Re: Incorporating .epsi files into TeX docs : failure
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Andrew Markebo wrote: Well there actually exists ghostscript-x11 packages, which I think ads the X11 functionality, for cygwin.. I had not checked the packagelist. @Fergus: Please install the ghostscript-x11 package and try again. bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Incorporating .epsi files into TeX docs : failure
/ Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | gs: Unknown device: x11 | | The ghostscript package was not compiled with X11 support. You can either | compile it yourself or ask the maintainer of ghostscript if he could provide | binaries with x11 support too. Well there actually exists ghostscript-x11 packages, which I think ads the X11 functionality, for cygwin.. Sorry if I missed something or.. just stumbled in now. /Andy -- Don't walk in front of me, I might be unable to follow you. Don't walk after me, I might be unable to lead you. Just walk by my side and be my friend. Please note, new email, @telia.com - @comhem.se
Re: Incorporating .epsi files into TeX docs : failure
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gs: Unknown device: x11 The ghostscript package was not compiled with X11 support. You can either compile it yourself or ask the maintainer of ghostscript if he could provide binaries with x11 support too. bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Incorporating .epsi files into TeX docs : failure
Thank you very much indeed. I put /usr/X11R6/bin/ before /usr/bin/ in the PATH so that the gs.exe I wanted was picked up before the other gs.exe I didn't want. Now it all works perfectly. I'll leave PATH defined like this (i.e. with the transposition). There may be other consequences, not all good, since I don't always start XWin ... we'll see. Thanks again. Fergus
