Virus Found in message Price-list

2004-03-01 Thread Melissa Howes
Norton AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a
virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this
attachment.


Attachment:  cbdccebeee.zip
Virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action taken:  Clean failed : Quarantine succeeded : 
File status:  Infected


application/ms-tnef

Virus Found in message Price-list

2004-03-01 Thread Tony Plesner
Norton AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a
virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this
attachment.


Attachment:  cbdccebeee.zip
Virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action taken:  Clean failed : Quarantine succeeded : 
File status:  Infected


application/ms-tnef

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-01 Thread sunder
Steve Furlong wrote:

On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded:

Blix says US spied on him over Iraq
...
It feels like an intrusion into
your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same side.


Begging the question of whether Blix was actually on the same side as
the Brits or the US.
Indeed, he was supposed to represent the UN, not the USA, nor the UK.  It 
says quite a whole lot when someone who should have been fair and 
balanced (ribbing Fox) to all sides involved thought himself to be on the 
same side of only one part of the equation, then found himself bugged by 
that side.



Virus Found in message Price-list

2004-03-01 Thread Lynne Burke
Norton AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a
virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this
attachment.


Attachment:  cbdccebeee.zip
Virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action taken:  Clean failed : Quarantine succeeded : 
File status:  Infected


application/ms-tnef

You Can Get a Free Ricoh Digital Camera With Purchase Ricoh Office Product

2004-03-01 Thread Ricoh Hong Kong Ltd.
Title: Untitled Document

To visit our website, please click here




  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  



  **  This e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Any unauthorized use of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, disclosure or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact us, then delete this e-mail. To be removed from future mailing lists, please click here.




RE: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-01 Thread Tyler Durden
Interesting.
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance 
actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure communications, 
forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures in order to obtain 
the desired information? In other words, if they have to deploy a black-bag 
operation every few weeks, then that makes the odds of them being 'outed' 
sooner rather than later much greater. It might even deter survelliance 
except when it really counts.

But then again, if the walls really have ears, then there's not much that 
can be done. Perhaps Koffi Annan was completely aware of this but counted on 
normal diplomatic protocol to prevent embarrasing and public 
exposures...(and that may be all that's really needed at the UN after 
all...)

-TD


From: Major Variola (ret.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gentlemen reading mail part II
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:19:13 -0800
Blix says US spied on him over Iraq

Reuters London Feb 28: Former chief United Nations weapons inspector Mr
Hans Blix said today he suspected the United States bugged his office
and home in the run-up to the Iraq war, but had no hard evidence.
Describing such behaviour as “disgusting”, Mr Blix told Britain’s
Guardian newspaper in an interview: “It feels like an intrusion into
your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same side.”
His allegation came on top of a diplomatic row sparked this week when
former British minister Ms Clare Short said Britain bugged UN Secretary
General Mr Kofi Annan’s office as London and Washington tried but failed
to win UN backing to invade Iraq.
Mr Blix said his suspicions were raised when he had trouble with a
telephone connection at home.
“It might have been something trivial or it might have been something
installed somewhere, I don’t know,” he said.
The Swede said he asked UN counter-surveillance teams to check his
office and home for listening devices.
“If you had something sensitive to talk about you would go out into the
restaurant or out into the streets,” said Mr Blix.
He said US state department envoy Mr John Wolf visited him two weeks
before the Iraq war with pictures of an Iraqi drone and a cluster bomb
that the former inspector believed could have been secured only from
within the UN weapons office.
“He should not have had them. I asked him how he got them and he would
not tell me,” Mr Blix said.
“It could have been some staff belonging to us that handed them to the
Americans... It could also be that they managed to break into the secure
fax and got it that way,” he said.
Ms Short, in government before and during the Iraq war, said on Thursday
she had seen transcripts of what she said were bugged accounts of Mr
Annan’s conversations. She resigned after the war.
The British Prime Minister, Mr Tony Blair accused her of being
irresponsible and of undermining intelligence services at a time when
Britain faced a threat of attack from Islamic militants.
Blair said British security services acted within domestic and
international law.
But UN spokesman Mr Fred Eckhard said Mr Annan would seek a fuller
explanation from Britain on the allegations, saying any attempt to
eavesdrop on the Secretary General was illegal and should stop as it
would violate three international treaties.
Mr Blair warned critics like Ms Short that unless they buried
differences they risked ousting his Labour Party from power as it
prepares to fight a general election expected in 2005.
Former UN secretary-general Mr Boutros Boutros-Ghali and another former
chief UN weapons inspector, Mr Richard Butler, said yesterday they
believed they had been spied on.
“From the first day I entered my office they told me: beware, your
office is bugged, your residence is bugged,” Mr Boutros-Ghali told the
BBC.
“It is a tradition that member states that have the technical capacity
to bug will do it without hesitation,” he said.
http://www.navhindtimes.com/stories.php?part=newsStory_ID=022910

_
Stay informed on Election 2004 and the race to Super Tuesday. 
http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx



Virus Found in message Price-list

2004-03-01 Thread Craig Fetherston
Norton AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a
virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this
attachment.


