Re: DRAFT version of Federal "Justice" Shutdown Project

[Shawn K. Quinn]

On 03/20/2018 12:23 AM, jim bell wrote:
> 'victimless crimes', such as ... illegal re-entry to America

I agree with the other examples you cited, but I would not call illegal
(re-)immigration a victimless crime in all circumstances. I agree our
immigration laws are broken as currently written and enforced; however,
dealing with illegal aliens takes resources away from the rest of us,
especially given that they often do not pay the appropriate amount of
taxes back into the system compared to someone here legally.

-- 
Shawn K. Quinn 
http://www.rantroulette.com
http://www.skqrecordquest.com

DRAFT version of Federal "Justice" Shutdown Project

[jim bell]

Below is a DRAFT 







 BUSINESS PLAN




 Federal “Justice” ShutdownProgram




 By




 Jim Bell




 Vancouver WA USA




 Rev 2.0 

 March 18, 2018
















 TABLE OF CONTENTS



   
   -
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 
   -
COMPANY DESCRIPTION 
 
   -
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
 
   -
MARKETING PLAN
 
   -
OPERATIONAL PLAN
 
   -
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
 
   -
STARTUP EXPENSES AND CAPITALIZATION
 
   -
FINANCIAL PLAN
 
   -
APPENDICES
 
   -
REFINING THE PLAN




















EXECUTIVE SUMMARY




 This is not an ordinary Business Plan,because this will be far from an 
ordinary “business”. There areno ordinary “customers”, nor “suppliers”, nor a 
“market”. Nevertheless, there is a powerful motivation for the public to 
seethis plan attempted, and succeed.




OVERVIEW:




 The purpose of this “business” ispolitical and ideological: It is intended to 
stop the FederalJustice System from prosecuting and convicting the current 
figure ofabout 77,000 defendants per year, 75% of whom are being charged 
with'victimless crimes', such as drugs, money laundering, illegal 
gunpossession, illegal re-entry to America, and drop this number toaround 5,000 
per year. 




 Those 77,000 defendants are convictedwith only about 2,500 trials: This can 
occur only because defendantsare forced to accept plea agreements, by threat of 
much longersentences should they not cooperate. Once the number of 
Defendantsthat the Federal Government can prosecute is dropped to about 
5,000per year, it will be forced to negotiate the end of prosecution 
ofvictimless crimes. 




 Libertarians believe that 'victimlesscrimes' should not be prosecuted. A 
'victimless crime' is one inwhich there isn't an obvious and identifiable 
'victim', a personharmed by the crime. About 75% of the defendants yearly 
prosecutedin the Federal Criminal Justice System are prosecuted for 
'victimlesscrimes': Primarily illegal drugs (“controlled 
substances”),money-laundering, illegal gun possession, and illegal re-entry. 
(Immigration offenses.)




 While some people would say that 'drugcrimes' have victims, the drug users 
themselves, this is in a specialcategory as the 'victims' are almost always 
willing: Theyvoluntarily buy, sell, trade, and use the various drugs involved. 
Further, to a very large extent, harm caused by illegal drugs isactually caused 
by their illegality, not their inherent chemicalcharacteristics. If every 
currently-illegal drug was made, instead,by respected and competent commercial 
pharmaceutical companies, thosedrugs would be very pure and of well-defined 
dosage. “Overdoses”as are currently known would be difficult or impossible to 
have. 




 But in addition to those 75% ofdefendants charged for 'victimless crimes', 
there are many otherpeople of the remaining 25% who probably wouldn't be 
charged with anycrime if, for example, currently-illegal drugs were no 
longerillegal: Theft, robbery, or assault to finance anotherwise-expensive drug 
habit. If, for instance, a person has a$500/day cocaine addiction, that is a 
major problem. If the cost ofthat cocaine was only $5, because it is legal and 
not illegal, hemight still have the medical problems, but he no longer needs 
tocommit the crimes necessary to raise that $500/day. So, potentiallymuch more 
than 75% of the crimes currently prosecuted would no longerexist, or be 
prosecuted.




 If that 75% of victimless crimes wereno longer prosecuted, 75% of about 
77,000, or about 57,750, theFederal system would conceivably be able to shift 
its attention tocrimes that actually do have victims. 










PROBLEMS SOLVED:




 The number of people currently inFederal prison is about 184,000. If over 
time, this were reduced toabout 14,000, that would be a reduction in 170,000 
prisoners. (Forreference, the number of Federal prisoners in 1980 was 
approximately10,000).




