RE: comments on texmf package?
The trivial test case works for me. With tetex-beta-20001218-3 and texmf-2804-2 I can cp /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/small2e.tex . latex small2e.tex dvips small2e.dvi -o small2e.ps pdflatex small2e.tex The generated files looked OK. -Original Message- From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 3:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: comments on texmf package? Hi, Probably I'm too impatient, but I've been waiting so long for a full tex setup in Cygwin... Who will be looking at the new texmf packages? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-01/msg00311.html Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
Re: comments on texmf package?
Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not at all familar with tex so I'd like to ask somebody else > to look into these packages. The setup.hint files are looking ok to > me. Did you pack using the correct paths as given on > http://cygwin.com/setup.html#package_contents ? Yes, I believe so. > Another point: Aren't we still waiting for tetex-beta-20001218-3 > leaving `test' state or did I miss something? Yes it seems that way. In this case that's maybe a bit odd, because tetex-beta-20001218-1 has a number of problems. > IMO it doesn't make much sense to have these texmf packages in > `curr' state if they depend on a `test' package. Ok, so maybe adding some test: tags would not hurt. In any case, tetex-beta-20001218-3 and texmf-*' tags should be (kept) in sync. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
Re: comments on texmf package?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 05:18:49PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Hi, > > Probably I'm too impatient, but I've been waiting so long for a full > tex setup in Cygwin... Who will be looking at the new texmf packages? > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-01/msg00311.html I'm not at all familar with tex so I'd like to ask somebody else to look into these packages. The setup.hint files are looking ok to me. Did you pack using the correct paths as given on http://cygwin.com/setup.html#package_contents ? Another point: Aren't we still waiting for tetex-beta-20001218-3 leaving `test' state or did I miss something? IMO it doesn't make much sense to have these texmf packages in `curr' state if they depend on a `test' package. Opinions? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
comments on texmf package?
Hi, Probably I'm too impatient, but I've been waiting so long for a full tex setup in Cygwin... Who will be looking at the new texmf packages? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-01/msg00311.html Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
