ADV: Legal Gambling from your home
Title: Legal Gambling Now Did you know that you could gamble legally where you live without having to go to a city that has legalized it? There are tons of gaming casinos online but I thought I would send you links to some of the best ones that are out there with the biggest pay offs and the most amount of consumer confidence. Below are links to some of the best online casinos and you can play with your credit card through completely safe and secure transactions. You can have your winnings credited to your credit card as soon as you win them. Check them out for yourself. Just click on the links and have fun winning money! Metro Casino Riverboat Casino (multiplayer capable) Prestige Casino Five Star Casino
adult 18up please Jobs!!!
for free adult live sex action click below, http://www.intergal.com/cgi-bin/BAN_record?e1032151/003c65/1 FREE 3 DAY MEMBERSHIP! http://www.intergal.com/cgi-bin/BAN_record?e1032151/003b020089/101 DON'T FORGET THIS! this is a one-time mailing, send comments to; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FREE Internet Marketing eNewsletter!
I received your e-mail as someone interested in Internet Business Opportunities. If I received your e-mail in error, or you are no longer interested, click here to be removed. Be sure REMOVE is in the Subject Title and you will not be contacted again: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=remove ** Greetings Fellow Net Marketer! If your serious about internet marketing. You'll want to learn all you can to succeed. Naturally you'll want the most cutting edge marketing techniques available to help you write those killer ads. We would like to offer you a FREE subscription to Smart-Hits, a monthly newsletter that includes a new business opportunity or two, an info packed internet marketing article with the latest internet marketing tips and techniques, inspiration, and free information. It's absolutely free! The promo ideas alone are worth a fortune. Can you imagine what it would be like to put your promotions miles ahead of the pack? You can get these benefits Now ! This months issue reveals a new technological software breakthrough that will allow you to speed up your internet connection at cable and ADSL speeds or faster without any added hardware. This is a must see opportunity! You can unsubscribed anytime if you're not completely satisfied. I guarantee when you subscribe you will receive some of the most valuable information available today. Subscribe and see! Just send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe smarthts in the subject field. * FREE-- With Your Subscription! POWER WORDS -- Discover the proven words that will penetrate your prospect's resistance and motivate them to buy. Subscribe Now! * K.G. Allen Associates 2955 N. McCarran Blvd.#202-107 Sparks Nv. 89431 *
Artificial intelligence filter blocks news -- but not smut
Some pornographic images BAIR approved as OK and a Perl test-script: http://www.well.com/user/declan/bair/ http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,36923,00.html Smut Filter Blocks All But Smut by Declan McCullagh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 3:00 a.m. Jun. 20, 2000 PDT When Exotrope Inc. introduced its BAIR smut-blocking software last year, everyone seemed wowed by the company's claims of intelligent filtering. New York Governor George Pataki applauded Exotrope's "state-of-the-art technology," Tucows Network gave BAIR five stars, and PC Magazine handed the program a coveted editor's choice award. But an investigation by Wired News shows that BAIR's "artificial intelligence" does not work as advertised. In tests of hundreds of images, BAIR incorrectly blocked dozens of photographs including portraits, landscapes, animals, and street scenes. It banned readers from viewing news photos at time.com and newsweek.com, but rated images of oral sex, group sex, and masturbation as acceptable for youngsters. Company representatives say they can't explain the program's seemingly random behavior. "I agree with you. There's something wrong," says Dave Epler, Exotrope operations manager. "That's not the way our image server is supposed to be working." Exotrope, a privately held firm based in Elmira, New York, claims to have developed "the industry's most advanced software system" for intelligently blocking sexually explicit images. BAIR stands for Basic Artificial Intelligence Routine. Epler said BAIR's smart-filtering, introduced in March 1999, had worked in the past. But he was unable to produce any version of the program that performed as described. Artificial intelligence experts say training a neural network to work the way BAIR supposedly does would be impossible. Anti-filtering advocates go a step further, and say Exotrope hoodwinked journalists and politicians into believing hype about advanced "artificial intelligence" and "active information matrix" routines. "I think all manufacturers of blocking software have suckered journalists and politicians to some extent by claiming it is more accurate than it really is," said Bennett Haselton, founder of Peacefire.org. "This is an unusual case because we're talking about a product with a zero percent accuracy rate." One reason why reviewers could have been mistaken is that Exotrope, like its competitors, has assembled a massive list of off-limits websites. If an image appears on one of those blacklisted sites, or if it has words like "sex" in the filename, BAIR automatically restricts it. It also will block access based on keywords elsewhere on the Web page. Wired News tested BAIR by creating a Perl program to extract images randomly from an 87MB database of thousands of both pornographic and non-pornographic photographs. The program then assigned each of those images random numbers as file names. The random number requires BAIR to evaluate the graphic with its "neural network" filtering to determine whether an image is sexually explicit or not. The sex-themed images came from Usenet newsgroups such as alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.female and alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.male. The results were dramatic: BAIR inexplicably blocked between 90 and 95 percent of the photographs with no regard