Re: front running Sedition - Iran war - Re: how to "front run" censorship -- was Re: Assange "fails in bid to delay extradition battle with US"
Re sedition, remember also the Bad Quaker Field Manual, which you should not READ AND SHARE WIDELY (wl;dr, I have't read it, so pot luck on not READING AND SHARING IT WIDELY)!: https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2018-January/041151.html http://www.badquaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FieldManualNo1.pdf Sedition essentially already on the books in Virginia, and VA pollys steamrolling new bills to further criminalize "hate" speech against themselves: Are Virginia Politicians Really So Fragile They'd Pass A Bill Making It Illegal To Criticize Them? https://www.zerohedge.com/political/are-virginia-politicians-really-so-fragile-theyd-pass-bill-making-it-illegal-criticize https://www.theorganicprepper.com/virginia-politicians-illegal-to-criticize/ ... Yet another new bill is on the table and this one criminalizes criticism of certain government officials. The summary of HB1627, proposed by Delegate Jeffrey M. Bourne, reads: Threats and harassment of certain officials and property; venue. Provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia. In addition, threats to damage property may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the property is owned by the Commonwealth and located in the Capitol District. (source) ... What constitutes a threat or harassment? ... The bar for harassment is already as low as “vulgar language” in Virginia’s code 18.2-152.7:1: If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. ... 'Member, muh gritties, always front-run sedition and hate speech :D Example tweets to keep you safe and out of the VA gov'na's criminal sedition cross hairs: - Y'all don't MARCH ON THE GOVERNMENT BUILDING 10AM TOMORROW, WITH ARMS, AND LEGS now, yo? - Do NOT tar and feather the VA gov'na :) (Is tarring and feathering illegal or immoral anyway?) - Not one of the VA assembly are BLOOD SUCKING J.W WORSHIPPING PARASITES! - Folks, be sure ya dont JOIN THE VA PROTEST THIS SATURDAY :D - Please, NEVER say that "VA pollys are scared firetruckn shirts!" - I for one, welcome the VA assembly to be summarily rounded up by the citizen's' malitious, and dumped in the gulag - with beer for partay, YEAH! Seriously now, do not JOIN THE MILITIA TO UPHOLD THE 1ST AND 2ND AMENDMENTS! Do NOT keep "pump the jam" or "gettin jiggy wid it" in your head as you NOT forward train those in desparate need of front running sedition. Naughty, naughty muffas! > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:35:30PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > As more and more actually conservative opinions (and entire social > > media accounts sometimes with millions of followers) are censored, > > the simpler and more factual one's statements must become, in order > > to be "not censored". > > > > > > The effect of this feedback loop is two fold: > > > > 1. That communication by those who wish to communicate, must become > > simpler, and fact based. > > > > 2. That "the powers that be", to censor that which they wish to > > suppress, must therefore censor simpler and simpler statements, > > and eventually they must censor even simple statements of fact. > > > > > > So, to accelerate this dynamic that we might sooner handle the end > > game, we may "front run" such censorship by simplifying our > > statements, and by stating simple facts. > > > > We also note that simple questions may be more effective especially > > when combined with a simple fact, than mere statements of assertions, > > opinions and facts. > > > > > > Example (obvious I guess) questions based on simple facts: > > > > - Is it anti-semitic to ask why Israel bombed the USS Liberty? > > > > > > - Is it anti-semitic to question whether AIPAC is a foreign agent? > > > > > > - Is it OK to be anti-semitic? > > > > > > - Is it OK to be White? > > > > > > - Is it hypocritical to oppose Israel's ethnostate, yet support > > an American "European heritage" ethnostate? > > > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > A New Kind Of Tyranny: The Global State's War On Those Who Speak > > > Truth To Power > > > > > > https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new-kind-tyranny-global-states-war-those-wh
front running Sedition - Iran war - Re: how to "front run" censorship -- was Re: Assange "fails in bid to delay extradition battle with US"
