Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Max Bowsher wrote: Brian Keener wrote: On a side note - Max - did you have to make any changes to get it to compile - for some reason - my compile is now broken and I am not sure if it is the gcc3 install or the mingw changes. Do you have any ideas? Cygwin Packages: binutils20020706-2 gcc 2.95.3-5 mingw-runtime 2.2-1 w32api 2.0-1 Configure line: from http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html MinGW libstdc++: gcc-2.95.3-20010828 Problems: none :-) Hi, all. My configuration is identical to the above except for the MinGW libstdc++ -- I was stupid enough to install the 3.2 version of gcc-mingw, and the older one doesn't seem to be available on the mirrors anymore... :-( I downloaded gcc-2.95.3-20010828.tar.gz mentioned above, but it seems to have a whole new set of mingw-special compilers in usr/bin, so I can't just extract it from /, or can I? Can anyone let me know what is the minimal set of things that I have to extract from the tar to get setup to link? Thanks, Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Water molecules expand as they grow warmer (C) Popular Science, Oct'02, p.51
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Max Bowsher wrote: Brian Keener wrote: On a side note - Max - did you have to make any changes to get it to compile - for some reason - my compile is now broken and I am not sure if it is the gcc3 install or the mingw changes. Do you have any ideas? Cygwin Packages: binutils20020706-2 gcc 2.95.3-5 mingw-runtime 2.2-1 w32api 2.0-1 Configure line: from http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html MinGW libstdc++: gcc-2.95.3-20010828 Problems: none :-) Hi, all. My configuration is identical to the above except for the MinGW libstdc++ -- I was stupid enough to install the 3.2 version of gcc-mingw, and the older one doesn't seem to be available on the mirrors anymore... :-( I downloaded gcc-2.95.3-20010828.tar.gz mentioned above, but it seems to have a whole new set of mingw-special compilers in usr/bin, so I can't just extract it from /, or can I? Can anyone let me know what is the minimal set of things that I have to extract from the tar to get setup to link? Thanks, Extract _only_ usr/lib/libstdc++.a from the mingw tarball to /usr/lib/mingw/libstdc++.a As an aside, I believe setup is not at all very compatible with gcc3 at the moment. Max.
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: With gcc-3.2, gcc2, and gcc-mingw-3.2-20020817 (IIRC) installed, the link still fails. I've replaced 'gcc' and 'g++' by 'gcc-2' and 'g++-2' respectively in the suggested configure options... I suppose the build would have worked with gcc2, as long as the right mingw libstdc++.a was installed. I'll try that next, if it works for 2.95. The right libstdc++.a is *supposed* to be installed when you install gcc2. If you've installed the mingw gcc package too, then maybe that's what is mucking things up. The right *mingw* libstdc++.a ? It wasn't in the last gcc-2.95.3-5 package. I thought gcc2 was just a repackaging of what was already there. Max. Actually, the new gcc2 seems to package gcc-2.95.3-10... Also, my current libc.a seems to be missing mempcpy, although it's present in the headers. That's currently mucking up some other build for me. I'll probably do an uninstall and reinstall of all gcc packages before raising a flag on this, though. Unless there's something else I should consider? Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Water molecules expand as they grow warmer (C) Popular Science, Oct'02, p.51
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:30:15PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: With gcc-3.2, gcc2, and gcc-mingw-3.2-20020817 (IIRC) installed, the link still fails. I've replaced 'gcc' and 'g++' by 'gcc-2' and 'g++-2' respectively in the suggested configure options... I suppose the build would have worked with gcc2, as long as the right mingw libstdc++.a was installed. I'll try that next, if it works for 2.95. The right libstdc++.a is *supposed* to be installed when you install gcc2. If you've installed the mingw gcc package too, then maybe that's what is mucking things up. The right *mingw* libstdc++.a ? It wasn't in the last gcc-2.95.3-5 package. I thought gcc2 was just a repackaging of what was already there. Nope. Read the email discussion in cygwin. I added libstdc++.a a while ago.