for whether they were sexually explicit or not. Of the ones that were OK'd, about half were pornographic and half weren't. BAIR incorrectly blocked photographs of Yellowstone, the Baltimore waterfront, Snoopy, boats, sunsets, dogs, vegetables and even a Wired News staff meeting. It rated as acceptable for minors -- even on the most restrictive setting -- explicit images of oral sex, anal sex, group sex, masturbation, and ejaculation. Exotrope officials say they plan to fix the errors within the next month. BAIR works by funneling Web connections through Exotrope's proxy server, which the company says is malfunctioning. "We're working through our image server problems as we speak," says Exotrope's Epler. "We'll have this thing up in less than 30 days. You caught us at a bad time. I know it works very well. I did accuracy tests on this thing 30, 60 days ago and it was perfect. It went south." When asked if Exotrope has a backup copy of a working image-recognition routine that was introduced in March 1999 and could be installed on another proxy server, Epler said he did not. "I certainly don't know of a copy," he said. Epler also said he could not release a copy of the image-recognition routine that runs on the server, even under condition of a nondisclosure agreement. Dave Touretzky, a senior research scientist in the computer science department at Carnegie Mellon University, doubts Exotrope's claims. "How do you tell the difference between a woman in a bikini in a sailboat which is not racy and a naked woman in a sailboat?" Touretzky asks. "The only difference is a couple of nipples and a patch of pubic hair. You're not going to be able to find
Bravo on your $325 US win!
Title: $$$ Segasolutions and InstaLotto.net are the proud sponsors of the first ever "Web Casino Giveaway" Congratulations, your latest visit to one of our sites entered your chance to win.and you have won ! Web Casino Giveaway --the ultimate collection of interactive casino games on CD ($99.00) (3D imaging and 3D sound with unlimited free updates) --Free ATM-GOLD internet banking services account ($49.00) (2 year unlimited no-fee transactions services) --Mr. Maximillian's bestseller" Beat the Odds "online book ($19.00) (instructions to gamble to win and 30 day free membership) --lucky start $25.00 bonus dollars of casino chips ($25.00) (comps for you to play and win on us) --instant cash bonus on your 1st casino chips purchase(up to $125.00) Your complete Web Casino Package is absolutely free and yours to keep and will be delivered express mail along with your chance to win millions of additional Bonus Dollars and Instant prizes. To claim your prize please fax this sheet with your mailing address and email within the next 7 days to 1-514-285-9288 Please complete with block letters. Name: Address: E-mail: Telephone DISCLAIMER Delivered by Segasolutions to opt-ins and referrals only. All winners must be 21 years old and over and a credit card holder and depositor. This message is in full compliance with Federal requirements for commercial email and cannot be considered SPAM since it includes a remove mechanism. remove If the remove link is not active please contact your ISP webmaster, network administrator and their backbone provider to demand why they disrupted the remove link and made it impossible for you to have your email removed from our lists. Please understand that there is a conspiracy strictly economically driven that would like to charge marketing companies like ours for delivering messages. All companies must be given a fair opportunity to market on the internet regardless of their size contrary to the vision held by a few control-seeking major providers. These companies are presently funding anti-spam groups and refuse to recognize the difference between legitimate bulk email marketers and spammers. If permitted their action will be the beginning of restricting and controlling access to the internet.
ANNOUNCE 6/20 Xerox PARC -- Life in an Era of Cryptographic Abundance
I guess those of us who don't live near Palo Alto are just out of luck. How unfortunate, if this conference lives up to its potential. - - - Begin forwarded message - - - Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:00:23 PDT From: Teresa Lunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upcoming crypto symposium---taping/broadcast/transcripts? We are not going to distribute tapes or broadcast the talks. Sorry, Teresa - - - End forwarded message - - -
Tired of Internet Filters Refusing, Beaver College Bows ToPressure And Changes Name
= Beaver College bows to pressure and changes name Author: Connie Langland State: PA, Country: United States URL: http://web.philly.com/content/inquirer/2000/06/13/city/BEAVER13.htm Description: "In a closed-door meeting Friday, the college's board of trustees voted, 23-1, to abandon the troublesome title for ... what? 'Something else,' college spokesman Bill Avington said." They are tired of Internet filters refusing access to the college's sites. (6/13/00) ** Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per month) Matthew Gaylor,1933 E. Dublin-Granville Rd., PMB 176, Columbus, OH 43229 Archived at http://www.egroups.com/list/fa/ **
Re: Tired of Internet Filters Refusing, Beaver College Bows ToPressure And Changes Name
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Lizard wrote: Matthew Gaylor wrote: = Beaver College bows to pressure and changes name Author: Connie Langland State: PA, Country: United States URL: http://web.philly.com/content/inquirer/2000/06/13/city/BEAVER13.htm Description: "In a closed-door meeting Friday, the college's board of trustees voted, 23-1, to abandon the troublesome title for ... what? 'Something else,' college spokesman Bill Avington said." They are tired of Internet filters refusing access to the college's sites. (6/13/00) It seems to me this is AMPLE grounds for a defamation lawsuit. Pity the college board chose to switch rather than fight. What about references to the mascot of MIT? Or references to the state animal of Oregon. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Note to AOL users: for a quick shortcut to reply Alan Olsen| to my mail, just hit the ctrl, alt and del keys. "In the future, everything will have its 15 minutes of blame."