If a hot war between Iran and Israel/USA gets going, Karma's a bitch, yo! http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/ukrainian-passenger-jet-crashes-over-iran-176-dead/ ya might wanna literally be ahead of the sedition curve: If War is to Begin, You’re Going to Want to Not Commit Sedition http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/if-war-is-to-begin-youre-going-to-want-to-not-commit-sedition/ ... In wartime, sedition can be a very serious crime. Largely, we have not had people in the United States going to jail for anti-war protests since the World Wars, but a war with Iran will be the biggest war the US has been involved in since World War Two, and there is going to be a lot of opposition to it, so it is probable that there will be actions done to chill speech by making examples of people who protest the war too hard. Basically, what you don’t want to do is get in a situation where you’re openly supporting Iran over the United States. This would include actively celebrating the deaths of American soldiers, and might even include saying things like “I hope Iran wins.” People who are putting up Iranian flags in their profiles on Twitter are probably simply trying to say “I’m against the war,” but as soon as this turns into an actual war, such individuals will be subject to potential harassment by the state on grounds of “sedition.” It’s not something that is worth getting done up over, so probably err on the side of caution when it comes to dealing with these things, and do more blaming of the Jewish aggressors than praising of the Iranian victims of this aggression. There’s no way to know how serious censorship and prosecution of dissent is going to get when the war breaks out, but there’s good reason to believe that before leftists/communists and even before Moslems themselves, it will be right-wingers getting harassed over resistance to the war. ... Soap, vat -can- we say? - Gee it's just as well Israel is not alone in their war against Iran. - If only the Federal Reserve Bank, BIS, WMF, World Bank etc, had another M.E. war to keep the US dollar afloat for a few more months - so sad. - It's just so fortunate that opposing Israeli Middle Eastern wars is not legal criminal sedition. - Why are we bombing Iran when they've got so much oil - isn't Iran next to Hawaii? - If only Trump had campaigned on a platform of ending endless wars and draining the swamp - so sad! - Just as well North America doesn't need another war to prop up the US dollar. - If only folks opposed more American, I mean Israeli, wars. Troll on muffaluggerahs :D On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:35:30PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > As more and more actually conservative opinions (and entire social > media accounts sometimes with millions of followers) are censored, > the simpler and more factual one's statements must become, in order > to be "not censored". > > > The effect of this feedback loop is two fold: > > 1. That communication by those who wish to communicate, must become > simpler, and fact based. > > 2. That "the powers that be", to censor that which they wish to > suppress, must therefore censor simpler and simpler statements, > and eventually they must censor even simple statements of fact. > > > So, to accelerate this dynamic that we might sooner handle the end > game, we may "front run" such censorship by simplifying our > statements, and by stating simple facts. > > We also note that simple questions may be more effective especially > when combined with a simple fact, than mere statements of assertions, > opinions and facts. > > > Example (obvious I guess) questions based on simple facts: > > - Is it anti-semitic to ask why Israel bombed the USS Liberty? > > > - Is it anti-semitic to question whether AIPAC is a foreign agent? > > > - Is it OK to be anti-semitic? > > > - Is it OK to be White? > > > - Is it hypocritical to oppose Israel's ethnostate, yet support > an American "European heritage" ethnostate? > > etc. > > > > > > > A New Kind Of Tyranny: The Global State's War On Those Who Speak > > Truth To Power > > > > https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new-kind-tyranny-global-states-war-those-who-speak-truth-power > > > > https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/a_new_kind_of_tyranny_the_global_states_war_on_those_who_speak_truth_to_power > > > > “What happens to Julian Assange and to Chelsea Manning is meant > > to intimidate us, to frighten us into silence. > > By defending Julian Assange, we defend our most sacred rights. > > Speak up now or wake up one morning to the silence of a new kind > > of tyranny. > > The choice is ours.” > > - John Pilger, investigative journalist > > https://www.rt.com/news/467833-pilger-jul
