Re: The sound of silence?
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Anonymous wrote: :Critics say Echelon is used to steal trade :secrets from nonparticipants and allows the five countries to monitor one :another's citizens. (The charge is ironic. Even congressional watchdogs :say the NSA abides scrupulously by 1970s laws against spying on :Americans.) *What* "congressional watchdog" said *this*? ROTFLMAO! Must be the same "congressional watchdog" that cut the NSA's legal budget this year to remind them to not refuse the answering of questions of Congress... :© U.S.News & World Report Inc. All rights reserved. Shouldn't this read "U.S. National Security Agency", all rights reserved? Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Now open to the public: The X-No-Archive Library! Thousands of UseNet posts that the authors thought were "gone forever". Indexed and fully searchable: http://archives.mfn.org Now you CAN prove what was said by the DataBabysex/Burnore crowd!
Re:FROG REMAILER (fwd)
This was forwarded to me and I thought many of you would be interested as well.If correct (this is UNVERIFIED), it appears that the FROG remailer is not very annonymous at all. Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:23:59 -0600 From: lart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FROG REMAILER Path: nntp1.deja.com!nnrp2.deja.com!nntp2.deja.com!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news-MUC.ecrc.net!remarQ-uK!supernews.com!remarQ.com!rQdQ!news.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Todd Cutter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Remailer abuser caught: Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 02:33:44 GMT Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Lines: 70 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Xnews/Y2K-SE X-No-Archive: yes Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk On 07 Feb 2000 Mon, 07 Feb 2000 20:25:37 GMT, Ch'i wrote: Frog-Admin
[VERY Off-Topic] Heads Up: Databasux is at it again...
Sorry to diverge from the business at hand, but I wanted these archived where they couldn't "disappear"... If anyone is interested, The Burnore criminal (child molesting conviction) file is being scanned in as we speak, and will be available for download by Wed 8 Mar 1500 CST at ftp://archives.mfn.org/CourtDocs/ . Also note that ALL databasix/netbasix/etc for the various X-No-Archive posts of the burnore wrecking crew are now being archived at http://archives.mfn.org . The search engine is rickety, especially being based on an old 233mmx with 64mb, but it "makes do"... We now return you to much more important business :-) Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 23:08:04 -0600 From: Missouri FreeNet Administration <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: alt.fan.gburnore, triangle.general, misc.legal, news.admin.net-abuse.usenet, news.admin.net-abuse.email Subject: Examples of Baseless Complaints From DataBasux Gary - Haven't you figured out yet that *I don't bluff*??? Here's a complaint from Gary to one of my upstream providers (followed by a *really funny* one from Bullinda... Original Message Subject: Posting Social Security Numbers to Usenet in order to harass Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 11:08:35 -0500 From: "Gary L. Burnore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: DataBasix, Raleigh, NC, USA To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Savvis: FYI PRIMARY: Your user Jerry Terranson of MFN.ORG, an ISDN customer, is posting personal information such as Social Security Numbers etc on his Web Site in order to harass. He's your user, your responsibility. See ftp://archives.mfn.org/CourtDocs/* and http://www.archives.mfn.org SuperNews: Your User, Tim Thorne, while not forging, is using my name to post _MY_ _SOCIAL_ _SECURITY_ _NUMBER_ to Usenet. This is NOT acceptable. SuperNews: I am aware that you have, in the past, informed Tim Thorne of our complaints to him. I'll be mailing hard copies of this and other emails to your Corporate Offices. Gary L. Burnore Owner DataBasix On Sun, 05 Mar 2000 15:25:12 GMT, in news.admin.net-abuse.usenet [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary L. Burnore) wrote: >Path: >nntpd.databasix.com!headwall.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!remarQ70!supernews.com!rQ66!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary L. Burnore) >Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet >Subject: Re: Public Posting of Criminal Case >Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 15:25:12 GMT >Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com >Lines: 21 >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ><89r7j2$hff$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <38C1ED74.794B [EMAIL PROTECTED]> <89ssv2$boo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Xref: nntpd.databasix.com news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:24448 > >Belinda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>He didn't spend any time in jail, pre or post sentencing. > >The court documents say different, Belinda. The court documents say he >served two days. Explain that one away, if you can. > >Maybe you can explain what 316-70-3613 is too? > >-- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > How you fuck depends if your step daughter's mom is out. > >Gary L. Burnore | || ||| || ||| || ||| ||| | || >DataBasix| || ||| || ||| || ||| ||| | || >Raleigh, NC | || ||| || ||| ||
Re: Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! (was Re: Re: Re: why worry?)
