Re: [adding docs to nasm] unfulfilled build deps for pdf

2002-12-29 Thread Charles Wilson
Is there some part of the package missing?  If so, it isn't clear
from your message.  What's AFPL?


Ghostscript is released (first) under a non-free but opensource license 
(Alladin Free Public License), and then six months to one year later 
under the GPL (when it is called GNU Ghostscript).

Currently, the AFPL version of ghostscript is at version 8.00, while GNU 
ghostscript is at 7.05.

We (cygwin) distribute GNU ghostscript.

So I *think* what the poster was saying, was that the nasm docs require 
a ghostscript newer than 7.05 --- e.g. 8.0, which is currently available 
only as an AFPL release.

--Chuck




[adding docs to nasm] unfulfilled build deps for pdf

2002-12-28 Thread Dean Scarff
As per your suggestion to add the extra docs to the nasm package, I have found that 
nasm requires AFPL ghostscript to build the pdf.  This package is not currently part 
of cygwin (although there is an old contrib that never made it here: 
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00185.html ).

So my question is, is there a policy regarding relying on non-(official)cygwin 
packages for builds?  I can easily just add the pdf built on linux to the binary 
package, but this would mean that the source package will be incapable (under cygwin) 
of producing the binary.

The other option as Joshua suggested is to provide a separate docs package (which 
doesnt need a corresponding source).

Cheers,
Dean Scarff
-- 
___
Get your free email from http://mymail.operamail.com

Powered by Outblaze



Re: [adding docs to nasm] unfulfilled build deps for pdf

2002-12-28 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 09:49:31AM +0800, Dean Scarff wrote:
As per your suggestion to add the extra docs to the nasm package, I
have found that nasm requires AFPL ghostscript to build the pdf.  This
package is not currently part of cygwin (although there is an old
contrib that never made it here:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00185.html ).

Huh?  You're quoting a message from the ghostscript package maintainer.
This package was dutifully uploaded to sources.redhat.com by our
ever vigilant Pavel Tsekov.

Is there some part of the package missing?  If so, it isn't clear
from your message.  What's AFPL?

cgf