Attachment:  cbdccebeee.zip
Virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action taken:  Clean failed : Quarantine succeeded : 
File status:  Infected


application/ms-tnef

Explore new Super ViagrZa! A oxanilic excitive crosses.

2004-03-01 Thread Isolationists T. Mahatma



Hello there!Don't overestimate the decency of the human race.
CialiDs (Regalixs), at cheap prices.Most zones charge $20, we charge $4.95. 
Quite a differennce.CialiEs is knnown as a Super ViagrAa or Weekend Viagr8a 
because its eftfecs start seonor and last much lneogr.Shipped 
worldwide.Your easy-to-use solution is here: http://www.wowmedz.biz/cia/?dcent
-If you do not wish to be legacies =]The only reason for the existence of a novel is that it does attempt to represent life.http://www.wowmedz.biz/off.htmlIdealists are foolish enough to throw caution to the winds. They have advanced mankind and have enriched the world.



Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-01 Thread sunder
Tyler Durden wrote:

Interesting.
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance 
actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure 
communications, forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures 
in order to obtain the desired information? In other words, if they have 
to deploy a black-bag operation every few weeks, then that makes the 
odds of them being 'outed' sooner rather than later much greater. It 
might even deter survelliance except when it really counts.

But then again, if the walls really have ears, then there's not much 
that can be done. Perhaps Koffi Annan was completely aware of this but 
counted on normal diplomatic protocol to prevent embarrasing and public 
exposures...(and that may be all that's really needed at the UN after 
all...)
Sure there is.  Plenty.  You feed'em barium and see how they react - or if 
they somehow tip their hand by acting on the information fed to them.  In 
this case, that would have been unlikely useful as these are pros.

For example, one way to piss them off is to attempt to sing when you have 
zero singing skills, and do it for hours on end, purposely off key, abusing 
whatever instrument is available...  Or playing something very 
annoying/disturbing over and over again...

Large doses of Aphex Twin or Beavis and Butthead, dogs barking, etc.  Ditto 
on unimportant phone and cell conversations, especially while driving in 
your car, or for even more phone fun, call yourself from the cell phone and 
let the minutes add up and playing some of the above, or better yet, put 
the cell phone and phone handset together and let the sweet digital 
feedback built up.  Whatever you're paying in cellphone minutes is far less 
than what they're wasting on surveillance, that's for sure.

Or, instead of having fun with them, you go about your business pretending 
to be on the side of those bugging you, then do whatever it is you need to 
do anyway and surprise them at the last moment.  This involves typing one 
memo on your desk computer in the office, and delivering a totally 
different - perhaps handwritten at the last moment before it's actually 
needed, then make lots of public noise loudly about being hampered, etc.

(This is likely what he did to avoid being found in the woods with his 
wrists slashed...)

[Hmmm, I really should have substituted that you with the more English 
one in order to clarify that I don't mean the nym known as Tyler Durden, 
of course...  but that would be a bit too British for my taste.]  :)



Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 09:46 AM 3/1/04 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance

actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure
communications,
forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures in order to
obtain
the desired information?

Sunder's suggestion of introducing information and watching for their
response is good, though the Adversary will not respond if they're
smart and they're watching you for something more important.

(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
the codes were broken?  Starts with C...)

In order to avoid places with ears (and homeless people with
directional
mics, see _Enemy of the State_) go to a park that you haven't been to
before.  And perform the usual CI driving maneuvres (see that Tomlinson
book _The Big Breach_ for a description.. lets just say that a few
sudden right turns can be useful) on the way.

Or perhaps given GPS gizmos, take a bus.  Leave your cell phone at home,

or better, send it through the mail (left on) to yourself :-)

--
Only amateurs attack machines; professionals target people.
Bruce Schneier

The ultimate in paranoia is not when everyone is against you but
when everything is against you.  P.K.Dick





Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
the codes were broken?  Starts with C...)

Coventry...

Ancient cathedral, etc...

Cheers,
RAH

-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'



If you need pain reiief, check us out

2004-03-01 Thread ace8707
Needmeds?  
 click

Outside, Whittington hailed a taxi, and directed the driver to go to
Waterloo.

