Re: The friends of jamesd
There's an old joke gos something like: 3 Nigerian women describe their men, one says "I call muh man Ox, he so strong, can lift anything", the next is similar, the third says "I call muh man Drammm-buie!", when the second says "ain't that some fancy kind o liquor/licka?", then the third replies "that's muh man!" Sooo... On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:01:57AM +, professor rat wrote: > I suggested c-punks might tactically ally with Soros... Oh yeah! Thaat's muh anarchist! > Finally a reward of 100$ USD is offered for the correct dox of Batshit crazy. > We can make a horrible example of him. Once again bruh - "thaat's muh anarchist!!" Ooh yeah :D TFW someone really peeves you off and since you cain't argue the argument, you take stephs to -really- add him to you $10 kill list :D Finally we know Mat "Da Rat" Cousco's sovereign song (Juan, take VERY careful note, THIS is what happens when you throw off The Rat's groove!): The\ Emperor's\ New\ Groove\ Opening\ Song\ (Perfect\ World)-uT4ySwoh27Q ~8MiB http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uT4ySwoh27Q "Winner, not loser" ;)
Re: The friends of jamesd
James Dumbfick Don "... Trump's solution, let Jews be Jews and Muslims be Muslims, has been impressively successful in establishing peace in the middle east, or at least peace by middle eastern standards, which is a lot more peaceful than it has been since 1963" Yeah right - they created a desert and called it peace. NO JUSTICE, NO PEACE! "... Comparing the Obama troubles, with the Trump relative peace, it becomes apparent that the problem has always been that America has been attempting to converge everyone to Harvard progressivism, and they did not like it. .." So that's what they were doing in Vietnam and Iraq...you should run for POTUS, Jim. DONALD-TRIG 2024! The REGRESSIVE PARTY!
Re: The friends of jamesd
> James Dumbfuck sez... > > > "...That is a Jew on Jew quarrel, more than it is a Jew on Muslim quarrel. > > Cosmopolitan Jews, the infamous international Jew, don't think Jews > > should have a nation. Muslims don't think anyone except Muslims should > > have a nation. > > > > Why should anyone else care? ..." On 2020-11-29 22:18, professor rat wrote: > Antiwar types should care Trump's solution, let Jews be Jews and Muslims be Muslims, has been impressively successful in establishing peace in the middle east, or at least peace by middle eastern standards, which is a lot more peaceful than it has been since 1963. Comparing the Obama troubles, with the Trump relative peace, it becomes apparent that the problem has always been that America has been attempting to converge everyone to Harvard progressivism, and they did not like it.
Re: The friends of jamesd
> On 11/28/20 20:25, jam...@echeque.com wrote: >> Jews should rule Israel, Christians should rule America, and Hindus >> should rule India, but if Jews don't, that is their problem, not ours. On 2020-11-29 18:47, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > I disagree with all three of these. Religion and government should be > separate, especially in the US where the Constitution specifically says > so. The constitution is not being observed. The Holy Faith of Harvard rules, is converging the Christian Churches, and attempts to converge Muslims in Muslim lands, causing wars. Harvard was founded as the headquarters of the state Church of New England. In the war between the states, it became the state Church of America. The constitution proscribes a federal state Church, but allows the several states to have their several state Churches, an unstable arrangement which predictably failed to survive. State and Church always wind up in each other's arms. If you officially do not have a state religion, you have an unofficial state religion, which is considerably worse.
Re: The friends of jamesd
James Dumbfuck sez... "...That is a Jew on Jew quarrel, more than it is a Jew on Muslim quarrel. Cosmopolitan Jews, the infamous international Jew, don't think Jews should have a nation. Muslims don't think anyone except Muslims should have a nation. Why should anyone else care? ..." Antiwar types should care - even your bum-buddies in Beijing should care if they don't want their belt and road mussed. But none of your Nazbol bum-buddies need care since no one cares about them.
Re: The friends of jamesd
On 2020-11-29 19:17, professor rat wrote: > You think Jews should be allowed to colonize Palestine without peaceful > sanction. That is a Jew on Jew quarrel, more than it is a Jew on Muslim quarrel. Cosmopolitan Jews, the infamous international Jew, don't think Jews should have a nation. Muslims don't think anyone except Muslims should have a nation. Why should anyone else care?
Re: The friends of jamesd
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 09:17:48AM +, professor rat wrote: > Thanks for responding Z. > > "... This is the pragmatic approach which I prefer - and why I oppose BDS, > since the remaining option is ongoing deep entanglement, which appears > counter to our interests. > > There is some wisdom in "light" entanglement ..' > > I see BDS as light entanglement seeking to avoid heavy, but I'm glad you > clarified things there. > > You think Jews should be allowed to colonize Palestine without peaceful > sanction. Good to know. They're a fact on the ground at this point in history .. after 70 years of colonisation. It's a done deal. And I'm takind a pragmatic approach in the interests of my own people. We know your final solution... it's been tried .. allegedly. If you say there ought be no consequences for selfish divided houses .. complain to the Arabs (of all stripes) who utterly failed the prisoner's dilemma, that is to unify, even with Gaddhafi imploring them to. Actions have consequences. Israeli's have made their own collective bed. Now they're possibly successfully tidying their own sheets getting business deals happening with their neighbours. > Shawn responds... > Jews should rule Israel, Christians should rule America, and Hindus > > should rule India, but if Jews don't, that is their problem, not ours. > > I disagree with all three of these. Religion and government should be > separate, especially in the US where the Constitution specifically says > so. In general theocracies are problematic for world peace (which I'd > like to see happen in my lifetime). Of course, some corporations > (military contractors) profit more off of war than peace... > > -- > Shawn K. Quinn > Hear hear. Secularism today, secularism tomorrow, secularism forever. If > there was a God it would be necessary to destroy it. A big part of GARP ( > Global Anarchist Revolution for world Peace ) is establishing " God and the > State ' ( Religion and Nations ) as the revolutionary subject. Later for > capitalism. Corporations can't do much when their Theocratic and/or > nation-state shields are down. Also their corporate billionaire heads will > all be lopped. > > ( Sear Bill Henry Gates at Stiffs dotcom ) > Thanks for your small contribution to CYPHERPUNK 2027!
