At 11:16 AM 6/16/03 -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: ..
I personally find the privacy implications of EDRs rather unsettling. This story doesn't change that one bit. However, in this particular case, I don't think what the EDR said really matters. The three paragraphs from the story say a lot about what happened here:
..
It seems intuitively like the EDR ought to be about as valuable to the defense as the prosecution, right? E.g., the prosecutor says "this guy was driving 120 miles an hour down the road while being pursued by the police," but the EDR says he'd never topped 70. There are creepy privacy implications in there somewhere, but the basic technology seems no more inherently Orwellian than, say, DNA testing--which seems to be a pretty good way of actually locking up the right guy now and then, rather than someone who looks kind-of like the guy who did it, and was seen in the area by an eyewitness and picked out of a police lineup.
..
Shawn K. Quinn
--John Kelsey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP: FA48 3237 9AD5 30AC EEDD BBC8 2A80 6948 4CAA F259
