RE: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
Hello! Did you send your ssh key per https://sourceware.org/cygwin-apps/package-upload.html already? Sorry, not yet. Quite short of time, forgot to do it this weekend. Will do it this week. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
Re: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
On Mar 24 17:14, Pavel Fedin wrote: Hello! So why not just provide a single onc-rpc-devel, that should be entirely sufficent. onc-rpc-headers is obsolete, ignore it. The idea of creating onc-rpc-devel came to me in order to merge headers and rpcgen. Did you send your ssh key per https://sourceware.org/cygwin-apps/package-upload.html already? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat pgpVBtQwMdus9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:02:37AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 24 17:14, Pavel Fedin wrote: Hello! So why not just provide a single onc-rpc-devel, that should be entirely sufficent. onc-rpc-headers is obsolete, ignore it. The idea of creating onc-rpc-devel came to me in order to merge headers and rpcgen. Did you send your ssh key per https://sourceware.org/cygwin-apps/package-upload.html already? It won't do any good until he's in cygwin-pkg-maint. This. Is a recording.
Re: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
On Mar 27 10:55, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:02:37AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 24 17:14, Pavel Fedin wrote: Hello! So why not just provide a single onc-rpc-devel, that should be entirely sufficent. onc-rpc-headers is obsolete, ignore it. The idea of creating onc-rpc-devel came to me in order to merge headers and rpcgen. Did you send your ssh key per https://sourceware.org/cygwin-apps/package-upload.html already? It won't do any good until he's in cygwin-pkg-maint. Done. Btw., it just occured to me that the version numeber of the package is using underscores instead of dots. That should be onc-rpc-devel-2.19.20140211-1 shouldn't it? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat pgpM2yu9CRBq3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
On Mar 21 15:48, Pavel Fedin wrote: Hello! Some time ago i intended to publish this package. Since that everything stopped, i have never got any go or fix it reply. The URL is the same as before: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s95jz1ql5xs8yx7/8mhUDlI_Kg Anyone ??? Yes, me. Packaging looks basically ok, but there's a problem. Both packages, onc-rpc-devel as well as onc-rpc-headers provide the same set of include files. That has to be fixed. Btw., what's the idea behind providing the header files in an extra package? If I download a devel package, I expect the headers to be in there. So why not just provide a single onc-rpc-devel, that should be entirely sufficent. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat pgpmlIfKhvVTA.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
Hello! So why not just provide a single onc-rpc-devel, that should be entirely sufficent. onc-rpc-headers is obsolete, ignore it. The idea of creating onc-rpc-devel came to me in order to merge headers and rpcgen. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
[ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
Hello! Some time ago i intended to publish this package. Since that everything stopped, i have never got any go or fix it reply. The URL is the same as before: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s95jz1ql5xs8yx7/8mhUDlI_Kg Anyone ??? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia setup.hint Description: Binary data
RE: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
Give me a day or two to validate your package, and create the new versions of the old packages, and then we'll coordinate a simultaneous upload. Ping ? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
[ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
Hello! This is me again, and this is my promised RPC package. Folder URL: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s95jz1ql5xs8yx7/8mhUDlI_Kg I have updated the whole thing using recent source code. Translations included. I hope you'll like the result. One small question: how to specify in setup.hint that this package replaces old rpcgen and sunrpc ? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia setup.hint Description: Binary data
Re: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
On 2/12/2014 7:45 AM, Pavel Fedin wrote: This is me again, and this is my promised RPC package. Folder URL: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s95jz1ql5xs8yx7/8mhUDlI_Kg I have updated the whole thing using recent source code. Translations included. I hope you'll like the result. One small question: how to specify in setup.hint that this package replaces old rpcgen and sunrpc ? Actually, you don't do that in your setup.hint. Instead, the maintainer(s) of the old rpcgen and sunrpc packages publish new (empty) versions of them, and in the new setup.hints for those, mark them as follows: requires: one-rpc-devel category: _obsolete Give me a day or two to validate your package, and create the new versions of the old packages, and then we'll coordinate a simultaneous upload. -- Chuck
RE: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
Hello! Give me a day or two to validate your package, and create the new versions of the old packages, and then we'll coordinate a simultaneous upload. No, i386 should wait for now. If we remove 'sunrpc', we remove portmapper, on which nfs-server depends. i386 can be changed only after both rpcbind and nfs-server update are completed. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
