Re: [PATCH] FAST_CWD: adjust the initial search scope
On Jan 11 20:48, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Jan 11 14:21, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > A *very* recent Windows build adds more code to the preamble of > > > RtlGetCurrentDirectory_U() so that the previous heuristic failed to > > > find the call to the locking routine. > > > > > > This only affects the 64-bit version of ntdll, where the 0xe8 byte is > > > now found at offset 40, not the 32-bit version. However, let's just > > > double the area we search for said byte for good measure. > > > > any chance to convince the powers that be to open up access to this > > datastructures without such hacky means? > > I try my best. Thanks! Patch pushed. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH] FAST_CWD: adjust the initial search scope
Hi Corinna, On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 11 14:21, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > A *very* recent Windows build adds more code to the preamble of > > RtlGetCurrentDirectory_U() so that the previous heuristic failed to > > find the call to the locking routine. > > > > This only affects the 64-bit version of ntdll, where the 0xe8 byte is > > now found at offset 40, not the 32-bit version. However, let's just > > double the area we search for said byte for good measure. > > any chance to convince the powers that be to open up access to this > datastructures without such hacky means? I try my best. Ciao, Johannes
Re: [PATCH] FAST_CWD: adjust the initial search scope
Hi Johannes, On Jan 11 14:21, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > A *very* recent Windows build adds more code to the preamble of > RtlGetCurrentDirectory_U() so that the previous heuristic failed to find > the call to the locking routine. > > This only affects the 64-bit version of ntdll, where the 0xe8 byte is > now found at offset 40, not the 32-bit version. However, let's just > double the area we search for said byte for good measure. any chance to convince the powers that be to open up access to this datastructures without such hacky means? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat signature.asc Description: PGP signature