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Sunder wrote: :Missouri FreeNet Administration wrote: :> :> (J.A. Terranson donned his extra heavy asbestos underwear, then appended :> his thoughts thusly...) :> :> (1) I would argue that there has yet to *be* an actual *Communist* state :> by which we could gauge the Communist existense. : :Erm, what, Russia is not good enough an example for you? No, it is definitely not. the USSR (not "Russia" BTW) was no more a genuine communist state than the US is a genuine capitalist state. :If you agree (and I :don't speak for you) that there is no perfect version of capitalism, but the :USA is the closest, Sorry, I do not agree with this statement. It is mere propaganda. See above. :then would not pre-fall Russia be a perfect example of :Communism/ No. Prefall USSR was an almost perfect example of Fascism. :> (2) I have a *big* problem with Americans not caring what conditions are :> like in the rest of the world: it allows us to continue to both tolerate :> and perpetrate such crimes as we have been committing in Iraq over the :> last 10 years or so. And then of course there are the shenanigans in :> Honduras, Columbia, and let's not forget our dear "friends" the :> Sandinistas... American apathy for all things not *directly* (we don't, :> as a people, seem to understand the concept of indirect events) affecting :> America^h^h^h^h^h^H The "United" States is our greatest (IMNSHO) fault. : :Ok, well, just go and ask the Average Russian(tm) if he gives a rat's ass about :some Average American(tm) bitching about how his beer and his pack of :cigarettes are too expensive these days, or about any other topic. I'd guess :(remember, I don't speak for the Average Russian either) that he'd say "Fuck :you" in so many words. This argument does not address my point. I have just as much of a problem with the average Russian not giving a rats ass about my beer and cigarettes. I'm fatally flawed in that I believe that a thinking creature (and I am convinced that at least *some* humans fall into this category) must use this ability to serve *everybody*. That may well be best done through serving ones self, but this is not the question under consideration here. :> (3) As for the statement (which I choose to take as a "stand alone", e.g., :> not requiring the support of McG's other positions) that most Americans :> are oblivious to the conditions they themselves live in: I believe it is :> true only in the sense that we as a people very much *choose* to *fein* :> this lack of insight. : :Bottom line - it's human nature to not be interested in what doesn't affect you :directly. I disagree: that is animal nature. If man wants to claim the higher ground, s/he will have to play the part. :I honestly couldn't give a rats ass at what went on in Bosnia. If you asked me :what I thought of millions of people getting killed, I'd tell you it's a sad :thing, and I do feel it's sad. But it doesn't affect me. It's not "real" to :me the same way that living my own life is. Knowledge as an outsider and first :hander are different. There is a distinct difference between the concepts of "first hand knowledge" and "not giving a rats ass". That you see them as one in the same is the root of the problem here. :> Interesting side story here(to prove my assertion that these high-wage, :> low physical effort jobs are in fact *forced* on much of the population :> as a sort of opiate): Recently (last 6 weeks or so) I have been making :> the job rounds (boredom has *definitely * set in). Just for the *fun* of :> it, I applied to about a dozen "shitbox" jobs: Jack-in-the-box, MickyD, :> etc. One of them went so far as to "permit" me to take their applicant :> "test" (How many burritos do you need for an order with 2 burritos? ). :> Not a single one of them called me back. I was *serious* about taking :> these jobs: the money was unimportant, but not a single one of these :> places could be convinced of that. On the other hand, when I finally gave :> up and went back to applying for jobs more "in my field ", I managed 4 :> immediate offers (of which only 2 look interesting). : :Interesting experiment... :) It wasn't done as an experiment though: I was legit in wanting that job. I just wanted a change of pace, with something *totally* new and different to learn (how to make 4 million french fries in 1 afternoon *is* a new skill for me ;-). I wouldn't have applied if I wasn't serious. :> No matter how you slice it, we are forced into the peter principle in this :> country. Is this a bad thing? I'm not really sure, although I *am* a :> little bit bitter that I won't g
FYI: Freeh & Co....
