Re: ACL
Am 21.02.2023 um 14:10 schrieb Jonathan Chapman-Moore via Cygwin-apps: Hi, I was wondering when ACL was going to be added to Cygwin? It's long been available, see /bin/[gs]etfacl
ACL
Hi, I was wondering when ACL was going to be added to Cygwin? http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/acl Thanks, Jonathan Moore
[PATCH cygport] Remove all extended ACL entries of ${workdir}, first.
Hi!
This is another patch for cygport:
In lib/src_prep.cygpart/__mkdirs(),
remove all extended ACL entries of ${workdir}, first,
as a fool-proof (e.g., in case file permission tests are required,
or in case file permission under ${D} would be contaminated).
I encounterd a case (cmake) in which a file-permission test failed, but
it passed by using `setfacl -b`.
I think this patch would not harm.
Regards,
Lem
cygport-setfacl--remove-all.patch
Description: Binary data
Re: network installation access rights/ACL issues
On Jul 9 07:39, Thomas Wolff wrote: > Hi Corinna, > any ideas about this network installation problem? I sent the requested ACL > infos: > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2016-06/msg00084.html I looked at the ACLs but I don't see anything weird, sorry. Somebody would have to debug this in the problematic environment. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat signature.asc Description: PGP signature
network installation access rights/ACL issues
Hi Corinna, any ideas about this network installation problem? I sent the requested ACL infos: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2016-06/msg00084.html I'll be in that lab again on Monday, in case you may ask for further diagnostics. Thomas
Re: rsync 2.6.6.1 changed ACL behaviour?
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 07:37:35PM +0200, Mattias wrote: >Using rsync to update my web site on a Windows 2003 Server using the >following command > >rsync --archive --stats /cygdrive/c/data/publish/ -e ssh >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cygdrive/c/Inetpub/ssc2 > >Worked fine for a year. > >Stopped working recently. rsync doesn't set the ACL correctly. rsync >sets the rights of the Users user to nothing at all, >which makes the web site not work at all. (I have switched my laptop >since it last worked and reinstalled cygwin.) > >After running rsync, I have to go to the server, opening the security >dialog for the directory, pressing advanced, selecting > >"Replace permission entries on all child objects with enties shown >here that apply child objects" > >These are the default permissions, so why doesn't rsync use them. >Which permissions do rsync use? > >P.s. Is there a simple way in cygwin setup.exe to just revert to an >older version of a single package, in my case rsync 2.6.3? Please go back and read http://cygwin.com/lists.html again. This is not a bug reporting mailing list or a list for asking about usage questions. Please use the main cygwin mailing list for that.
rsync 2.6.6.1 changed ACL behaviour?
Using rsync to update my web site on a Windows 2003 Server using the following command rsync --archive --stats /cygdrive/c/data/publish/ -e ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cygdrive/c/Inetpub/ssc2 Worked fine for a year. Stopped working recently. rsync doesn't set the ACL correctly. rsync sets the rights of the Users user to nothing at all, which makes the web site not work at all. (I have switched my laptop since it last worked and reinstalled cygwin.) After running rsync, I have to go to the server, opening the security dialog for the directory, pressing advanced, selecting "Replace permission entries on all child objects with enties shown here that apply child objects" These are the default permissions, so why doesn't rsync use them. Which permissions do rsync use? -- Mattias P.s. Is there a simple way in cygwin setup.exe to just revert to an older version of a single package, in my case rsync 2.6.3?
