Re: Fix your packages! (attention: a2ps, tetex-bin, nfs-server, gv, uw-imap, and xerces-c maintainers)

2006-10-01 Thread Angelo Graziosi

'cygcheck -c --verbose' says:
--
...
tetex3.0.0-3OK
Missing file: /etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh from package tetex-base
tetex-base   3.0.0-3Incomplete
tetex-bin3.0.0-3OK
tetex-devel  3.0.0-3OK
tetex-doc3.0.0-3OK
Missing file: /etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh from package tetex-extra
tetex-extra  3.0.0-3Incomplete
Missing file: /etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh from package tetex-tiny
tetex-tiny   3.0.0-3Incomplete
...
--


Cheers,

   Angelo

On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:

 On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
 
  Could this be the reason for which I obtain that
 
  tetex-base   3.0.0-3Incomplete
  tetex-extra  3.0.0-3Incomplete
  tetex-tiny   3.0.0-3Incomplete
 
  from cygcheck -c, even if I reinstall them ?
 
 No.  That message referred to CRLF line endings.  Cygcheck does not report
 those.
 
 To find out exactly why cygcheck complains, use the --verbose option.
   Igor
 -- 
   http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
   |\  _,,,---,,_  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_  Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
  |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski
 '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL   a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!
 
 Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte.
 But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
 that! -- Rostand, Cyrano de Bergerac
 


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: 1.5.21: startxwin.sh works, startxwin.bat does not work

2006-10-01 Thread Scott Fordin

René Berber wrote:

Scott Fordin wrote:


Thanks again for replying, René. Sorry it took me a couple of
days to get back to you. My responses are embedded below.


OK, it seems that the startxserver is not even a valid script (I
haven't tested, I don't have Singular, I'm saying that from the
result you had).


Strange thing though is that it does work on another machine.


Question: Why were you trying to start XWin with that bat file?  I
don't know what it is for, but seems redundant.


Well, the way things install, a Start X Server shortcut is
installed on the desktop. It's more handy than opening a bash
shell and then running startx from there. I've tried configuring
a similar shortcut for startx, but I can't get it to work. Since
startxwin.bat fails with the same error as startxserver.bat, I
can't just use that on the desktop instead. I don't have a
standalone version of Perl installed, so I can't run the .sh
version of the script. I don't know how else to do it. I looked,
but I didn't find an answer, but do you know of a way I can pass
a shell command to bash.exe from the Windows command prompt?


I then tried the /usr/X11R6/bin/startxwin.bat script and got
the same error.

[snip]

Now to the real problem: are the files different?


There are differences, but none seems significant vis a vis
this particular problem. I've attached the diff output. I
can't even figure out where the lapack libraries are being
called...


They should be.  There is no reference to the Singular directory in
the normal startxwin.bat file... check for symbolic or hard links,
perhaps Singular's (post)installation is doing something wrong.

I see no other explanation for getting the same error message.


Thanks again,

Scott
5c5
 REM
---
 REM 
10c10
 REM example, if you installed Cygwin in \foo\bar\baz\cygwin, you will need
---
 REM example, if you installed Cygwin in \foo\bar\baz\cygwin, you will need 
20a21
 SET RUN=%CYGWIN_ROOT%\bin\run -p /usr/X11R6/bin
145c146,166
 run XWin -multiwindow -clipboard -silent-dup-error
\ No newline at end of file
---
 %RUN% XWin -multiwindow -clipboard -silent-dup-error
 
 
 REM Startup an xterm, using bash as the shell.
 
 %RUN% xterm -e /usr/bin/bash -l
 
 
 REM
 REM Startup the twm window manager.
 REM WARNING: Do not use an external window manager in conjunction with
 REM the ``-multiwindow'' command-line parameter for XWin.  Doing so
 REM would start two window managers, which is never supposed to happen.
 REM
 
 REM %RUN% twm
 
 
 REM Set a background color.  Only needed when not using -multwindow for XWin.
 
 REM %RUN% xsetroot -solid aquamarine4

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/

Re: 1.5.21: startxwin.sh works, startxwin.bat does not work

2006-10-01 Thread René Berber
Scott Fordin wrote:
[snip]
 Strange thing though is that it does work on another machine.

Very strange, the differences you sent don't show an invalid script at all.  
One of the 2 files has \r\n endings (that's the reason for the first 2 
differences) but as long as they are being executed by command.com it doesn't 
matter.

[snip]
 Well, the way things install, a Start X Server shortcut is
 installed on the desktop. It's more handy than opening a bash
 shell and then running startx from there. I've tried configuring
 a similar shortcut for startx, but I can't get it to work.

You can create a shortcut to startx.sh and then edit its Properties so the 
target ends up like: C:\cygwin\bin\run.exe -p /usr/X11R6/bin/ bash --login -c 
startx 
[Ref:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin.xfree/16545]

I use a shortcut to start X Windows only (no xterm):

C:\cygwin\bin\run.exe -p /usr/X11R6/bin XWin -multiwindow -clipboard 
-silent-dup-error -dpi 100

 Since
 startxwin.bat fails with the same error as startxserver.bat, I
 can't just use that on the desktop instead. I don't have a
 standalone version of Perl installed, so I can't run the .sh
 version of the script. I don't know how else to do it. I looked,
 but I didn't find an answer, but do you know of a way I can pass
 a shell command to bash.exe from the Windows command prompt?

If your path includes the location of Cygwin's binaries you can use run as 
above.

[snip]
 There are differences, but none seems significant vis a vis
 this particular problem. I've attached the diff output. I
 can't even figure out where the lapack libraries are being
 called...

Nowhere... so what is being run?
-- 
René Berber


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/