-- Forwarded message -- -- 4 March 2000 White House Report Says Anonymity is a Problem According to a forthcoming White House report, the Working Group on Unlawful Conduct on the Internet, created by President Clinton last August, wants law enforcement groups to have greater authority to trace Internet users' identities, and believes Internet service providers (ISPs) should be encouraged to keep track of their customers' on-line activity. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,34659,00.html http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,34720,00.html Editor's Note (Cowan): Most of the evils of anonymity would be eased if strong authentication were pervasive. The problems are caused by forged identity. When Internet users are accustomed to seeing digitally signed traffic most of the time, then they will be able to accord truly anonymous traffic the credibility that it deserves, and people who truly need anonymity for whistle-blowing purposes could have it. -- 3 March 2000 Clinton Asks for Government Internet Security Review President Clinton has ordered Cabinet secretaries and agency heads to take steps to tighten Internet security; his chief of staff will coordinate the review and prepare a report by April 1. http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/cth501.htm http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,34733,00.html http://www.currents.net/newstoday/00/03/06/news8.html -- 29 February 2000 NSA Says Privacy is Not Being Violated The National Security Agency (NSA) sent letters to every member of Congress, assuring them that the Agency is respecting US citizens' privacy. http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2000/0228/web-nsa-02-29-00.asp Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place...
Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! (was Re: Re: Re: why worry?)
(J.A. Terranson donned his extra heavy asbestos underwear, then appended his thoughts thusly...) On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Jim Burnes wrote: :[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :> :> Irrelevent. No one is arguing that existence under communist rule is :> a holiday -- or even better than existence in the U.S. The statement is :> simply that the average american knows dick about the conditions that :> exist in other nations, and as an aside, is oblivious to the conditions :> he himself lives in. : :Well, OK...thats a null statement. Most people have no idea what conditions :are in other nations. Why should they care? (unless they dont like where :they are living and want to move). (1) I would argue that there has yet to *be* an actual *Communist* state by which we could gauge the Communist existense. (2) I have a *big* problem with Americans not caring what conditions are like in the rest of the world: it allows us to continue to both tolerate and perpetrate such crimes as we have been committing in Iraq over the last 10 years or so. And then of course there are the shenanigans in Honduras, Columbia, and let's not forget our dear "friends" the Sandinistas... American apathy for all things not *directly* (we don't, as a people, seem to understand the concept of indirect events) affecting America^h^h^h^h^h^H The "United" States is our greatest (IMNSHO) fault. (3) As for the statement (which I choose to take as a "stand alone", e.g., not requiring the support of McG's other positions) that most Americans are oblivious to the conditions they themselves live in: I believe it is true only in the sense that we as a people very much *choose* to *fein* this lack of insight. I don't really understand the reasoning behind it, but many (I hesitate to say most, although that really is the word which came to mind) of the people I have had "talks" with (where such "talks" required this type of knowledge) seem to be somehow "proud" of this "lack of insight". It's like we- I don't *know* what's it's like: I'm reaching for straws - but it's both very frightening, and sickening at the same time. :> Americans condemn Communism usually without even having read the Communist :> Manifesto; and if they HAVE read the Manifesto, they say something good : :Talk about your broad brushes. I know a lot of Americans who have read :the "Manifesto" long enough to be revolted by it.But Joe Sixpack :also lives by its tenets without realizing that what they are. Reinforcing point (1) above, albeit tangentially. :Many :strictures by which Americans now live were originally tenets of the :US Communist platform including progessive income taxation. Most Americans :are so dependent, so hopelessly