Re: [ITP] python-sphinx 1.2.3
[sorry Yaakov about the inadvertent off-list reply, I do need a better mail client] Based on the cmake ITA thread, does this need python-jinja2 and/or python-docutils? Tony mentioned that building documentation and manual/help require it. I assume we will need them also if Bill is making the package. My question was if normal usage of sphinx requires one or both of the other modules, or if they were unrelated. I'm not positive, but I can look into it. Does cygport auto-detect python package dependencies from distutils?
Re: [ITP] python-sphinx 1.2.3
On 06/10/14 07:20 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 06/10/2014 14:04, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 01/10/14 07:46 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 28/09/2014 04:11, Tony Kelman wrote: Packaging source taken directly from ports, bumped to latest upstream version of sphinx: https://github.com/tkelman/cygwin-python-sphinx setup.hint contents: category: Python requires: python python-imaging python-pygments python-setuptools Based on the cmake ITA thread, does this need python-jinja2 and/or python-docutils? Tony mentioned that building documentation and manual/help require it. I assume we will need them also if Bill is making the package. My question was if normal usage of sphinx requires one or both of the other modules, or if they were unrelated. Yaakov
Re: [ITP] python-sphinx 1.2.3
On 06/10/2014 14:04, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 01/10/14 07:46 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 28/09/2014 04:11, Tony Kelman wrote: Packaging source taken directly from ports, bumped to latest upstream version of sphinx: https://github.com/tkelman/cygwin-python-sphinx setup.hint contents: category: Python requires: python python-imaging python-pygments python-setuptools Based on the cmake ITA thread, does this need python-jinja2 and/or python-docutils? Yaakov Tony mentioned that building documentation and manual/help require it. I assume we will need them also if Bill is making the package. Regards Marco
Re: [ITP] python-sphinx 1.2.3
On 01/10/14 07:46 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 28/09/2014 04:11, Tony Kelman wrote: Packaging source taken directly from ports, bumped to latest upstream version of sphinx: https://github.com/tkelman/cygwin-python-sphinx setup.hint contents: category: Python requires: python python-imaging python-pygments python-setuptools Based on the cmake ITA thread, does this need python-jinja2 and/or python-docutils? Yaakov
Re: [ITP] python-sphinx 1.2.3
On 28/09/2014 04:11, Tony Kelman wrote:
Packaging source taken directly from ports, bumped to latest upstream
version of sphinx: https://github.com/tkelman/cygwin-python-sphinx
setup.hint contents:
category: Python
requires: python python-imaging python-pygments python-setuptools
sdesc: "Python documentation generator"
ldesc: "Sphinx is a tool that makes it easy to create intelligent and
beautiful documentation. It was originally created to translate the new
Python
documentation, and it has excellent support for the documentation of Python
projects, but other documents can be written with it too."
Fedora package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-sphinx
Package files:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8244638/cygwin-python-sphinx/i686/python-sphinx-1.2.3-1.tar.xz
[cut]
better
BASEURL=https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8244638/cygwin-python-sphinx
wget --no-check-certificate --no-host-directories --force-directories
--cut-dirs=2 \
${BASEURL}/i686/python-sphinx-1.2.3-1.tar.xz \
${BASEURL}/i686/python-sphinx-1.2.3-1-src.tar.xz \
${BASEURL}/i686/setup.hint \
${BASEURL}/x86_64/python-sphinx-1.2.3-1.tar.xz \
${BASEURL}/x86_64/python-sphinx-1.2.3-1-src.tar.xz \
${BASEURL}/x86_64/setup.hint
Fedora has one patch for 1.2.1, but openSUSE doesn't patch anything AFAICT.
-Tony
builds fine, package looks fine
GTG for me
Regards
Marco