 For the taxed public, this shouldresult in a reduction in prison expenses of 
currently(184,000-14,000) = 170,000 prisoners multiplied by $40,000 in costsper 
prisoner per year, or a savings of about $6.8 billion per year,all because the 
Federal prison population will gradually drop. Thiswill also result in the 
extreme reduction of expenses ofinvestigation, prosecution, and conviction of 
about 72,000 personsper year, in an amount approximately $10 billion per year. 
Totalsavings, therefore, will be about $16.8 billion per year. 




 For the defendants' themselves, theelimination of 95% of the Federal criminal 
prosecutions done yearlysolves their problems, obviously. 







GOAL FOR THE BUSINESS:




 We anticipate that well within one (1)year, the number of people prosecuted 
and convicted per year willdrop to approximately 5,000, from the current 77,000 
per year. Therefore, the Federal Government will be hard-pressed to try 
andconvict 1/15th of the current number of defendants. Prisons will have to 
close, because while many prisoners will reachtheir “must 

Re: Jim Bell Interviewed in Anarchapulco

[grarpamp]

Two more from Block Digest...

Fed Justice Shutdown
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qED7-7UbwyQ

AP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us3SEjUi_2E

Jim's ongoing speaking circuit, internet media appearances,
and networking efforts are getting these ideas out to the public.

The combination of cryptocurrency, copyright, legalization,
victimless / paper violation and other communities, into
action models like this for good ends could come soon.
Especially as cryptocurrency adoption takes off
leading to lots of players having some discretionary funds
available to throw at whatever projects interest them.
Even today that's happening.
Just wait till aggregate price stays above $100k,
privacy coin tech, DEX, grocery stores, etc happens.

Re: Adam Kokesh vs Larken Rose: Using Political Process To End Politics?

[g2s]

Anarchast. All White People.
Tells ya sumpthin about libertarians who pose as anarchists.
CrimethInc - What Anarchism Isn't: Libertarianism and Anarcho-Capitalism
https://crimethinc.com/podcast/18/transcript
Rr, a proud member of the EX-Workers collective

null

Re: Jim Bell Interviewed in Anarchapulco

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:40:02AM +, jim bell wrote:
>  On Monday, March 19, 2018, 5:06:39 PM PDT, juan  wrote:
>  
>  
>  On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:56:40 + (UTC)
> jim bell  wrote:
> 
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxwWKQ2pbO0
> 
> 
> >so let's say that people refuse to plead 'guilty' - wouldn't they just 
> >be kept in jail forever, waiting for their turn? Do you have
> >references showing that if the govt can't do a 'speedy trial' it will
> >set their hostages free?
> 
> 
> There is such a thing as the "Speedy Trial Act",  
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedy_Trial_Act 
>
> However, it has as many holes as a piece of Swiss cheese.  However,
> the Feds have a limited capacity to house pre-trial prisoners, a
> limited number of prosecutors, courtrooms, judges, investigators,
> etc.  Currently they are putting on about 77,000 new defendants
> each year, probably convicting 76,000 of them, yet only having
> about 2,500 trials each year.  In other words, about 30 convictions
> for each actual trial.  I am hopeful to drop this to maybe 1.5 to 2
> convictions for each actual trial.  
>
> I don't believe that the Feds will be able to put on more than
> about 5,000 trials, given their limited capacity.  Give virtually
> every defendant a powerful motivation to demand a jury trial, and I
> think the large majority of them will do so.  There would still be
> plea agreements, but they will be on a far better basis, for the
> defendants, than before.  
>            Jim Bell  


Besides getting rid of government and having some sort of stable
utopian anarchy, I think the "gang of 12" or trial by jury, where the
jury has absolute discretion to declare "not guilty" and thereby
implicitly (or explicitly) throw out legislative clauses or entire
acts of parliament, is a practical way forward from where we
currently be.

Greater sovereignty (actual authority) simply -must- be vested in the
people, one way or another.

Thus far, TPTB have made much hay in every civil war, every overthrow
of an existing tyrant, where the (((bankers))) fund all sides of all
wars, by printing their fiat "loans" to unlimited amount, and thereby
they don't care who wins, as long as all sides are beholden to their
fiats.

The fundamental is not compromised government.

The fundamental is who is behind the compromised government, who is
compromising them (in the past with homosexual compromat, nowadays
pedosexual compromat, and otherwise also via murder, and threats of
murder of loved ones).

