RE: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-13 Thread petro

  Simply fill one of the lower legs of the platfrom with
  mercury, and a little high explosives. Have a panic button in the ops
  center. The SAS lands, and 1000 gallons of pure mercury are blasted
  out into the channel. That wouldn't be nice.

Plays heck with your mercury delay line memory :-)


Also, while pure mercury is bad stuff, it's not as dangerous as
mercury compounds, such as organics or the oxide,
or lots of other stuff.  Similarly, you could store toxic waste,
making your self-defense system a profit-making business...

But if you explicitly dump the waste yourself, not only
are you harming a bunch of non-participants in your fight,
you've got a liability problem that exceeds any profits you may have made.
Ain't worth it.

If the SAS are coming through the front door, you just went bankrupt.

If England, France, Belgium etc. *new* that you would dump a 
massively toxic witches brew into their fishing waters, they might 
make sure that you weren't invaded by guys with guns.

Then again, they just may shoot your off-site personel in 
their sleep, and blockade your platform until you starve.





Re: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-13 Thread David Honig

At 06:34 PM 6/12/00 -0400, David Marshall wrote:
 At the press conference, the government just
tells the truth:

Gimme a break.  The crater was a 'federal day care center',
at least on the first floor...










  








losing laptops, opsec

2000-06-13 Thread David Honig


When you read about losing laptops in Los Alamos (and London), you have
to wonder: why don't those folks encrypt their drives?  They
are somehow thinking physical security is sufficient, and slacking
off otherwise.










  








Re: losing laptops, opsec

2000-06-13 Thread Adam Langley

On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 12:12:01PM -0400, David Honig wrote:
 
 When you read about losing laptops in Los Alamos (and London), you have
 to wonder: why don't those folks encrypt their drives?  They
 are somehow thinking physical security is sufficient, and slacking
 off otherwise.
 

The laptops lost in London (assuming you're talking about the MI5 ones) did
have encrypted drives.

AGL

-- 
There is no grief which time does not lessen and soften.

 PGP signature