inurred with the current lifestyle that :they wouldn't recognize communism if it bit them in the ass. H. "Inurred with the current lifestyle." Very interesting choice of words. "Dependent", also an interesting choice. I submit that both of these statements are rooted in the "lifestyle" of high per capita income to low exertion for these wages. (Yes, I am having a hard time choosing words that don't make me sound, ahhh...,er..., "thick"?). I think that many (if not most to almost all) of these "inurred" and "dependent" people (a position with which I agree BTW) would state categorically and emphatically that they are in fact quite (totally?) *independent*, and that this is *because* of their wages. How many would see the dependency these wages bring? Is there a point to this commentary: not that I can readily identify, other than it "feels necessary" to expound upon it... :> and stupid like "sounds great on paper, but doesn't work in the real :> world." Americans condemn Communism without knowing shit about Marxist :> tenents, and without knowing (or even reading about) the realities of :> life under a Stalinist/Maoist rule. You are sounding a lot like the "average" person you are condemning here... Additionally, again I refer to point 1: Stalinism/Maoism is not necessarily Communism. Rather, they are the conditions which we *associate* with Communism. If you *really * want to look at Communism in a more purified incarnation, maybe you should examine the Oneida communities of New York (which fell apart only in the last 2-3 years of its existence). :Lets be real up front here. Unless you have been out to lunch recently :Communism is an experiment that failed so miserably it exterminated :almost 100 million human beings last century. If that were a disease :we would have government funded programs to wipe it out. Actively :trying to infect people with it would land you in jail. Unfortunately, the "Communism" Jim is referring to here is actually Stalinism, and in many (*not* all - please don't try to impale me on that particular stake :-) ways , the US is travelling down a similar road politically. :I would love to see a Memetic analysis of Communism. I would expect :that it would be substantially similar to th
Re: ??"ss
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Billy Howard wrote: :What is NAMBLA?, and what do they do? Bill North American Man-Boy Love Association. Pedophiles. See "Burnore". Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The Gary Burnore Sexual Assault Ciminal Records artte now ON-LINE: http://archives.mfn.org "I sense some really bad karma here." The Anti-Dork, talking about the MFN X-No-Archive Project http://archives.mfn.org What Goes Around, Comes Around
Re: Could someone please unsubscribe me from this list?
Could someone please unsubscribe me from this list? I've tried so hard to unsubscribe with no luck
FYI: Nov-L: Common sense legislation (fwd)
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 23:01:23 -0800 From: Tom Murlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: November Regional <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, November List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Nov-L: Common sense legislation to unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe november-l" in the body From: CORPUS JUSTICE, INC. P.O. Box 38906, Houston, TX 77238 [EMAIL PROTECTED] web site: http://users.ev1.net/~corpus Citizen Impact Assistance (cia) (713) 867-3934 Contact: Marilyn Head, (281) 405-8998 JUSTICE WATCH - ACTION ALERT LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST & INTEGRITY ACT of l999 [H.R.2656.IH] (Introduced in the House) FOR COMPLETE TEXT: http://thomas.loc.gov/home/c106query.html#keyword Washington D.C., March 15 Law Enforcement Trust and Integrity Act, a bill designed to curb law enforcement and police abuses. The bill was introduced in the House today by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI). At a Capitol Hill press conference, along with many Members of Congress, including Rep. Conyers, Charles Rangel (D-NY), Gregory Meeks (D-NY), Danny Davis (D-IL), Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) and Robert Underwood (D-Guam), civil rights organizations including ADC, NAACP, the ACLU, the Urban League, the National Council of La Raza, and several police organizations voiced support for the bill. The bill provides for: National standards for training, management and oversight of police officers; Mandatory data collection on racial, ethnic and gender profiling in law enforcement; Protections for due process rights of all those accused of