+ case "${WANT_AUTOCONF}" in
+ 2.5|'')
+ WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5
+ case $(autoconf --version 2> /dev/null | head -n 1) in
autoconf*2.[56]?) ;;
*) error "autoconf2.5 is required to build this
package" ;;
+ esac
+ ;;
+ 2.7)
+ WANT_AUTOCONF=2.7
+ case $(autoconf --version 2> /dev/null | head -n 1) in
+ autoconf*2.[7]?) ;;
+ *) error "autoconf2.7 is required to build this
package" ;;
+ esac
esac
if __config_equals with_libtool 1
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds
[GOLDSTAR] Re: [ITP] autoconf2.7
On Dec 3 14:42, ASSI wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > Since Fedora did basically the same, as Ken pointed out, maybe we're > > a bit meticulous if we create a new package for 2.7x? > > Well, if we don't, we're SOL if we hit an incompatibility that the Linux > folks don't need to care about… that was why I originally suggested to > wait it out a bit. > > > I don't know how the experience is in the various environments, but > > nobody appears to care... > > If I look at the changes, many are for "fringe" platforms, so how far > out in the fringes is Cygwin? No idea. I cringe at the idea of calling Cygwin a fringe platform. Now, if you call Cygwin a Gringe platform OTOH :) Nah, in fact, given we already have the autoconf versioning in place, it probably doesn't hurt to do it right. Btw., goldstar request for Achim here! Corinna
Re: [ITP] autoconf2.7
Corinna Vinschen writes: > Since Fedora did basically the same, as Ken pointed out, maybe we're > a bit meticulous if we create a new package for 2.7x? Well, if we don't, we're SOL if we hit an incompatibility that the Linux folks don't need to care about… that was why I originally suggested to wait it out a bit. > I don't know how the experience is in the various environments, but > nobody appears to care... If I look at the changes, many are for "fringe" platforms, so how far out in the fringes is Cygwin? Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra
Re: [ITP] autoconf2.7
On Dec 3 11:22, ASSI wrote: > Ken Brown writes: > > You should probably also adopt and update the autoconf package, which > > provides the ac-wrapper script. The latest upstream version is at > > > > > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/plain/sys-devel/autoconf-wrapper/files/ac-wrapper-15.sh > > Hmm. That looks wrong, the Gentoo folks rolled both 2.70 and 2.71 into > the WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5 category (which likely works for them). So yay, > I'll have to patch that. Since Fedora did basically the same, as Ken pointed out, maybe we're a bit meticulous if we create a new package for 2.7x? I don't know how the experience is in the various environments, but nobody appears to care... Corinna
Re: [ITP] autoconf2.7
Ken Brown writes: > You should probably also adopt and update the autoconf package, which > provides the ac-wrapper script. The latest upstream version is at > > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/plain/sys-devel/autoconf-wrapper/files/ac-wrapper-15.sh Hmm. That looks wrong, the Gentoo folks rolled both 2.70 and 2.71 into the WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5 category (which likely works for them). So yay, I'll have to patch that. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ DIY Stuff: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/DIY.html
