Re: Proposal: stunnel (uploaded)
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Marcel Telka wrote: [...] Updated packages are available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-3-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-3.tar.bz2 Marcel, I have uploaded stunnel. Please send an announcement in a couple of hours. Thanks, Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB http://www.emcb.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Proposal: stunnel
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:19:14PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Marcel Telka wrote: Hi. I've created stunnel packages for cygwin: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 setup.hint: sdesc: Universal SSL Wrapper category: Admin requires: cygwin openssl initscripts setup.ini is available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini Testing, comments and votes are welcome. A few comments: The overwhelming majority of Cygwin packages use /usr/doc, not /usr/share/doc. (The only exceptions being dpkg, groff, libxml2, libxslt - should they change to fit the pattern?) I don't think requires: initscripts is right - presumably, you could run stunnel from cygrunsrv? I don't think category: Admin is right. Net seems more appropriate to me personally. Thank you for your comments. I've updated proposed stunnel packages: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2.tar.bz2 setup.hint: sdesc: Universal SSL Wrapper category: Net requires: cygwin openssl setup.ini is available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini Changes since 4.04-1: Moved documentation files from /usr/share/doc/stunnel to /usr/doc/stunnel-4.04 Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Proposal: stunnel
Marcel Telka wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:19:14PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Marcel Telka wrote:
I've created stunnel packages for cygwin:
...
A few comments:
...
Thank you for your comments.
I've updated proposed stunnel packages:
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2-src.tar.bz2
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2.tar.bz2
Thanks.
Sorry I didn't spot this before, but:
if [ ! -d ${instdir}${prefix}/var/run/stunnel ]; then \
mkdir -p ${instdir}${prefix}/var/run/stunnel ; \
fi \
is incorrect. (Remove ${prefix}).
Also, there are some bugs in stunnel.conf-sample.in and stunnel.init.in -
they are using @prefix@/foo where they should be using @localstatedir@ or
@[EMAIL PROTECTED] This causes the paths to be incorrect. (You may wish to submit
these changes upstream.)
Once these are fixed, I believe the packaging is fully correct, though I or
someone else still needs to do a functionality review. I will probably get
to this in a day or two, unless someone beats me to it.
Max.
Re: Proposal: stunnel
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Marcel Telka wrote:
I've updated proposed stunnel packages:
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2-src.tar.bz2
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2.tar.bz2
Thanks.
Sorry I didn't spot this before, but:
if [ ! -d ${instdir}${prefix}/var/run/stunnel ]; then \
mkdir -p ${instdir}${prefix}/var/run/stunnel ; \
fi \
is incorrect. (Remove ${prefix}).
Also, there are some bugs in stunnel.conf-sample.in and stunnel.init.in -
they are using @prefix@/foo where they should be using @localstatedir@ or
@[EMAIL PROTECTED] This causes the paths to be incorrect. (You may wish to submit
these changes upstream.)
Thanks.
Updated packages are available at:
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-3-src.tar.bz2
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-3.tar.bz2
--
+---+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
|jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+---+
Re: Proposal: stunnel
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Marcel Telka wrote: Hi. I've created stunnel packages for cygwin: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 setup.hint: sdesc: Universal SSL Wrapper category: Admin requires: cygwin openssl initscripts setup.ini is available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini Testing, comments and votes are welcome. This definately gets my vote. :-) Elfyn --
Re: Proposal: stunnel
Marcel schrieb: Hi. I've created stunnel packages for cygwin: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 setup.hint: sdesc: Universal SSL Wrapper category: Admin requires: cygwin openssl initscripts setup.ini is available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini Testing, comments and votes are welcome. I vote pro. Though I had some problems to build it since the 'source' package includes precompiled windows binaries and more windowish thingies. Have you wrote s.th. about the build-process? Can you post the README if so, please? Gerrit -- =^..^=
Re: Proposal: stunnel
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:45:54AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Marcel schrieb: Hi. I've created stunnel packages for cygwin: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 setup.hint: sdesc: Universal SSL Wrapper category: Admin requires: cygwin openssl initscripts setup.ini is available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini Testing, comments and votes are welcome. I vote pro. Thanks. Though I had some problems to build it since the 'source' package includes precompiled windows binaries and more windowish thingies. Have you wrote s.th. about the build-process? Can you post the README if so, please? README is included in stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2, here is an excerpt: Build requirements: cygwin-1.3.10 or newer openssl-devel Build instructions: unpack stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 if you use setup to install this src package, it will be unpacked under /usr/src automatically cd /usr/src ./stunnel-4.04-1.sh all This will create: /usr/src/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 /usr/src/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 Hope this helps. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Proposal: stunnel
Hi Gerrit. On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:20:36PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hi Marcel, Build instructions: unpack stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 if you use setup to install this src package, it will be unpacked under /usr/src automatically cd /usr/src ./stunnel-4.04-1.sh all This will create: /usr/src/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 /usr/src/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 Hope this helps. As I wrote, I found a native windows executable in the dist which make Ah. Yes. building a new one in the source directory impossible without deleting the old one, maybe that this is not a problem when building out of the source directory, though. Cygwin packages are built by default outside the source tree. So, there is no problem. I've created a patch to successful build outside the tree. If you want to build stunnel in the source tree, then there are some additional tweaks required. stunnel.exe deletion is an example. I've never tested this type of the build... Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Proposal: stunnel
Marcel Telka wrote: Hi. I've created stunnel packages for cygwin: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 setup.hint: sdesc: Universal SSL Wrapper category: Admin requires: cygwin openssl initscripts setup.ini is available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini Testing, comments and votes are welcome. A few comments: The overwhelming majority of Cygwin packages use /usr/doc, not /usr/share/doc. (The only exceptions being dpkg, groff, libxml2, libxslt - should they change to fit the pattern?) I don't think requires: initscripts is right - presumably, you could run stunnel from cygrunsrv? I don't think category: Admin is right. Net seems more appropriate to me personally. Max.
RE: Proposal: stunnel
My vote too! -Original Message- http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 setup.hint: sdesc: Universal SSL Wrapper category: Admin requires: cygwin openssl initscripts setup.ini is available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini Testing, comments and votes are welcome. This definately gets my vote. :-)