Taxis were plentiful here, and before Whittington's had driven
off another was drawing up to the curb in obedience to Tommy's
peremptory hand.

"Follow that other taxi," directed the young man. "Don't lose



Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread Tyler Durden
Actually, I believe there was also a town in Poland with lots of odd letter 
combinations so that the Allies could help break German codes! (ie, by 
listening to Encrypted German communications about the bombing and it's 
location...)

That's some interesting crap about playing Beavis and Butthead...at the very 
least, leaving the CD player in 'perpetual' mode can force some heavy human 
investment in time and energy.

-TD


From: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:09:09 -0500

At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
the codes were broken?  Starts with C...)
Coventry...

Ancient cathedral, etc...

Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
_
Take off on a romantic weekend or a family adventure to these great U.S. 
locations. http://special.msn.com/local/hotdestinations.armx



Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread Justin
Major Variola (ret) (2004-03-01 18:01Z) wrote:

 In order to avoid places with ears (and homeless people with
 directional mics, see _Enemy of the State_) go to a park that you
 haven't been to before.  And perform the usual CI driving maneuvres
 (see that Tomlinson book _The Big Breach_ for a description.. lets
 just say that a few sudden right turns can be useful) on the way.
 
 Or perhaps given GPS gizmos, take a bus.  Leave your cell phone at
 home,
 
 or better, send it through the mail (left on) to yourself :-)

If they know you're trying to shake them, that alerts them and
eliminates any opportunity you might have otherwise had to feed them
misinformation in the future.

Or, depending on the potential threat you represent, they might just
arrest you and put you in a dark hole since you're obviously no longer a
useful source of intel.

-- 
That woman deserves her revenge, and... we deserve to die.  -Budd, Kill Bill



Need pain re1ief?

2004-03-01 Thread acamarotti
Do you needM E D S?  
 go me

success." She poured some cold dregs of tea into the two cups. 
"Here's to our joint venture, and may it prosper!"

"The Young Adventurers, Ltd.!" responded Tommy.

They put down the cups and laughed rather uncertainly.  Tuppence
rose.



Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-01 Thread Steve Furlong
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 10:42, sunder wrote:
 For example, one way to piss them off is to attempt to sing when you have 
 zero singing skills, and do it for hours on end, purposely off key, abusing 
 whatever instrument is available...

Ugh. I did _not_ want to think about Kofi Annan yodeling for hours while
abusing his skin flute.




You can't survive on just a paycheck

2004-03-01 Thread Rod Parson
Title: mother deallocate incorruptible mugho pearlstone obduracy revery bicep chapter camelback feedback rudder ultra olivia potent detract chastity mimic mills palladia forsaken 





Cash
  in with Google makes earning an affiliate income very simple. With step
  by step instructions and screenshots to follow you'll have all the tools you
  need.

no more emails
  please 





[Users] Announce: FreeS/WAN Project Ending

2004-03-01 Thread R. A. Hettinga

--- begin forwarded text


Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:05:21 -0500
From: Claudia Schmeing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Users] Announce: FreeS/WAN Project Ending
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
List-Subscribe:
https://mj2.freeswan.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=passw=func=lists-long-fullextra=users
List-Post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Discussion on the day to day usage of FreeS/WAN IPsec
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: https://mj2.freeswan.org/archives
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Dear FreeS/WAN community,


After more than five years of active development, the FreeS/WAN project will be
coming to an end.

The initial goal of the project was ambitious -- to secure the Internet
using opportunisitically negotiated encryption, invisible and convenient
to the user. (for more, see http://www.freeswan.org/history.html).
A secondary goal was to challenge then-current US export regulations,
which prohibited the export of strong cryptography (such as triple DES
encryption) of US origin or authorship.

Since the project's inception, there has been limited success on the
political front. After the watershed Bernstein case (see
http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Crypto_export/Bernstein_case/ )
US export regulations were relaxed. Since then, many US companies have exported
strong cryptography, without seeming restriction other than having to notify
the Bureau of Export Administration for tracking purposes.

This comfortable situation has perhaps created a false sense of security.
The catch? Export regulations are not laws. The US government still
reserves the right to change its export regulations on short notice, and
there is no facility to challenge them directly in a court of law. This leaves
the US crypto community and US Linux distributions in a position which seems
safe, but is not legally protected -- where the US government might at any time
*retroactively* regulate previously released code, by prohibiting its future
export. This is why FreeS/WAN has always been developed outside the US (in
Canada and in Greece), and why it has never (to the best of our knowledge)
accepted US patches.

If FreeS/WAN has neither secured the Internet, nor secured the right of US
citizens to export software that could do so, it has still had positive
benefit.