abuses; New protections from abuses by the Immigration and Naturalization and Customs Services; Whistleblower protection for officers who break the "blue code of silence" covering abuses; CHECK OUT: ACTION ALERT ACLU TAKE ACTION! Learn more about this bill and send a FREE fax to your Member of Congress, urging them to cosponsor this common sense legislation. Our action alert and letter to Congress can be found on the ACLU website at: http://www.aclu.org/action/police106.html Yesterday, Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) introduced legislation designed to curb outrages like Los Angeles Police Department's "Ramparts" scandal and the Amadou Diallo shooting in New York. "The Law Enforcement Trust and Integrity Act of 2000" represents a comprehensive approach toward creating police accountability and building trust between police departments and their communities. The bill wouldfor the first timebring together community groups, police departments and the Department of Justice to establish national standards for police use of force. The demand for this legislation has been displayed in news coverage from coast to coast. In New York City, Amadou Diallo, an unarmed black man, was killed in the vestibule of his apartment after police shot him 41 times. In Los Angeles, investigations into the city's police department revealed a pattern of arrogance, intimidation and lawlessness. CONTACT CONGRESS MEMBERS web site: Legislative Action Center and Laws http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd/ Issues and Legislation: Law Enforcement Trust & Integrity Act Write Your Representative web site: http://www.house.gov/writerep/ Tom Murlowski E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.november.org Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place...
Re: NOKIA 8860
I need to know how to programming NOKIA 8860. Anyone now how? thanx.
Re: your papers for our sniffer please
The attached reply came from a friend in law enforcement... Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: @.net To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: your papers for our sniffer please (fwd) Don't know how accurate the scanners are for drugs. They need a lot of work for explosives. New Years eve we had "a hit" at the Canadian border. 4 hours later it was determined that the machine hit on the glue in the binding of some books that were in a car. Oct. '98 I was returning from the SOF convention in Vegas, I had been exposed to gun powder and dynamite residue at the "firepower demo" and I didn't wash my clothes. Had I known about the machine, I probably would have washed my clothes. Needless to say, the scanner at McCaren airport picked up nothing! FYI -
Re: micro DNS
Check out "Namespace.com". They are (were?) doing this - with standard DNS tools... On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Anonymous wrote: :Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 16:32 -0700 :From: Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :Subject: micro DNS : :At today's sfbay cpunk meat meet a lot of ranting was centered :on ICANN, TLDs and central naming schemes in general. : :If mass mnemonic use is disregarded for the moment, how about a personal DNS ? : :Each of us manages telephone book in some way. There is no need :for central mapping of telephone numbers to persons. : :I mean *it works*. : :So the same can be done in software. Again, I don't care about the "world" :knowing my httpd server IP number or my smtp IP number. I just care about :the set of people that also know my telephone number. : :So, : :a small *nix, mac & windoze app that is the primary resolver for the local :machine (ie. that one is consulted first), and that either has fixed hosts :file or looks at the given set of name servers. : :This is not any different from existing stuff - it's just another tap :into which alternate name trees can be fed to, at the discretion of the user, :without disturbing the current hierarchy. : :So I can set a small name-like server and me and my friends can install the :said app, and we can have fun having exclusive access to whatever :domain names or TLDs we choose. No spamming. No domain fees. : :Actually, the fact that e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] is visible :only from certain machines can sometimes be very useful. : :Again, the fact that the rest of the world does not know about it is :irrelevant here. This is for the closed group use, like telephone numbers are. : :I would appreciate pointers to similar code if some exists. : : Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place...
