Re: hey
High explosive inserted rectally should do the trick nicely...go ahead, try it, you'll never forget it. On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Jon Ha-Ha wrote: > hi > > are you in the know of making little bangs? > i wondered if you can help me make a little bang... > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > -- I like myself, but I won't say I'm as handsome as the bull that kidnapped Europa. -- Marcus Tullius Cicero John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
hay
hay man was up? i was woundering if yuo could send me blue prints on how to make a pipe bomb that would be great i have a science project and i need to make one thanks a lot.send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: comments on proposed mixmaster v3 protocol
Thanks for your comments, Adam. Your ideas intrigue me; one in particular catches my attention at the moment. Yesterday, Adam Back wrote: > http://www.eskimo.com/~rowdenw/crypt/Mix/draft-moeller-v3-01.txt > > Some comments on the proposed mixmaster 3 protocol (see above). [snip] > I suspect that's a little long, and it might be better to make > the thing more efficient by having a 18k payload and 2k header > and have a max of 30 or so hops (depending on remailer address > lengths). Regarding chain lengths, we could learn from the practical experience with the current anonymous remailer network: Statistics are available in alt.privacy.anon-server for chains of length 2, and in some cases of length 3. This is partly to avoid placing a large load on the network for gathering statistics. Posts in a.p.a-s don't suggest that there is regular use of longer chains, however. I haven't seen a sample size large enough to draw a statistically valid conclusion, but anecdotal evidence and personal experience suggest that reliability decreases dramatically for longer chains. Does anybody have some contrary evidence? Consequently, until the network is more reliable, even the current 20 hop maximum is more than sufficient. Like you suggest, reducing the header and increasing the payload would be better than increasing potential chain lengths, if the headers can be more efficient. This reasoning begs the question as to *why* longer chains are so much less reliable. Depending on the threat model, hypotheses range from the analysis by RProcess on one hand to the statement that "the network is run by volunteers, after all" on the other. I'd like to see the version 3 protocol incorporate strategies for increasing reliability so that we could test some of these hypotheses. -- -William PGP key: http://www.eskimo.com/~rowdenw/pgp/rowdenw.asc until 2000-08-01 Fingerprint: FB4B E2CD 25AF 95E5 ADBB DA28 379D 47DB 599E 0B1AA When they find out who *you* are they'll pad the cell.
REJECTED PORNOGRAPHY: Re: Bush News 06/30/00 !New Format!
At 7:07 PM -0400 6/30/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *** P O S T I N GR E J E C T E D *** Dear BushNews, We are sorry, but your post has been rejected by our pornography filter. At least one of the words in your post is one of our indicators that obscene or salacious material is at your site. If you are interested in screening your material with our filter, it may be purchased for $179.95. We are here to protect the children. --Timothy May, Esq., Director, Internet Screening
check out our commission plan
Hi, SIGNUP AT http://www.smallbizffa.net/deal.pl?28197 SHOPON LINE http://wwwld.net/?moore132 Go see the value.
nombre del programa
nesecito ayuda o el nombre del programa de lacalizacion pasiva de telefonos moviles enviar respuesta a [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ http://www.latinmail.com. Gratuito, latino y en español.
check out our commission plan
Hi, SIGNUP AT http://www.smallbizffa.net/deal.pl?28197 SHOPON LINE http://wwwld.net/?moore132 Go see the value.
Re: jolly roger
Cypherpunks is already aiding the stupid.. I mean look at the amount of spam that comes into this list. It's mind boggling!! I've actually downloaded and installed Outlook Express for the sole purpose of using a filtering agent that interfaces with it. *shudder* > I wonder how they are getting pointers to the list. In my more paranoid > moments I imagine certain Agents of the TLA (Hi Jeff!) pointing them here > hoping to get Cypherpunks shut down due to an "Aiding the Stupid" charge > or drive out the regulars due to all the clueless twits showing up. Either > way it seems more and more like a form of denial of service attack.
iinformation
send me details
Re: Info Requested This Is Great News!
Thanks for requesting the info on this State of the Art New Service! Get ready to save a ton of money! We can`t lower the gas prices, but we can offset them with this news! Every Month I open my phone bill it is a SHOCK! Then, I was introduced to this Fixed Rate Long Distance Service that did not charge by the minute! You pay ONE FIXED RATE & Talk All You Want! Anywhere in the Continential US, 24 Hrs a Day, 7 Days a Week! $59 a month!!! Fiber Optic Lines! Crystal Clear! No Echos! No Busy Signals! Now when I open my bill, I KNOW in advance what it will be... Regardless of how much I use it! Just $59 a month! 24/7 Unlimited! They even have a weekend and evening plan as low as $35! Unlimited You can sign up on line! Reply with "More Info" in subject line. NEWS FLASH!!! NEW ARRIVAL!!! International Flat Rate! Call ANYWHERE in the WORLDFlat Rate Unlimited for as low as $89!!! You did read that right...International Flat Rate...$89! To get the info to sign up, just reply with "More Info" in the subject line. Thanks a Trillion! I have used this for 4 months now. My bills were $240 to $310 a monthNot Anymore! I`d Rather Keep My Money! To be removed, simply reply with remove and we will promptly do that for you. This is a ONE TIME Notice. You will not receive any further messages from us. Again, Thank You! We appreciate your valuable time.
Would like to know if anyone knows about sb3100 or the sb2100
I have a SB3100 cable modem and would like to know if there is anyone that know how to or has the program to access the cable modem? I would like to see if there is a way to speed my modem up a bit.. thanks Mark Galliart
