RE: ITP: graphviz (and doxygen?)

2003-09-26 Thread Gareth Pearce
  If Debian has put it under non-free it does not meet Debian's poliy for
 main.
  It's problamy not compatible with GPL or the OpenSource Definition
  
   For reference:
   http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/license/index.html
   http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/download.html
 
  I could not find the license under OSD Approved Licenses. And it's way
 too
  longer to get an idea about it without spending several hours with a
 lawyer 8-(
  http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.php
 
 Gareth,
 
 If all you need in GraphViz is DOT, you may consider distributing VCG
 (http://rw4.cs.uni-sb.de/users/sander/html/gsvcg1.html) instead.  It's
 graph description language is very similar to DOT's, and it's GPL'd.

Hrmm looks interesting, I've had no luck finding an interface to doxygen yet
though, which is the only thing 'I' use dot for.

I think I'll at least package up a new doxygen for now.  Graphviz is still
short on votes ;) - reguardless of its legal status.



Re: ITP: graphviz (and doxygen?)

2003-09-25 Thread Hack Kampbjorn
Gareth Pearce wrote:
One thing to note is that in debian it is distributed under non-free.  So
perhaps someone might like to comment on if the license is valid for
setup.exe distribution.
If Debian has put it under non-free it does not meet Debian's poliy for main. 
It's problamy not compatible with GPL or the OpenSource Definition
For reference:
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/license/index.html
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/download.html
I could not find the license under OSD Approved Licenses. And it's way too 
longer to get an idea about it without spending several hours with a lawyer 8-(
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.php

--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards
Hack Kampbjørn



Re: ITP: graphviz (and doxygen?)

2003-09-25 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Hack Kampbjorn wrote:

 Gareth Pearce wrote:
  One thing to note is that in debian it is distributed under non-free.  So
  perhaps someone might like to comment on if the license is valid for
  setup.exe distribution.

 If Debian has put it under non-free it does not meet Debian's poliy for main.
 It's problamy not compatible with GPL or the OpenSource Definition
 
  For reference:
  http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/license/index.html
  http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/download.html

 I could not find the license under OSD Approved Licenses. And it's way too
 longer to get an idea about it without spending several hours with a lawyer 8-(
 http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.php

Gareth,

If all you need in GraphViz is DOT, you may consider distributing VCG
(http://rw4.cs.uni-sb.de/users/sander/html/gsvcg1.html) instead.  It's
graph description language is very similar to DOT's, and it's GPL'd.
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster.  -- Patrick Naughton