Re: Upgrade broke Openbox

2009-03-14 Thread Arpel


Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
 
 Ouch.
 

Compiled 5 minutes ago with both 1.5 and 1.7 and still getting this
behaviour.
 

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
 
 Any advice for getting openbox back?
 
 The openbox package is extremely overdue for an update (distro: 0.99.1,
 upstream: 3.4.7.2).  There is a current version in Ports, but it has
 dependencies on glib2 and pango that will need to be updated in the
 distro first.  All I can say is to hang on for a little while until we
 can get all these other packages sorted out.
 
 Yaakov
 Cygwin/X
 

Any update on this point, 0.99.1 is still here ...

I think we are some here that will appreciate having this very small (but
smart and beautiful) window manager back !
Is there anything I might try to get it start correctly ?

Thanks,
Arpel.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Upgrade-broke-Openbox-tp20487999p22512089.html
Sent from the cygwin-xfree mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: Upgrade broke Openbox

2009-03-14 Thread Arpel


Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
 
 Ouch.
 

Compiled 5 minutes ago with both 1.5 and 1.7 and still getting this
behaviour.
 

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
 
 Any advice for getting openbox back?
 
 The openbox package is extremely overdue for an update (distro: 0.99.1,
 upstream: 3.4.7.2).  There is a current version in Ports, but it has
 dependencies on glib2 and pango that will need to be updated in the
 distro first.  All I can say is to hang on for a little while until we
 can get all these other packages sorted out.
 
 Yaakov
 Cygwin/X
 

Any update on this point, 0.99.1 is still here ...

I think we are some here that will appreciate having this very small (but
smart and beautiful) window manager back !
Is there anything I might try to get it start correctly ?

Thanks,
Arpel.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Upgrade-broke-Openbox-tp20487999p22512103.html
Sent from the cygwin-xfree mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



setup.exe crashes when removing xorg-server

2009-03-14 Thread Mirko Vukovic
Hello,

After (actually during) my last cygwin update, the installation
procedure crashes when setup tries to uninstall xorg-server.  I am
running on windows XP

I have updated to the latest setup.exe (2.573.2.3),  and rebooted.  I
do not see any x-processes in either task manager or windows services.
 What are my other options other than a complete re-install?  (I
looked to see if I could manually remove the package, but I did not
see any posts on that).  I also tried hiding bash.lst.gz, but that did
not help.

Thanks,

Mirko

(Sorry for cross-posting.  I was not sure which mailing list this
topic would fall under)

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



xterm Home/End keycodes

2009-03-14 Thread Andy Koppe
I'm a bit confused about those. They didn't change during the xorg
transition, did they? I could have sworn they sent VT220-style ^[[1;
and ^[[4; but actually they send PC-style ^[[H and ^[[F. Of course I
should have realised this when I changed F1 to F4 to PC-style codes in
MinTTY ...

D'oh,
Andy

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: xterm Home/End keycodes

2009-03-14 Thread Thomas Dickey

On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Andy Koppe wrote:


I'm a bit confused about those. They didn't change during the xorg
transition, did they? I could have sworn they sent VT220-style ^[[1;
and ^[[4; but actually they send PC-style ^[[H and ^[[F. Of course I
should have realised this when I changed F1 to F4 to PC-style codes in
MinTTY ...


PC-style is the upstream default (I don't recall whether cygwin's
older package modified the app-defaults files).

--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: xterm Home/End keycodes

2009-03-14 Thread Thomas Dickey

On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Andy Koppe wrote:


2009/3/15 Thomas Dickey dic...@his.com:

I'm a bit confused about those. They didn't change during the xorg
transition, did they? I could have sworn they sent VT220-style ^[[1;
and ^[[4; but actually they send PC-style ^[[H and ^[[F. Of course I
should have realised this when I changed F1 to F4 to PC-style codes in
MinTTY ...


PC-style is the upstream default (I don't recall whether cygwin's
older package modified the app-defaults files).


Thanks, I think my confusion actually stemmed from starting with PuTTY
code, which sends VT220-style keys when set to Xterm mode.


I tend to ignore PuTTY's keyboard options, since they don't really
match xterm's options.


I note that Debian uses PC-style too. Is this issue fairly settled
then, i.e. do most systems use the PC-style keycodes for their xterm
terminfo entries?


PC-style's the default since a long time ago when the keyboard tables were 
constructed for the PC keyboards.


I implemented the VT220-style editing-keypad as something that could 
change from that default, but (aside from one of the terminfo's several 
years ago using VT220), xterm's used the PC-style since I've been working 
on it in 1996.


--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: Upgrade broke Openbox

2009-03-14 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Arpel wrote:
 Compiled 5 minutes ago with both 1.5 and 1.7 and still getting this
 behaviour.

That version of openbox is ancient, so I'm not entirely surprised.

 Any update on this point, 0.99.1 is still here ...
 
 I think we are some here that will appreciate having this very small (but
 smart and beautiful) window manager back !
 Is there anything I might try to get it start correctly ?

Current versions of openbox require glib2 and pango, which are both
horribly outdated in the distro.  With Cygwin development focus shifting
to 1.7, first I need to rebuild X, update those deps (adding any new
prereqs along the way), then I can adopt and update openbox.


Yaakov
Cygwin/X

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkm8jpAACgkQpiWmPGlmQSPcQACg3hVvvLLy3XMqeHOCs7ef5KG0
AB8AoIzZNowFCeeXsIR03FYNhcJTn61g
=6fqI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/