On Wednesday, April 25, 2001, at 06:41 AM, Steve Mynott wrote: > Is John Young actually a Nym for Robert Hettinga? > > Or is there meaning hidden via some advanced steganographical > technique? > > John Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> That'd plonk the whole discoursing shebang, I mean lockbox all >> golden tongues everywhere. >> >> Then journalisming kaput, and professorialing, and congressionaling, >> and >> getting inside the barflied nobodies's indifference to yarping of >> yarpingists, >> the tube-hating and baiting of sports, windfall, millionaires. .... Dejoyceizing his scribblings, it all boils down to the Shalmaneserian "Christ, what an imagination I've got!" --Tim May (who can't parse or understand John Young's writings either. When I see he's writing in a lucid state, I read his posts. When I see he's in an opium dream, I delete the fucker.)
- RE: Right to anon. speech online upheld in US district co... John Young
- Teller, Garwin, and H-Bomb Tim May
- Re: Teller, Garwin, and H-Bomb David Honig
- RE: Right to anon. speech online upheld in US distri... Aimee Farr
- Re: Right to anon. speech online upheld in US distri... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Right to anon. speech online upheld in US di... Aimee Farr
- Re: Right to anon. speech online upheld in U... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Right to anon. speech online upheld ... John Young
- Gibberish was Re: Right to anon. sp... Steve Mynott
- RE: Right to anon. speech online upheld in US district co... mmotyka
- Recording conversations and the laws of men Tim May
- RE: Recording conversations and the laws of men Aimee Farr
- Re: Recording conversations and the laws of men David Honig
- RE: Right to anon. speech online upheld in US distri... Aimee Farr
- Trolling Tim May
- RE: Right to anon. speech online upheld in US district co... Aimee Farr