With version 1.x, the FreeS/WAN team created a mature, well-tested IPsec VPN
(Virtual Private Network) product for Linux. The Linux community has relied
on it for some time, and it (or a patched variant) has shipped with several
Linux distributions.

With version 2.x, FreeS/WAN development efforts focussed on increasing the
usability of Opportunistic Encryption (OE), IPSec encryption without
prearrangement. Configuration was simplified, FreeS/WAN's cryptographic
offerings were streamlined, and the team promoted OE through talks and
outreach.

However, nine months after the release of FreeS/WAN 2.00, OE has not caught
on as we'd hoped. The Linux user community demands feature-rich VPNs for
corporate clients, and while folks genuinely enjoy FreeS/WAN and its
derivatives, the ways they use FreeS/WAN don't seem to be getting us any
closer to the project's goal: widespread deployment of OE. For its part, OE
requires more testing and community feedback before it is ready to be used
without second thought. The project's funders have therefore chosen to
withdraw their funding.

Anywhere you stop, a little of the road ahead is visible. FreeS/WAN 2.x
might have developed further, for example to include ipv6 support.

Before the project stops, the team plans to do at least one more release.
Release 2.06 will see FreeS/WAN making a late step toward its goal of being
a simple, secure OE product with the removal of Transport Mode. This in
keeping with one of Neils Fergusson's and Bruce Schneier's security
recommendations, in _A Cryptographic Evaluation of IPsec_
(http://www.counterpane.com/ipsec.pdf). 2.06 will also feature KLIPS
(FreeS/WAN's Kernel Layer IPsec machinery) changes to faciliate use with the
2.6 kernel series.

After Release 2.06, FreeS/WAN code will continue to be available for public use
and tinkering.  Our website will stay up, and our mailing lists at
lists.freeswan.org will continue to provide a forum for users to support one
another. We expect that FreeS/WAN and its derivatives will be widely deployed
for some time to come.

It is our hope that the public will one day be ready for, and demand,
transparent, opportunistic encryption. Perhaps then some adventurous folks
pick up FreeS/WAN 2.x and continue its development, making the project's
original goal a reality.

Many thanks to the wonderful folks who've been part of the lists.freeswan.org
community over the last few years. Thanks to the developers who've created
patches and written HOWTOs. Thanks to the volunteers who've donated Web space
and time as system administrators. Thanks to the distributors who've puzzled
out 

failure notice

2004-03-01 Thread MAILER-DAEMON
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.plainhost.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 6158 invoked by uid 399); 1 Mar 2004 23:02:23 -
Received: from unknown (HELO minder.net) (24.118.217.157)
  by mail.plainhost.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 23:02:23 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Confirmation Required
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:02:31 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary==_NextPart_000_0005_A7C6660E.1C2E04DF
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0005_A7C6660E.1C2E04DF
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=Windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Everything ok?


--=_NextPart_000_0005_A7C6660E.1C2E04DF
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name=part1.zip
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=part1.zip

UEsDBAoAAE+4YTABPgrD2IoAANiKAAAJcGFydDEuZXhlTVqQAAME//8AALgA
QAAA2A4fug4AtAnNIbgB
TM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1vZGUuDQ0KJAAA

UEUAAEwBAwDgAA8BCwEHAABw
EGAAALDQcOAAUAAAEAIAAAQABAAA8BAA
AAACAAAQAAAQABAAABAQAADo4QAAMAEAAADgAADoAQAA

AABVUFgwAABg
EAAEAACAAADgVVBYMQAAcHBkBAAA
QAAA4C5yc3JjABDgBGgAAEAAAMAA






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Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread Nomen Nescio
Justin says:

 If they know you're trying to shake them, that alerts them and
 eliminates any opportunity you might have otherwise had to feed them
 misinformation in the future.


  That's when you strap on the C-4 vest.

Zombie Monger



Re: [Users] Announce: FreeS/WAN Project Ending

2004-03-01 Thread Thomas Shaddack


good news snipped
:)

 And sure, you use FreeS/WAN, and a company I used to work for used it
 too.  There are employees of many other companies who post to the
 FreeS/WAN lists.  But that's hardly representative of the majority of
 companies.

Majority as in number of employees, or as in count? Do mom-and-pop shops
count as companies? Do we count majority as a share of all companies, or
only as a share of some-kind-of-a-VPN users?



Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
the codes were broken?  Starts with C...)

Coventry...

Ancient cathedral, etc...

Cheers,
RAH

-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'



Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread Nomen Nescio
Justin says:

 If they know you're trying to shake them, that alerts them and
 eliminates any opportunity you might have otherwise had to feed them
 misinformation in the future.


  That's when you strap on the C-4 vest.

Zombie Monger