Re: micro DNS
Check out "Namespace.com" - they are (were?) doing this, utilizing standard DNS tools On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Anonymous wrote: :Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 16:32 -0700 :From: Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :Subject: micro DNS : :At today's sfbay cpunk meat meet a lot of ranting was centered :on ICANN, TLDs and central naming schemes in general. : :If mass mnemonic use is disregarded for the moment, how about a personal DNS ? : :Each of us manages telephone book in some way. There is no need :for central mapping of telephone numbers to persons. : :I mean *it works*. : :So the same can be done in software. Again, I don't care about the "world" :knowing my httpd server IP number or my smtp IP number. I just care about :the set of people that also know my telephone number. : :So, : :a small *nix, mac & windoze app that is the primary resolver for the local :machine (ie. that one is consulted first), and that either has fixed hosts :file or looks at the given set of name servers. : :This is not any different from existing stuff - it's just another tap :into which alternate name trees can be fed to, at the discretion of the user, :without disturbing the current hierarchy. : :So I can set a small name-like server and me and my friends can install the :said app, and we can have fun having exclusive access to whatever :domain names or TLDs we choose. No spamming. No domain fees. : :Actually, the fact that e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] is visible :only from certain machines can sometimes be very useful. : :Again, the fact that the rest of the world does not know about it is :irrelevant here. This is for the closed group use, like telephone numbers are. : :I would appreciate pointers to similar code if some exists. : : Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place...
Re: Editorial: Liberals Packing Heat (fwd)
To: "Sterling D. Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Greater Things Newsletter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greater Things Christian Newsletter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, SDA Biggies newsletter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, SDA Friends list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David's Outcasts e-group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Editorial: Liberals Packing Heat On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Sterling D. Allan wrote: :SUBJECT: Liberals' Bodyguards Packing Heat :http://www.greaterthings.com/Editorial/liberals_guns.htm : :Editor, : :It just occurred to me that some of the top dog liberals who are for gun :control cart around with them a bodyguard contingent packing more heat than :the police force of a small town. : :If they truly believe in getting rid of guns, why don't they start with the :guns of their body guards? They [obviously] don't believe in "getting rid of guns": they believe in getting rid of OUR guns. :You may say, "But they are important figures whose lives are endangered by :crazy people who might try to kill them!" No, actually. I'd be more inclined to say something like "they are highly visible hypocrites and thieves whose lives are endangered by the rage of those they have screwed (and who rightfully seek revenge)". :Are we not all important in the eyes of God. Why can't the common citizen :also have the right to protect his person? Because then the common person would have the means to protect his *property* as well, and it would be that much harder for "authorities" to act with impunity (illegal taxation; random police stops for "DWB [driving while black]"; heavily armed forcible searches with small armies of hooded "police" who care not if they have the right house, or even the "right" to "search" in this way; "forfeiture laws" which allow the state to take whatever they want, WITHOUT ANY FORM OF DUE PROCESS; etc..) :Isn't this a double standard? You bet your ass it is. :I vote we keep the second amendment in tact. What second amendment? Wake up buddy: it's gone. Along with the rest of them - you want them back? Better get ready to fight for them... H, how are you going to do that *without guns*??? See: this is the most important reason for them to push "gun control" -- so that those few who have woken from the sheeple dream and seen the truth have no physical way to attempt to regain their rights through the only avenue with any real chance of success [armed revolution]. Throughout history, every dictatorship has practiced arms [gun] confiscation and regulation in order to impede reactionary / revolutionary backlashes from their crimes - from Ceasar through Hitler, Stalin, and Clinton. :Sincerely, : :Sterling D. Allan : Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place...
Re: RSA Security releases RSA algoritm into public domain two weeks e arly. [cpunk]
:RSA Security Releases RSA Encryption Algorithm into Public Domain : :'c = m(e) mod n' Made Available Two Weeks Early ROTFLMAO! Gee: wasn't it "public" already? Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place...
Re: Mind altering drugs
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Edward Kuzas wrote: :Can mind altering drugs be given to someone without - that person :knowing? Assuming the molecular structure of the drug in question is sufficiently aligned with the great harmonic convergence, it may be possible to transmit it to an unsuspecting target via electomagnetic waves - for instance, through a Webtv perhaps... Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place...
