Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-18 Thread Keith D. Tyler
Sam Edge was recently quoted as saying...
 
 You wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 in gmane.os.cygwin.xfree on Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:13:10 +0200:
 
  oh how I miss the focus 
  follows mouse function within windows, just to mention one
 
 At the expense of being somewhat off topic and sounding like a
 Microsoft UI aficionado you can get this behaviour out of most
 versions of Windows if you install Microsoft Tweak UI. (Some versions
 need the XMouse powertoy instead - also from Microsoft.)

At the expense of sounding like a picky naysayer, XMouse never worked
consistently similar to any other X wm's focus-follows-mouse behaviour
that I ever used. And it will never work like Fvwm2 SloppyFocus, which
I've become addicted to. :)

As for rootless mode, I'd throw out some other caveats and
recommendations:

* I'm using a Win32 virtual pager. When XWin is active, even in rootless
mode, the window covers up the page in the virtual display. (Yes I know
why, and this is with JSPager, perhaps there are shape-aware virt pagers
for Win32.)

* I recommend running this mode with the X server set to run
always-on-top. Right now I'm using a tool called Make Always On Top to
make XWin.exe this way, perhaps I could suggest that XWin.exe include this
ability as a command-line and/or icon-menu option.

Right now I'm using Chris's patched binary, set sticky in my Win32 pager,
and Always On Top via that tool. I've moved my fvwm root-window menus to
be invoked via an added title button on all fvwm windows, and turned on
the titlebar for one of my X sticky windows so that I can always access 
it. I then get myself into the habit of manually minimizing X apps when I
need to use a large Win32 app. This is a bit of a minor inconvenience, but
the always-on-top has the benefit of making my X icons, winlist and pager
window always available.

In the meantime, I've trimmed off two pages of my X virtual desktop, two
pages off my Windows virtual desktop, and turned off the overhead caused
by my X root-pattern switcher (FvwmBacker). I'm enjoying this desktop
paradigm.

==
Keith D. Tyler[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Federal Way, WA  http://www.keithtyler.com
--
   If Tyrrany and Oppresion come to this land,
  it will be under the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
   - James Madison, U.S. President 1809-1817
==



Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-18 Thread Uwe Schmidtmann
Hallo Sam.

Sam Edge wrote:


At the expense of being somewhat off topic and sounding like a


and so on - at least avoid full qoute...

Guess I needed that - I had TweakUI already installed for some other 
reason but never checked the mouse options... sh...

By the way: This works absolutely positiv with the -rootless option of 
the new xwin binary. All looks like being integrated expcept copy/paste.

Thanks a lot!

Uwe




Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-18 Thread Keith D. Tyler
Uwe Schmidtmann was recently quoted as saying...
 Guess I needed that - I had TweakUI already installed for some other 
 reason but never checked the mouse options... sh...
 
 By the way: This works absolutely positiv with the -rootless option of 
 the new xwin binary. All looks like being integrated expcept copy/paste.

To get integrated copy/paste, you need xwinclip:

http://xfree86.cygwin.com/devel/xwinclip/

And warning: it tends to crash here and there, so be prepared to restart
it as needed. Some days I have to restart it once or twice. But it works
rather well.

HTH,

==
Keith D. Tyler[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Federal Way, WA  http://www.keithtyler.com
--
   If Tyrrany and Oppresion come to this land,
  it will be under the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
   - James Madison, U.S. President 1809-1817
==



Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-18 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Keith D. Tyler wrote:

 * I recommend running this mode with the X server set to run
 always-on-top. 

Why? 
You will never get the w32 windows in front of any x11 window. 

 Right now I'm using a tool called Make Always On Top to
 make XWin.exe this way, perhaps I could suggest that XWin.exe include this
 ability as a command-line and/or icon-menu option.

Feel free to add such a commandline option.

bye
ago
-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://www.gotti.org   ICQ: 126018723





Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-18 Thread Uwe Schmidtmann
Keith D. Tyler wrote:

At the expense of sounding like a picky naysayer, XMouse never worked
consistently similar to any other X wm's focus-follows-mouse behaviour
that I ever used. And it will never work like Fvwm2 SloppyFocus, which
I've become addicted to. :)


Maybe I was not clear enough with my posting (english is not my native 
language, sorry). What I am running is a combination of xmouse for the 
native windoze stuff and icewm managing the mouse focus for x11. This is 
not always flawless, but with icewm using the nice scheme windows and 
X11 almost look the same and the context switch between X and windoze 
works without having to click or press any weired keys.

