Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:34:26AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: >In practice there is one niggle, the src package generates >aspell-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 already - but it's the amalgam of all of the other >binary packages. It produces aspell-bin. Fixing this will probably only >take me a couple of minutes (when I get the time say in a couple of days) - >but I don't think that it should be a show stopper for uploading the rest >now. >Renaming the file and changing the hint files are trivial - I'm assuming you >don't need me to upload them again? If you do want me to do them then I'll >do it whenever I see the reply which will be ... after I sleep probably. I've downloaded everything already. I'll move the directory now. (Hmm. Automatice md5 checksumming of directories in ~ftp seems to be broken. Wonderful.) cgf
RE: Aspell ... (ready?)
> >AFAIC, we're ready.
> >I'll repeat the URLs for the dictionaries:
> >
> >04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
> >http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
> >33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
> >http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
> >
> >Gareth pointed to the following URLs in
> >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00176.html:
> >
> >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2
> >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
> >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin.setup.hint
> >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
> >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev.setup.hint
> >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
> >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc.setup.hint
> >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
> >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15.setup.hint
> >
> >Gareth says in http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00179.html
> >that there's no need to mark them as test, despite the fact that the gcc
> >he used is still marked as such. Personally, I'd mark at least aspell-dev
> >as test, seeing as that contains the files that won't work with the
> current
> >gcc, but it's his call (he's the maintainer, after all :)
>
> I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people
> do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of
> naming the binary 'aspell-bin'. I'd like to change that. Otherwise
> we have a base package which only contains source, which is also
> unusual. I'd prefer to "mv aspell-{bin-,}0.50.3-1.tar.bz2" and
> put it at the top level of the aspell directory and move everything else
> underneath it.
>
> Gareth, do you have a problem with that?
I have no problem with either of the above 2 points in theory... both the
rename and the marking of aspell-dev as test. (and adding dependency on
aspell-en - from other email)
In practice there is one niggle, the src package generates
aspell-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 already - but it's the amalgam of all of the other
binary packages. It produces aspell-bin. Fixing this will probably only
take me a couple of minutes (when I get the time say in a couple of days) -
but I don't think that it should be a show stopper for uploading the rest
now.
Renaming the file and changing the hint files are trivial - I'm assuming you
don't need me to upload them again? If you do want me to do them then I'll
do it whenever I see the reply which will be ... after I sleep probably.
Regards,
Gareth
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:30:32AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people
> > >do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of
> > >naming the binary 'aspell-bin'. I'd like to change that. Otherwise
> > >we have a base package which only contains source, which is also
> > >unusual. I'd prefer to "mv aspell-{bin-,}0.50.3-1.tar.bz2" and
> > >put it at the top level of the aspell directory and move everything else
> > >underneath it.
> > >
> > >Gareth, do you have a problem with that?
> >
> > And another point -- I'd like to make aspell depend on aspell-en.
> > Otherwise, I suspect that the cygwin mailing list will be constantly
> > complaining about aspell not working.
> >
> > cgf
>
> There's no setup.hint for the aspell-en package (which, I assume, will
> depend on aspell).
OK, OK, it's a long while ago, but there actually was one in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00161.html:
@ aspell-en
sdesc: "Aspell english dictionary"
requires: cygwin aspell
category: Utils
> BTW, beware of circular dependences -- if both aspell
> and aspell-en have postinstall scripts, and the one in aspell-en uses
> aspell, it might be run before aspell's postinstall script runs, so aspell
> may be in an inconsistent state. I don't think this is a problem, but the
> maintainers should both be aware of this and coordinate the postinstall
> scripts.
Aspell-en doesn't have a post-install script.
rlc
--
DeVries' Dilemma:
If you hit two keys on the typewriter, the one you don't want
hits the paper.
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people
> >do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of
> >naming the binary 'aspell-bin'. I'd like to change that. Otherwise
> >we have a base package which only contains source, which is also
> >unusual. I'd prefer to "mv aspell-{bin-,}0.50.3-1.tar.bz2" and
> >put it at the top level of the aspell directory and move everything else
> >underneath it.
> >
> >Gareth, do you have a problem with that?
>
> And another point -- I'd like to make aspell depend on aspell-en.
> Otherwise, I suspect that the cygwin mailing list will be constantly
> complaining about aspell not working.
>
> cgf
There's no setup.hint for the aspell-en package (which, I assume, will
depend on aspell). BTW, beware of circular dependences -- if both aspell
and aspell-en have postinstall scripts, and the one in aspell-en uses
aspell, it might be run before aspell's postinstall script runs, so aspell
may be in an inconsistent state. I don't think this is a problem, but the
maintainers should both be aware of this and coordinate the postinstall
scripts.