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
Brian Keener wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: MinGW libstdc++: gcc-2.95.3-20010828 That was it Thanks Max. Somehow (not sure how) my version of libstdc++ in usr/lib/mingw got updated to a May 16 2002 version (appears to be for a 3.? Version of mingw). When I used the one from an older version - compile started functioning again. I am not sure what I did to cause this to change but looking back I have an idea it has to do with the some playing I've been doing with the Dev-C++ software. I guess I'll find out for sure when and if it goes to look for the 3. Version and can't find it. Again thanks for the help. No problem. But what about the gcc-mingw package? I haven't downloaded it yet, since my bandwidth is limited, but it sounds like a likely culprit!. Max.
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
Max Bowsher wrote: But what about the gcc-mingw package? I wasn't clear in my previous email. The Dev-C++ package is a graphical IDE that works with either Cygwin or with Mingw and as part of the download is included the compiler (Mingw I believe) and I think their most recent install of the IDE is including the latest version of Mingw and the gcc compiler (3.n isn't it). So yes I think your right that is where the confusion occurred on my part and I think either it installed a newer libstdc++ or I copied it but either way it happened. Thanks for the assist. bk
[setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
In the snapshot, sort order is alphabetically by package name. In CVS HEAD, sort order is by installed/not installed, followed by alphabetically by package name. Is this intentional? I could not find a ChangeLog entry saying so. Max.
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
Max Bowsher wrote: In CVS HEAD, sort order is by installed/not installed, followed by alphabetically by package name. Is this intentional? I could not find a ChangeLog entry saying so. Don't know if it was intentional or not but I must say I like it. I actually would like to see that as user selectable - see them all alpha but also see them by installed and not installed. I had submitted a change that expanded on the idea of the full list and partial list view that included 2 additional views for Unchanged (all keeps) and Not Installed (all skips) but I don't know if Robert ever did anything with it. In lieu of those changes I like this but I also like the option of seeing the full list by name too. I wonder if we could make the list sortable by column. (Ie clicking on the column). On a side note - Max - did you have to make any changes to get it too compile - for some reason - my compile is now broken and I am not sure if it is the gcc3 install or the mingw changes. Do you have any ideas? Bk
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
Brian Keener wrote: On a side note - Max - did you have to make any changes to get it too compile - for some reason - my compile is now broken and I am not sure if it is the gcc3 install or the mingw changes. Do you have any ideas? Cygwin Packages: binutils20020706-2 gcc 2.95.3-5 mingw-runtime 2.2-1 w32api 2.0-1 Configure line: from http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html MinGW libstdc++: gcc-2.95.3-20010828 Problems: none :-) Max.
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 01:34, Max Bowsher wrote: In the snapshot, sort order is alphabetically by package name. In CVS HEAD, sort order is by installed/not installed, followed by alphabetically by package name. Is this intentional? I could not find a ChangeLog entry saying so. It's a work in progress. The snapshot is not ready for release due to a couple of problems I observed when testing. Rob signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
Robert Collins wrote: On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 01:34, Max Bowsher wrote: In the snapshot, sort order is alphabetically by package name. In CVS HEAD, sort order is by installed/not installed, followed by alphabetically by package name. Is this intentional? I could not find a ChangeLog entry saying so. It's a work in progress. The snapshot is not ready for release due to a couple of problems I observed when testing. I was just about to suggest a new snapshot :-) What are the bugs? (I'm using HEAD + personal work-in-progess as my main setup, with the release version on standby in case I run into any bugs) Thanks. Max.
Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sort order in 'full' view.
Max Bowsher wrote: MinGW libstdc++: gcc-2.95.3-20010828 That was it Thanks Max. Somehow (not sure how) my version of libstdc++ in usr/lib/mingw got updated to a May 16 2002 version (appears to be for a 3.? Version of mingw). When I used the one from an older version - compile started functioning again. I am not sure what I did to cause this to change but looking back I have an idea it has to do with the some playing I've been doing with the Dev-C++ software. I guess I'll find out for sure when and if it goes to look for the 3. Version and can't find it. Again thanks for the help. Bk