This is extremely useful as I use nedit for editing my source code while 
using borland as a compiler. I am used to nedit for almost 7 years now 
and had extreme problems with editor integrated in borlands ide when I 
came to this job.

Sorry for being off topic again...

Maybe Harold Hunt could give a short hint on where to get the xwin.exe 
version with less logging... Thanks.

Regards and have a nice weekend.

Uwe




Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-18 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Uwe,

There is a preliminary Server Test Series - Test 67 release up at:

http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/XWin-Test67.exe.bz2 (~1,225 KB)


I say that this is preliminary because I built it from the HEAD branch, 
rather than from the 4.2.0 branch.  Thus, if you run xdpyinfo it will 
report a strange version number, whereas the usual releases report 4.2.0.

I am only putting this link up for those few brave soles that want to 
minimize logging before I can make an official release.

Harold

Uwe Schmidtmann wrote:

Keith D. Tyler wrote:


At the expense of sounding like a picky naysayer, XMouse never worked
consistently similar to any other X wm's focus-follows-mouse behaviour
that I ever used. And it will never work like Fvwm2 SloppyFocus, which
I've become addicted to. :)



Maybe I was not clear enough with my posting (english is not my native 
language, sorry). What I am running is a combination of xmouse for the 
native windoze stuff and icewm managing the mouse focus for x11. This 
is not always flawless, but with icewm using the nice scheme windows 
and X11 almost look the same and the context switch between X and 
windoze works without having to click or press any weired keys.

This is extremely useful as I use nedit for editing my source code 
while using borland as a compiler. I am used to nedit for almost 7 
years now and had extreme problems with editor integrated in borlands 
ide when I came to this job.

Sorry for being off topic again...

Maybe Harold Hunt could give a short hint on where to get the xwin.exe 
version with less logging... Thanks.

Regards and have a nice weekend.

Uwe






Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-18 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Holger,

You will probably want to grab that Test 67 preliminary release that I 
just posted... it has much better performance due to reduced logging. 
Take a look at your /tmp/XWin.log file, it is probably over 50 MB.

http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/XWin-Test67.exe.bz2

Harold

Holger Vogt wrote:

Hi all,

I have just installed XWin-Test66.exe over a very old Cygwin
installation (May 01, X-dlls March 01) on a Windows NT4 notebook. After
starting and a short DOS box pop up ... nothing happened.

But then there it was: a small green rectangle among all my Windows
icons stating sh.

Now my screen is full with applications (Xman, Xciruit drawing program,
MAGIC layout editor), and still the Windows background, Windows Netscape
and others.

Congratulations, great work.

Holger Vogt
 





Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-17 Thread Uwe Schmidtmann


Hi!

The rootless mode is much more interesting than the real one from 
other products (at least for me). One of the reasons for this is cygwins 
capability of still being able to use an X11 window manager (e.g. icewm) 
instead of the dump windows user interface (oh how I miss the focus 
follows mouse function within windows, just to mention one)...

I sometimes use a tail -f to follow some debug from a windows 
application compiled with borland and I definitely use nedit as my 
favourite editor (I came from the unix world). The first works much 
better when in rootless mode than being forced to switch from win to x 
and the other way round.

So - many useless words, but one tip:
Having icewm with the statusbar almost everything can be used as with 
fullscreen mode (Window managers menus are available via status bar). 
When icewm moves the complete window (I think that was called opaque 
move) even the problem with the invisible(?) window outline does not 
exists.

So GREAT WORK done there!

Bradey Honsinger wrote:
 I didn't see a mention of the argument to invoke the new rootless mode
 anywhere in this thread--no doubt it's in the updated man pages, but I just
 grabbed the Test66 binary. Logically enough, it's '-rootless':
 
 -rootless
 EXPERIMENTAL: Run the server in pseudo-rootless mode. 
 
 You don't appear to need the '-nodecoration' option when you use
 '-rootless'. Note that the output of 'XWin -help' goes to /tmp/XWin.log[1],
 a fact which I had forgotten.