BTW, I don't have time to look now, but if setup's topological sort
traverses loops alphabetically, the above may be a red herring anyway
(i.e., aspell will always execute before aspell-en in that case).
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people
>do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of
>naming the binary 'aspell-bin'. I'd like to change that. Otherwise
>we have a base package which only contains source, which is also
>unusual. I'd prefer to "mv aspell-{bin-,}0.50.3-1.tar.bz2" and
>put it at the top level of the aspell directory and move everything else
>underneath it.
>
>Gareth, do you have a problem with that?
And another point -- I'd like to make aspell depend on aspell-en.
Otherwise, I suspect that the cygwin mailing list will be constantly
complaining about aspell not working.
cgf
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:40:28PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:46:47AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>
>> >inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us doing the
>> >coordinated release of the aspell and dictionary this weekend? I was fairly
>> >sure that the last available version (which was compiled by rlc not me, but
>> >otherwise was perfectly normal) didnt recieve any aditional feedback.
>> >
>> >Gareth - the not-quite-just-yet owner of the new-but-not-spiffy aspell
>> >maintainership hat.
>>
>> What was the answer to this question? I've wanted [ai]spell in the
>> distribution for a long time and I'm anxious to get something in.
>> Are we ready? If so, point me at a URL and I'll download it.
>AFAIC, we're ready.
>I'll repeat the URLs for the dictionaries:
>
>04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
>http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
>33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
>http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
>
>Gareth pointed to the following URLs in
>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00176.html:
>
>http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2
>http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
>http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin.setup.hint
>http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
>http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev.setup.hint
>http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
>http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc.setup.hint
>http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
>http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15.setup.hint
>
>Gareth says in http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00179.html
>that there's no need to mark them as test, despite the fact that the gcc
>he used is still marked as such. Personally, I'd mark at least aspell-dev
>as test, seeing as that contains the files that won't work with the current
>gcc, but it's his call (he's the maintainer, after all :)
I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people
do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of
naming the binary 'aspell-bin'. I'd like to change that. Otherwise
we have a base package which only contains source, which is also
unusual. I'd prefer to "mv aspell-{bin-,}0.50.3-1.tar.bz2" and
put it at the top level of the aspell directory and move everything else
underneath it.
Gareth, do you have a problem with that?
cgf
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:46:47AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: > >inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us doing the > >coordinated release of the aspell and dictionary this weekend? I was fairly > >sure that the last available version (which was compiled by rlc not me, but > >otherwise was perfectly normal) didnt recieve any aditional feedback. > > > >Gareth - the not-quite-just-yet owner of the new-but-not-spiffy aspell > >maintainership hat. > > What was the answer to this question? I've wanted [ai]spell in the > distribution for a long time and I'm anxious to get something in. > Are we ready? If so, point me at a URL and I'll download it. AFAIC, we're ready. I'll repeat the URLs for the dictionaries: 04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 Gareth pointed to the following URLs in http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00176.html: http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin.setup.hint http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev.setup.hint http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc.setup.hint http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15.setup.hint Gareth says in http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00179.html that there's no need to mark them as test, despite the fact that the gcc he used is still marked as such. Personally, I'd mark at least aspell-dev as test, seeing as that contains the files that won't work with the current gcc, but it's his call (he's the maintainer, after all :) rlc -- "No one gets too old to learn a new way of being stupid."
