RE: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Abe Backus wrote: Could this get uploaded soon? :) Thank you! -Abe Sorry I didn't get the original...bad, bad mail server. I will start uploading now. Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB | http://www.nongnu.org/wwwauth/ http://www.emcb.co.uk | http://www.emcb.co.uk/webauth/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | wwwauth-users AT nongnu DOT org
RE: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Abe Backus wrote: Could this get uploaded soon? :) Thank you! -Abe Sorry I didn't get the original...bad, bad mail server. I will start uploading now. Uploaded. Thanks, Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB | http://www.nongnu.org/wwwauth/ http://www.emcb.co.uk | http://www.emcb.co.uk/webauth/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | wwwauth-users AT nongnu DOT org
RE: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
Could this get uploaded soon? :) Thank you! -Abe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Abe Backus Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3 This is a version labeled test, built with the cygwin test version 1.5.0. http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/libxerces-c23/setup.hint http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/libxerces-c23/libxerces-c23-2. 3.0-3.tar.bz2 http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/setup.hint http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-2.3.0-3.tar.bz2 http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-2.3.0-3-src.tar.bz2 http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-devel/setup.hint http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-devel/xerces-c-devel- 2.3.0-3.tar.bz2 http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-doc/setup.hint http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-doc/xerces-c-doc-2.3. 0-3.tar.bz2 The setup.hint files all have a curr value of 2.3.0-2 and test of 2.3.0-3. Thanks! -Abe
Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: All in a day's work... ;-) As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you shouldn't have to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is). Unless another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure changes as they could in this one release. Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Nope, you're not wrong. Would you care to give yourself a long overdue gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service you've given in the past? cgf Don't mind if I do. That'd be a second one for those same reasons, though... Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster. -- Patrick Naughton
Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:48:49AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: All in a day's work... ;-) As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you shouldn't have to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is). Unless another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure changes as they could in this one release. Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Nope, you're not wrong. Would you care to give yourself a long overdue gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service you've given in the past? Don't mind if I do. That'd be a second one for those same reasons, though... Doh. Oh yeah, right. Well, still deserved anyway. cgf
RE: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 04:59:53AM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: All in a day's work... ;-) As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you shouldn't have to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is). Unless another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure changes as they could in this one release. Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Nope, you're not wrong. Would you care to give yourself a long overdue gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service you've given in the past? Shouldn't you get one, too? :-) I got a lot of gold stars in my PayPal account back in the time when I lost money to the stupid scammer. There's nothing more flattering or humbling than that. Besides I'd lose a gold star every time I was: BTW, what is 'idd'? Check out: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/ . Oh my, how flattering. And there was me thinking that thread went unnoticed... -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB http://www.emcb.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sweet, my own acronym! Less typing next time! -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot.
Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
Can I get a gold star for Abe? He's the first person to post his modified package here. Abe, take a bow. cgf On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:26:08PM -0700, Abe Backus wrote: This is a version labeled test, built with the cygwin test version 1.5.0. http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/libxerces-c23/setup.hint http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/libxerces-c23/libxerces-c23-2. 3.0-3.tar.bz2 http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/setup.hint http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-2.3.0-3.tar.bz2 http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-2.3.0-3-src.tar.bz2 http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-devel/setup.hint http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-devel/xerces-c-devel- 2.3.0-3.tar.bz2 http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-doc/setup.hint http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/xerces-c/xerces-c-doc/xerces-c-doc-2.3. 0-3.tar.bz2 The setup.hint files all have a curr value of 2.3.0-2 and test of 2.3.0-3. Thanks! -Abe
Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
You got it. Igor On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: Can I get a gold star for Abe? He's the first person to post his modified package here. Abe, take a bow. cgf On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:26:08PM -0700, Abe Backus wrote: This is a version labeled test, built with the cygwin test version 1.5.0. [snip] -Abe -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster. -- Patrick Naughton
RE: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
Well, thank you very much guys. That's quite an honor :) Should I rebuild against any upcoming revisions? (this is regarding Chris' recent email to the cygwin list regarding the 1.5.x release cycles) Thanks again! -Abe -Original Message- You got it. Igor On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: Can I get a gold star for Abe? He's the first person to post his modified package here. Abe, take a bow. cgf
Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: All in a day's work... ;-) As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you shouldn't have to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is). Unless another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure changes as they could in this one release. Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Nope, you're not wrong. Would you care to give yourself a long overdue gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service you've given in the past? cgf
Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: All in a day's work... ;-) As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you shouldn't have to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is). Unless another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure changes as they could in this one release. Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Nope, you're not wrong. Would you care to give yourself a long overdue gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service you've given in the past? cgf Shouldn't you get one, too? :-) BTW, what is 'idd'? Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB http://www.emcb.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 04:59:53AM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: All in a day's work... ;-) As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you shouldn't have to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is). Unless another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure changes as they could in this one release. Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Nope, you're not wrong. Would you care to give yourself a long overdue gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service you've given in the past? Shouldn't you get one, too? :-) I got a lot of gold stars in my PayPal account back in the time when I lost money to the stupid scammer. There's nothing more flattering or humbling than that. Besides I'd lose a gold star every time I was: BTW, what is 'idd'? Check out: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/ . cgf
Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 04:59:53AM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: All in a day's work... ;-) As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you shouldn't have to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is). Unless another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure changes as they could in this one release. Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Nope, you're not wrong. Would you care to give yourself a long overdue gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service you've given in the past? Shouldn't you get one, too? :-) I got a lot of gold stars in my PayPal account back in the time when I lost money to the stupid scammer. There's nothing more flattering or humbling than that. Besides I'd lose a gold star every time I was: BTW, what is 'idd'? Check out: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/ . Oh my, how flattering. And there was me thinking that thread went unnoticed... -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB http://www.emcb.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