Re: The friends of jamesd
On 11/28/20 20:25, jam...@echeque.com wrote: > On 2020-11-28 19:41, professor rat wrote: >> ZENDY seems remarkably well informed ( probably lives in the smartest place >> on whatever continent he's domiciled in ) >> But I'm curious what his friends at the Daily Stormer think. Do they all >> agree with you Zenaan? >> >> I've seen some oppose Israel and some support it, for example. >> >> Which camp are you in on that? > > Zeenan should not care. > > Jews should rule Israel, Christians should rule America, and Hindus > should rule India, but if Jews don't, that is their problem, not ours. I disagree with all three of these. Religion and government should be separate, especially in the US where the Constitution specifically says so. In general theocracies are problematic for world peace (which I'd like to see happen in my lifetime). Of course, some corporations (military contractors) profit more off of war than peace... -- Shawn K. Quinn http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com
Re: The friends of jamesd
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:25:59PM +1000, jam...@echeque.com wrote: > On 2020-11-28 19:41, professor rat wrote: > > ZENDY seems remarkably well informed ( probably lives in the smartest place > > on whatever continent he's domiciled in ) > > But I'm curious what his friends at the Daily Stormer think. Do they all > > agree with you Zenaan? > > > > I've seen some oppose Israel and some support it, for example. > > > > Which camp are you in on that? > > Zeenan should not care. > > Jews should rule Israel, Christians should rule America, and Hindus > should rule India, but if Jews don't, that is their problem, not ours. This is the pragmatic approach which I prefer - and why I oppose BDS, since the remaining option is ongoing deep entanglement, which appears counter to our interests. There is some wisdom in "light" entanglement - but deep entanglement compromises both sides interests.
Re: The friends of jamesd
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:07:54PM +1000, jam...@echeque.com wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:52:40AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > >>hmm - it seems trotsky was a murderous jew! just like marx! and lenin! > >> and all the rest of murderous jew scum you admire so much =) > > On 2020-11-28 18:34, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Oh come on.. surely that would be 'revolutionary Jew'... > > This "joo joo joo Roshchilds Rothschilds" crap is part of an internal > fight between internationalist Jews (Karl Marx, Soros, the trots, and > the neocons), nationalist Jews (now mostly located in Israel and led > from Jerusalem), and Orthodox Jews with a religion of exile (persecuted > by Cuomo, among others. > > Non Jews should ignore it. That's a great sentiment and I wish it were "our" optimal approach, and sometimes perhaps it is optimal, bou -some-times the factional wars spill over into a Bolchevik revolution, which can be life ending for many. Perhaps it might behoove us to use smaller words than "behoove" and whilst doing so, attempt to determine whether we might need to pay close attention to that factional war. In any case, siding with justice seems worthy... > The idea that we are helpless puppets of evil Jewish mindrays comes from > those that flatter themselves that they are emitting those mind rays.
Re: The friends of jamesd
On 2020-11-28 19:41, professor rat wrote: > ZENDY seems remarkably well informed ( probably lives in the smartest place > on whatever continent he's domiciled in ) > But I'm curious what his friends at the Daily Stormer think. Do they all > agree with you Zenaan? > > I've seen some oppose Israel and some support it, for example. > > Which camp are you in on that? Zeenan should not care. Jews should rule Israel, Christians should rule America, and Hindus should rule India, but if Jews don't, that is their problem, not ours.
Re: The friends of jamesd
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:52:40AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: >> hmm - it seems trotsky was a murderous jew! just like marx! and lenin! >> and all the rest of murderous jew scum you admire so much =) On 2020-11-28 18:34, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Oh come on.. surely that would be 'revolutionary Jew'... This "joo joo joo Roshchilds Rothschilds" crap is part of an internal fight between internationalist Jews (Karl Marx, Soros, the trots, and the neocons), nationalist Jews (now mostly located in Israel and led from Jerusalem), and Orthodox Jews with a religion of exile (persecuted by Cuomo, among others. Non Jews should ignore it. The idea that we are helpless puppets of evil Jewish mindrays comes from those that flatter themselves that they are emitting those mind rays.
Re: The friends of jamesd
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:52:40AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:31:43 + (UTC) > professor rat wrote: > > > wrkclasshistory > > · > > Nov 27 > > #OtD 26 Nov 1920 the Red Army under the command of Leon Trotsky murdered an > > anarchist delegation > > > hmm - it seems trotsky was a murderous jew! just like marx! and lenin! > and all the rest of murderous jew scum you admire so much =) Oh come on.. surely that would be 'revolutionary Jew'...