RE: Re: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK
At 10:00 AM 6/20/00 -0400, you wrote: Like I said. I haven't figured out a way around tilt yet. At least not on a moving ship. I figured that a box like this should almost have a accelerometer, and gyroscope compass/artificial horizon, as part of the motherboard. It was just the power outage that I could figure a way around. Actually, if you made the cord of a certain length, with 2 extra wires, One, an antennae, that is constantly checked to insure that it has the same resonance frequency that it has had since boot-up, this 'wire' being a foil sheath wrapped around the other wires, and another, using the common ground to complete the circuit, that hooks up to a momentary normally closed button, set either right between the 3 prongs, or right under one of the plugs, let's say ground, you would have an even easier time. Especially if the plugins were recessed in a 1 inch deep, 1 inch wide hole. Thus, splicing the cable results in a change to the resonance frequancy of the shielding, while unpluging it sets off the button in the plug. Yes, theoretically. However, you'd have to use some kind of truely fancy technology to move a box off of a sea platform without jolting, tilting, rotating, or accellerating above some (pretty damn small) limit. If I wanted to get elaborate, I could also stick in a GPS or other receiver and watch for changes in location or the relative strengths of the radio spectrum bands (is the BBC suddenly getting stronger relative to Radio Luxemburg?). I suspect that it can be made *very* difficult to relocate. You do have me on the encrypted drive, though. Good luck, Sean
Re: Tired of Internet Filters Refusing, Beaver College Bows ToPressure And Changes Name
At 6:10 PM -0700 6/20/00, Tim May wrote: At 4:54 PM -0700 6/20/00, Lizard wrote: Matthew Gaylor wrote: = Beaver College bows to pressure and changes name Author: Connie Langland State: PA, Country: United States URL: http://web.philly.com/content/inquirer/2000/06/13/city/BEAVER13.htm Description: "In a closed-door meeting Friday, the college's board of trustees voted, 23-1, to abandon the troublesome title for ... what? 'Something else,' college spokesman Bill Avington said." They are tired of Internet filters refusing access to the college's sites. (6/13/00) It seems to me this is AMPLE grounds for a defamation lawsuit. Pity the college board chose to switch rather than fight. What about references to the mascot of MIT? More nonsense about "defamation lawsuits"? In a free society a person or group or company is free to give advice about sites to visit, restaurants to eat in, films to see or not see. If a filter company is dumb enough to have filters which reject on the word "beaver" alone, and if customers are dumb enough to use these filters, so be it. In a free society there is no grounds for either state intervention or lawsuit. (Remember, lawsuits hinge on "matters of law." There is no conceivable matter of law here.) If I tell you should not see a movie because it stars Woody Allen, when, in fact, Woody Allen is not in the movie, the issue is not my telling you to not see the movie, but my lying about the contents. If I tell you "Do not eat at Joe's Diner, the food stinks", that is my right -- if I tell you "Do not eat at Joe's Diner, he serves dead alley cats in his meat loaf", then I am committing both fraud and defamation. (Assuming that Joe does not use felines as an ingredient in his cuisine, and that I knew this.) If I declare that a web page 'contains pornography', when it does not, I am committing an act of fraud (lying about the contents of the page) and an act of defamation (stating the page owner is distributing pornography). If someone were to attempt to sell a perpetual motion machine, even the most libertarian of folk would consider it to be inherently fraudulent. No contract made for such a device can be considered legally or morally valid, because one party CANNOT, as a matter of universal law, fulfill the terms of it. Anyone is, indeed, free to give advice about what to do or not do, see or not see, read or not read. They are NOT free to blatantly lie about goods or services, especially not to the detriment of the provider of such services. Point blank -- it is time the censors knew fear. Let them cower and quake for once. One succesful lawsuit on 'false blocking' and the entire censorware business would be exterminated -- no company can manage anything approaching reasonable accuracy. This is one of those very rare cases where the mechanisms of oppression can be turned on the oppressors for minimal risk.
