Re: We don't need any ChatGPT

2022-12-06 Thread Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many
This has obviously already been happening in various manners, and
reflects power balances regarding present use of these technologies.

In a normal world, a wiki with AI contribution works great, because
there are more benevolent AI bot devs than malicious ones.


We don't need any ChatGPT

2022-12-06 Thread professor rat
So long as we have Semich, Garofalo and Gramps

 ' . . .  To date, there’s been little evidence of the harmful effects of LLMs 
in the real world. But these recent events at Stack Overflow support the 
argument that the scale of these systems does indeed create new challenges. The 
site’s mods say as much in announcing the ban on ChatGPT, noting that the 
“volume of these [AI-generated] answers (thousands) and the fact that the 
answers often require a detailed read by someone with at least some subject 
matter expertise in order to determine that the answer is actually bad has 
effectively swamped our volunteer-based quality curation infrastructure.”

The worry is that this pattern could be repeated on other platforms, with a 
flood of AI content drowning out the voices of real users with plausible but 
incorrect data. Exactly how this could play out in different domains around the 
web, though, would depend on the exact nature of the platform and its 
moderation capabilities. Whether or not these problems can be mitigated in the 
future using tools like improved spam filters remains to be seen."

https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2022/12/twitter-comes-of-age.html#comments