It is the authority/sovereignty of individuals, and checks and
balances such as the gang of 12, which may be accepted by the
majority in order to effect a non-compromised "revolution into the
hands of the same old powers that be".

Good luck,

Re: Jim Bell Interviewed in Anarchapulco

[jim bell]

 On Monday, March 19, 2018, 5:06:39 PM PDT, juan  wrote:
 
 
 On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:56:40 + (UTC)
jim bell  wrote:

>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxwWKQ2pbO0


>so let's say that people refuse to plead 'guilty' - wouldn't they just 
>be kept in jail forever, waiting for their turn? Do you have
>references showing that if the govt can't do a 'speedy trial' it will
>set their hostages free?


There is such a thing as the "Speedy Trial Act",  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedy_Trial_Act 
However, it has as many holes as a piece of Swiss cheese.  However, the Feds 
have a limited capacity to house pre-trial prisoners, a limited number of 
prosecutors, courtrooms, judges, investigators, etc.  Currently they are 
putting on about 77,000 new defendants each year, probably convicting 76,000 of 
them, yet only having about 2,500 trials each year.  In other words, about 30 
convictions for each actual trial.  I am hopeful to drop this to maybe 1.5 to 2 
convictions for each actual trial.  
I don't believe that the Feds will be able to put on more than about 5,000 
trials, given their limited capacity.  Give virtually every defendant a 
powerful motivation to demand a jury trial, and I think the large majority of 
them will do so.  There would still be plea agreements, but they will be on a 
far better basis, for the defendants, than before.  
           Jim Bell  

Re: Jim Bell Interviewed in Anarchapulco

[juan]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:56:40 + (UTC)
jim bell  wrote:

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxwWKQ2pbO0
> 

 so let's say that people refuse to plead 'guilty' - wouldn't they just 
 be kept in jail forever, waiting for their turn? Do you have
 references showing that if the govt can't do a 'speedy trial' it will
 set their hostages free? 

Re: Adam Kokesh vs Larken Rose: Using Political Process To End Politics?

[juan]

lawl, look at this picture 


https://kokeshforpresident.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/adam-circle-new-300x298.png
http://archive.is/g9i8T

that's 'ex' US military, child murderer kokesh doing the
military salute? Is he out of his fucking mind. 

it's nice to see kokesh being trashed by rose - kokesh is a
 lying fraud. His mental vomit about 'american independence'
 sums him up.

also this is priceless : 

kokesh " we are engineering the libertarian takeover of the
libertarian party" 

see? kokesh is the true libertarian savior...and the
libertarian party isnot libertarian? Wait what? Hasn't
the libertarian party being created by other fucktards
exactly like him, including a bunch of unprincipled
retarded 'anarchist'? 

YES! look at this : 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_Accord

" compromise between the larger minarchist and smaller
anarcho-capitalist factions by adopting a platform that
explicitly did not say whether it was desirable for the state
to exist" 
http://archive.is/g9i8T 

now, the second interesting thing is how *conservative* ron
paul gets his dick sucked, even by rose. 


ron paul is wholly misrepresented by 'anarchist' berwick.
According to berwick paul never voted any 'laws' against the so
called 'non aggression principle'  - which is a fuckingly
stupid lie. 

here's wrong paul  anti-libertarian record on immigration 

http://www.ontheissues.org/tx/Ron_Paul_Immigration.htm

and that's just ONE example of wrong paul anti-libertarian
views. Another one is that it just so happens that  wrong paul
is a STATIST who SUPPORTS TAXATION, also knon as THEFT. And
he's a fucking 'constitutionalist' retard. And so on and so
forth. 
 
last but not least the americunt 'libertarian' 'movement' is a
sorry failure but a very succesful instance of involuntary
self-parody.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_Accord

Jim Bell Interviewed in Anarchapulco

[jim bell]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxwWKQ2pbO0

Re: Adam Kokesh vs Larken Rose: Using Political Process To End Politics?

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:45:28PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> Larken Rose vs Adam Kokesh great debate on Anarchast. Topics include:
> debating the usefulness of using the political system to further the
> cause of Anarchism, democracy is inherently bogus, is any degree of
> statism acceptable, Ron Paul is at least a voluntarist, declaring the
> federal government of no authority, a practical way out of statism,
> people waking up en-mass, does the president have the power to remove
> the post of president, the Libertarian takeover of the libertarian
> party, political authority is fake and illegitimate, principal vs
> pragmatism...
> 
> Larken Rose: http://www.larkenrose.com/
> Adam Kokesh: https://kokeshforpresident.com/
> Anarchast: http://anarchast.com
> 
> Related...
> https://www.youtube.com/user/AMP3083/videos


Thanks!


