X11R7 and rebasing

2008-11-19 Thread Angelo Graziosi

I have seen that after the release of X11R7, many problems are partially
resolved by rebasing. Some time ago, I remember that on cigwin-apps list
there was the suggestion that the package maintainer should build their
packages adding '-Wl,--enable-auto-image-base' for DLLs.

Has this be done for the recent release?

If 'yes', just for curiosity, where, than, this need of rebasing comes from?


Thanks,
   Angelo.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: X11R7 and rebasing

2008-11-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 19 14:30, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
 I have seen that after the release of X11R7, many problems are partially
 resolved by rebasing. Some time ago, I remember that on cigwin-apps list
 there was the suggestion that the package maintainer should build their
 packages adding '-Wl,--enable-auto-image-base' for DLLs.

 Has this be done for the recent release?

 If 'yes', just for curiosity, where, than, this need of rebasing comes 
 from?

--enable-auto-image-base is not a 100% solution because there is none.
It just can ease the pain somewhat.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader  cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: X11R7 and rebasing

2008-11-19 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Angelo Graziosi wrote:
 I have seen that after the release of X11R7, many problems are partially
 resolved by rebasing. Some time ago, I remember that on cigwin-apps list
 there was the suggestion that the package maintainer should build their
 packages adding '-Wl,--enable-auto-image-base' for DLLs.
 
 Has this be done for the recent release?
 
 If 'yes', just for curiosity, where, than, this need of rebasing comes
 from?

libtool.


Yaakov
Cygwin/X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkkkMjkACgkQpiWmPGlmQSMvNACgrqb/4f3a4kTSqPMOCrH3ZZjV
QZYAoNMNgO+6XVlMgx4vQ8n96aWHs5g0
=kD75
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: X11R7 and rebasing

2008-11-19 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How's that? What, exactly, does libtool have to do with cygwin's fork
 emulation code?
 
 The closest libtool comes to this issue is the fact that it
 automatically turns on enable-auto-image-base -- which should help
 somewhat alleviate the problem (although, as Corinna pointed out
 earlier, it's not a panacea).

Sorry, I misread and thought, based on the flow of the message, that the
last question was how the enable-auto-image-base was done.  Indeed
libtool is part of the solution and not the cause.


Yaakov
Cygwin/X

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkkk6WoACgkQpiWmPGlmQSOmLACgvvwMaUAouTt/dbkaX+xNmE5P
wsQAoKt7ln0Opmogs1rYsIgEQ7l+75ee
=YlvX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/