excuse this test

2008-11-13 Thread Paul McFerrin

excuse this test, it *should* get rejected



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: excuse this test

2008-11-13 Thread Matt Wozniski
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Paul McFerrin wrote:
 excuse this test, it *should* get rejected

The cygwin lists are public, anyone can post to them even if not
subscribed.  This wasn't a useful test to see if your unsubscribe
worked.

~Matt

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: excuse this test

2008-11-13 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin X)

Matt Wozniski wrote:

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Paul McFerrin wrote:

excuse this test, it *should* get rejected


The cygwin lists are public, anyone can post to them even if not
subscribed.  This wasn't a useful test to see if your unsubscribe
worked.


Indeed!  There is also no reason to spam the list with this kind of
test.  The mailing lists have many portals that can be used to see
messages coming to them.  The Cygwin site itself has access at
http://cygwin.com/lists.html.  If you need to see if email is
going to the list and not to you, just check the list in question
before and after subscribing.  This is a better way to double-check
your efforts than spamming the list.


--
Larry Hall  http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.  (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.  (508) 429-6305 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/