On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Razer wrote:
> I'm surprised you haven't been put so deep in an email relay servers
> blackhole yo mama can't find you.
>
> You REALLY send individual copies to eighteen people? Really? Hahahaha!
RFC's clearly specify minimum 100 must be accepted,
that there should be no maximum wherever possible,
and that error responses must be generated.
I'm not getting any error responses.
So no, things are fine on this end and pglaf is broken.
It might not be postfix, but more likely mailman, or whatever
antispam is running there, which is at least this one...
https://amavis.org/
This second message was reordered and cutoff too...
Message-ID:
Also, pglaf is accepting mail from google over TLS,
but pglaf is not sending mail back out over TLS,
at least not to google. Check postfix config,
and old ssl library version.
https://www.openssl.org/source/
Not looked into it but there also seems to be some DKIM / DMARC
issue in the headers. I'd suspect pglaf before google there too.
https://support.google.com/a/answer/174124
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=f+HxqAxu;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of
cypherpunks-boun...@lists.cpunks.org designates 65.50.255.19 as
permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cypherpunks-boun...@lists.cpunks.org;
dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: pglaf.org; dkim=fail reason="verification
failed; unprotected key" header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
header.b=f+HxqAxu; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy);
dkim-atps=neutral
> Hahahaha!
Just spreading sunshine over a bunch of dark clouds out there.