I just used -rootless without any other options. Works fine. Window 
creation and movement slows down a little but when the windows are shown 
there seems to be no speed punishment for using the pseudo rootless mode.

 This is really cool--many thanks to Matsuzaki, Thomas, and Harold! It's a
 bit of a hack, but it looks very useful, and at the least it should get most
 of the 'Why doesn't cygwin-xfree work like my favorite commerial X server?'
 people off of Harold's back. I'll probably go back to full-screen 'rooted'
 mode, though--I _like_ hiding all of the Windows junk when I'm working in X.
 
   - Bradey
 

Just one question (little of topic in this thread): Has anyone 
succesfully used dfm with cygwin? It compiled flawless but when started 
it complains about dll`s missing in the path. That happened when trying 
to start a program or to change some preferences. (Funny enough those 
were cygwin1.dll and libX11.dll and the path was something like 
c:\cygwin\...) Maybe I just missed an existing patch (took dfm source 
from the projects homepage).

Regards,

Uwe






Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-17 Thread Sam Edge

You wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in gmane.os.cygwin.xfree on Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:13:10 +0200:

 oh how I miss the focus 
 follows mouse function within windows, just to mention one

At the expense of being somewhat off topic and sounding like a
Microsoft UI aficionado you can get this behaviour out of most
versions of Windows if you install Microsoft Tweak UI. (Some versions
need the XMouse powertoy instead - also from Microsoft.)

Windows 9x, Me, 2000:
http://www.microsoft.com/ntworkstation/downloads/PowerToys/Networking/NTTweakUI.asp

Windows XP:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/downloads/powertoys.asp

XMouse (95):
http://www.microsoft.com/windows95/downloads/contents/wutoys/w95pwrtoysset/default.asp

This might make working with X and Windows WMs at the same time
slightly more consistent.

-- 
Sam Edge



Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-17 Thread Harold L Hunt II

Bradey,

Thanks for pointing that out.  I added the -rootless command-line arg to 
the patch that Matsuzaki sent in, so Test66 and XFree86-xserv-4.2.0-13 
are different than the release that Thomas Chadwick made.

This version of a rootless mode is precisely what I was aiming for: 
something simple that can be built off of.  I had no idea that it would 
be quite that simple though!  :)

Now it is only a matter of time until we implement all of the little 
features that will make rootless mode complete.

Harold

Bradey Honsinger wrote:

I didn't see a mention of the argument to invoke the new rootless mode
anywhere in this thread--no doubt it's in the updated man pages, but I just
grabbed the Test66 binary. Logically enough, it's '-rootless':

-rootless
EXPERIMENTAL: Run the server in pseudo-rootless mode. 

You don't appear to need the '-nodecoration' option when you use
'-rootless'. Note that the output of 'XWin -help' goes to /tmp/XWin.log[1],
a fact which I had forgotten.

This is really cool--many thanks to Matsuzaki, Thomas, and Harold! It's a
bit of a hack, but it looks very useful, and at the least it should get most
of the 'Why doesn't cygwin-xfree work like my favorite commerial X server?'
people off of Harold's back. I'll probably go back to full-screen 'rooted'
mode, though--I _like_ hiding all of the Windows junk when I'm working in X.

  - Bradey

[1] http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-04/msg00504.html
  





Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-16 Thread Bradey Honsinger

I didn't see a mention of the argument to invoke the new rootless mode
anywhere in this thread--no doubt it's in the updated man pages, but I just
grabbed the Test66 binary. Logically enough, it's '-rootless':

-rootless
EXPERIMENTAL: Run the server in pseudo-rootless mode. 

You don't appear to need the '-nodecoration' option when you use
'-rootless'. Note that the output of 'XWin -help' goes to /tmp/XWin.log[1],
a fact which I had forgotten.

This is really cool--many thanks to Matsuzaki, Thomas, and Harold! It's a
bit of a hack, but it looks very useful, and at the least it should get most
of the 'Why doesn't cygwin-xfree work like my favorite commerial X server?'
people off of Harold's back. I'll probably go back to full-screen 'rooted'
mode, though--I _like_ hiding all of the Windows junk when I'm working in X.

  - Bradey

[1] http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-04/msg00504.html