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: > >> -- >> >>++ >>| BB | <-- my spiffy new Cygwin Bash Maintainer Hat ;) >>| AA | >>| SS | >>| HH | >> +-Cygwin-+ >> | o o | >> | || | >> \ \__/ / >>\/ >> > >inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us doing the >coordinated release of the aspell and dictionary this weekend? I was fairly >sure that the last available version (which was compiled by rlc not me, but >otherwise was perfectly normal) didnt recieve any aditional feedback. > >Gareth - the not-quite-just-yet owner of the new-but-not-spiffy aspell >maintainership hat. What was the answer to this question? I've wanted [ai]spell in the distribution for a long time and I'm anxious to get something in. Are we ready? If so, point me at a URL and I'll download it. cgf
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
Doh - i forgot gcc 3.3.1 is 'test' - but indeed - if theres Anyone who wants to develop with libaspell before gcc test version goes real - i think they can use the test ... no? I dont really think that aspell needs to be marked as test because of this. Gareth > You haven't marked them as "test" while gcc-3.3.1 isn't canonical yet. It > won't harm (much) I think, but it might if someone wants to go ahead and > develop something with libaspell.. > > rlc
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
FWIW, the dictionary files are now here: 04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 I did not regenerate them (mostly because I haven't installed Gareth's latest aspell yet). If regeneration is necessary, I'll do it shortly :) rlc On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:53:38PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > You haven't marked them as "test" while gcc-3.3.1 isn't canonical yet. It > won't harm (much) I think, but it might if someone wants to go ahead and > develop something with libaspell.. > > rlc > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:53:52PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: > > > > inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us doing the > > > > coordinated release of the aspell and dictionary this weekend? I was > > fairly > > > > sure that the last available version (which was compiled by rlc not me, > > but > > > > otherwise was perfectly normal) didnt recieve any aditional feedback. > > > > > > > > Gareth - the not-quite-just-yet owner of the new-but-not-spiffy aspell > > > > maintainership hat. > > > Your hat isn't spiffy? > > > Anyways, AFAIC, Aspell is ready to roll.. > > > I just don't remember whether what I put on my site is still there.. > > > hmm.. > > > [checking] > > > hmm.. no longer there.. > > > Do you still have them, Gareth, or should I make them available again? > > > > okay - recompiled with gcc 3.3.1 (libaspell is c++ library) - and appearing > > all nice and functional. (for me at least) > > > > ready for upload? > > > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2 > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin.setup.hint > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev.setup.hint > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc.setup.hint > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15.setup.hint > > > > Regards, > > Gareth > > -- > Well, the handwriting is on the floor. > -- Joe E. Lewis -- Q: What do little WASPs want to be when they grow up? A: The very best person they can possibly be.
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
You haven't marked them as "test" while gcc-3.3.1 isn't canonical yet. It won't harm (much) I think, but it might if someone wants to go ahead and develop something with libaspell.. rlc On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:53:52PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: > > > inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us doing the > > > coordinated release of the aspell and dictionary this weekend? I was > fairly > > > sure that the last available version (which was compiled by rlc not me, > but > > > otherwise was perfectly normal) didnt recieve any aditional feedback. > > > > > > Gareth - the not-quite-just-yet owner of the new-but-not-spiffy aspell > > > maintainership hat. > > Your hat isn't spiffy? > > Anyways, AFAIC, Aspell is ready to roll.. > > I just don't remember whether what I put on my site is still there.. > > hmm.. > > [checking] > > hmm.. no longer there.. > > Do you still have them, Gareth, or should I make them available again? > > okay - recompiled with gcc 3.3.1 (libaspell is c++ library) - and appearing > all nice and functional. (for me at least) > > ready for upload? > > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin.setup.hint > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev.setup.hint > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc.setup.hint > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15.setup.hint > > Regards, > Gareth -- Well, the handwriting is on the floor. -- Joe E. Lewis
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
> > inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us doing the > > coordinated release of the aspell and dictionary this weekend? I was fairly > > sure that the last available version (which was compiled by rlc not me, but > > otherwise was perfectly normal) didnt recieve any aditional feedback. > > > > Gareth - the not-quite-just-yet owner of the new-but-not-spiffy aspell > > maintainership hat. > Your hat isn't spiffy? > Anyways, AFAIC, Aspell is ready to roll.. > I just don't remember whether what I put on my site is still there.. > hmm.. > [checking] > hmm.. no longer there.. > Do you still have them, Gareth, or should I make them available again? okay - recompiled with gcc 3.3.1 (libaspell is c++ library) - and appearing all nice and functional. (for me at least) ready for upload? http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin.setup.hint http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev.setup.hint http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc.setup.hint http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15.setup.hint Regards, Gareth
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: > > > -- > > > >++ > >| BB | <-- my spiffy new Cygwin Bash Maintainer Hat ;) > >| AA | > >| SS | > >| HH | > > +-Cygwin-+ > > | o o | > > | || | > > \ \__/ / > >\/ > > > > inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us doing the > coordinated release of the aspell and dictionary this weekend? I was fairly > sure that the last available version (which was compiled by rlc not me, but > otherwise was perfectly normal) didnt recieve any aditional feedback. > > Gareth - the not-quite-just-yet owner of the new-but-not-spiffy aspell > maintainership hat. Your hat isn't spiffy? Anyways, AFAIC, Aspell is ready to roll.. I just don't remember whether what I put on my site is still there.. hmm.. [checking] hmm.. no longer there.. Do you still have them, Gareth, or should I make them available again? rlc --