Good read :)
https://kokeshforpresident.com/platform/

Cryptocurrency: $400M Hotel, Doubling Time, CA

[grarpamp]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcT4-ddkgqc

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/85ikyw/i_made_a_chart_showing_how_long_you_had_to_hodl/
https://imgur.com/ESii2Lj
https://imgur.com/a/1leaI

http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/XRender/en/PowerBrowser/PowerBrowserV2/20180319/-1/28937

Adam Kokesh vs Larken Rose: Using Political Process To End Politics?

[grarpamp]

Larken Rose vs Adam Kokesh great debate on Anarchast. Topics include:
debating the usefulness of using the political system to further the
cause of Anarchism, democracy is inherently bogus, is any degree of
statism acceptable, Ron Paul is at least a voluntarist, declaring the
federal government of no authority, a practical way out of statism,
people waking up en-mass, does the president have the power to remove
the post of president, the Libertarian takeover of the libertarian
party, political authority is fake and illegitimate, principal vs
pragmatism...

Larken Rose: http://www.larkenrose.com/
Adam Kokesh: https://kokeshforpresident.com/
Anarchast: http://anarchast.com

Related...
https://www.youtube.com/user/AMP3083/videos

Being Julian Assange: The Deep State vs The Truth - WikiLeaks

[grarpamp]

https://contraspin.co.nz/beingjulianassange/
https://steemit.com/life/@suzi3d/reading-guide-being-julian-assange
https://twitter.com/hashtag/BeingJulianAssange
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaJNRCeuNR4

Big article covering lots of ground / history,
getting distribution and traction.

Support Julian Assange and WikiLeaks!


Presented by...
https://twitter.com/suzi3d
https://suzi3d.com/

https://twitter.com/KimDotcom
https://www.kim.com/

https://twitter.com/ElizabethleaVos
https://disobedientmedia.com/

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=

https://twitter.com/JulianAssange
https://twitter.com/WikiLeaks

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/julian-assange-the-cia-director-is-waging-war-on-truth-tellers-like-wikileaks/2017/04/25/b8aa5cfc-29c7-11e7-a616-d7c8a68c1a66_story.html

Re: Govt News

[juan]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 01:32:57 -0400
grarpamp  wrote:


> ECCHR’s legal intervention filed with the German Federal Public
> Prosecutor (Generalbundesanwalt – GBA) is aimed at securing an arrest
> warrant for CIA Deputy Director Gina Haspel.

  ha ha ha

  it's nice to see a couple of germans objecting to americunt nazism,
  but the rest of german nazis are nothing but lapdogs of the americunt
  nazis, so

  it's pretty much the same sort of joke as the EFF 'fighting' the
  americunt nazi govt in the americunt nazi government's courts. 

  like calling the cops when the cops are beating you to death. 

  it makes more sense to appeal to the humanitarian feelings of jack
  the ripper than to expect justice from the government's 'justice'
  system. 

Re: US 2018 Election Hijacked: Sybil Candidacies Of The Mil / Intel / Shadow Gov

[Marina Brown]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 03/19/2018 01:05 AM, ilsa wrote:
> I read the entire article and I say this has a chilling sensation
> of a Bruce Willis movie. The 5 eyes now including france against
> germany etc in a return to 19oo' lines! Why are most people eating
> mayonnaise? Smile
> 

Mayonnaise is good with word salad !



> Ilsa Bartlett Institute for Rewiring the System 
> http://ilsabartlett.wordpress.com
>  
> http://www.google.com/profiles/ilsa.bartlett www.hotlux.com/angel
> 
> 
> "Don't ever get so big or important that you can not hear and
> listen to every other person." -John Coltrane
> 
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 3:18 AM, grarpamp  > wrote:
> 
> https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/07/dems-m07.html 
>  
> https://icwatch.wikileaks.org/
> 
> An extraordinary number of former intelligence and military
> operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and
> State Department are seeking nomination as Democratic candidates
> for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. The potential influx of
> military-intelligence personnel into the legislature has no
> precedent in US political history.
> 
> https://t.co/jlLhBHSKqF
> 
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=hNgW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-