latimes.com Member Login Help Request

[loginhelp]

This mail is being sent to you because a request was made at our website to re-send 
the member name and/or password for this account.

Member Name = cpunks 

Password =  cpunks 

You can change your password and your other account information at any time by going 
to: http://www.latimes.com/services/site/registration/ 

If copying and pasting, please copy and paste the entire link into your browser.  AOL 
users may need to take extra special care to do this. 

Thank you for choosing latimes.com as one of your resources for news and information. 

Sincerely, 

Los Angeles Times Web Site

Ehva You can bvy V~i_c_o`din 0n1ine here

[jere emanuelson]

ndkn  neronize  olpidium  oooi  ljt

Take charge of your m,edical conditions now. 0rder on^line. Live a
healthier and happier life - all from the comfort of your home! Quality Meds
we offer: 

0~rder Vi_c0.din 0nline Anytime

Fedex delivery.

U B http://mlb.net.bn7nb.com/?p=8089  78

Bvy 0n.line in the comfort of your home.

G'ive up:  http://qyuh.p.vbfcrt.com/e.html

In some Government offices the clerks, upon arrival in the morning, have to
sign their names in an "attendance book". This book provides space for
signature, time of arrival, and "remarks." Ten minutes after the hour and
official draws a red line under the last arrival's name, and all those
coming subsequently are expected to furnish an explanation of their
tardiness in the "remarks" column.When a real "London particular" occurs the
number "below the line" is legion; the first of them writes: "Delayed by
fog," and the rest scribble a "ditto".One morning -- a foggy one -- Mr.
Jones became a proud father; but even this only caused him to be about
eleven minutes late. Proudly he wrote in explanation: "Wife had twins,"
which was followed in due course by the usual string of "ditto's".
A woman has twins, and gives them up for adoption. One of them goes to a
family in Egypt, and is named "Amal." The other goes to a family in Spain;
they name him "Juan."Years later, Juan sends a picture of himself to his
mom. Upon receiving the picture, she tells her husband that she wishes she
also had a picture of Amal. Her husband responds, "But they are twins--if
you've seen Juan, you've seen Amal."
seibunpo3unuma06sonei,kushutu totuzeni. 

Ixtheq Med Z0ne

[carson trotti]

obnn  nuclin  jliukkon  mhpp  lgoldingckibo

You too can now enjoy the same deep di~scou.nts offered to US residents by
o-rdering your prescriptions directly from us. Highest quality d-rugs we
offer: ) 

Vic~0-din ES 90 Tab Special.

delivered withing 24 hours

A B http://ytrj.net.bn7nb.com/?p=8089

Bvy 0n-line in the comfort of your home.

D^rop me:  http://ien.wg.vbfcrt.com/g.html

It was a very foggy day in London. The fog was so thick that it was
impossible to see more than a foot or so. buses, cars and taxis were not
able to run and were standing by the side of the road. People were trying to
find their way about on foot but were losing their way in the fog. Mr. Smith
had a very important meeting at the House of Commons and had to get there
but no one could take him. He tried to walk there but found he was quite
lost. Suddenly he bumped into a stranger. The stranger asked if he could
help him. Mr. Smith said he wanted to get to the Houses of Parliament. The
stranger told him he would take him there. Mr. Smith thanked him and they
started to walk there. The fog was getting thicker every minute but the
stranger had no difficulty in finding the way. He went along one street,
turned down another, crossed a square and at last after about half an hour's
walk they arrived at the Houses of Parliament. Mr. Smith couldn't understand
how the stranger found his way. "It is wonderful," he said. "how do you find
the way in the fog?""It is no trouble at all to me," said the stranger: " I
am blind."
Before traveling to London on business, an American drove his Rolls Royce
to a bank in the middle of New York to ask for a loan of $5000. He left his
rolls-Royce as collateral. The loan officer accepted and had the car driven
down into the the bank's underground car park for safekeeping. He then
handed the businessman $5000.Two weeks later, the American came back from
London and he went to the bank to return his loan and bring back his car.
"That will be $5000 plus $15.40 in interest," said the loan officer. The man
wrote a cheque and started to walk away."Wait a minute, sir" said the bank
man. "While you were away, I discovered that you are a millionaire. Why in
the world do you need to borrow $5000?"The man smiled. "Where else in New
York could I park my Rolls-Royce for two weeks for only $15.40?" 
konpatom3totsugis06tukubash,sinkabuw nijuuich. 

Security Alert: Sasser virus outbreak, update your protection.

[Virus Shield from OSG]

workforce

[Jamar Franco]

http://surfactant.nbvwet67.com/ti/#bake

off
http://bubble.nbvwet67.com/b.html#gas

Carter
 


2314980695842336420--

ADV: Deals On Mackinac Island Memories from Michigan.org

[chicagotribune.com advertiser message]

Title: Mackinac Island




  
  
  
  
  	As a registered member of www.chicagotribune.com and/or www.ChicagoSports.com, you will receive occasional email announcements from our company on behalf of our advertisers. You will have to unregister from our service if you do not wish to receive such announcements. To safeguard your privacy, we have not provided your e-mail address or any other personal information to this advertiser. Please read our privacy policy for more details.
 
 
  
  
  
  
   
 
  
   
 
 
  
   
 
  
   
 
  
   
 
  
  
  

  
  
  
  
  	
  		
  			
  To contact Travel Michigan by mail, write to 300 North Washington Square, 2nd Floor, Lansing, MI 48913. If you do not wish to receive solicitations sent by Travel Michigan, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
  			
  		
  	
  
  
  
  
  

  
  	
 About this communication:
 		
You have received this communication because you are a registered member of www.chicagotribune.com and/or www.ChicagoSports.com, located at Customer Relationship, 777 W. Chicago Avenue, FC300, Chicago, IL 60610. It was sent by www.chicagotribune.com and/or www.ChicagoSports.com on behalf of an advertiser and is part of our effort to incorporate advertising that allows us to bring you our award-winning editorial content at no charge. Your personal information was not shared with the advertiser and we limit the amount of such advertising you will receive. For more information on how we protect your information, please read our privacy policy.
If you do not wish to receive solicitations sent by www.chicagotribune.com and/or www.ChicagoSports.com on behalf of third parties, you will have to unregister from our service. Please note that only registered users may use our entire site. For more information on how to unregister, please click here.
  
  

Re: [FoRK] Why We Are Losing The War on Terrorism

[Major Variola (ret)]

>"The volume of data they collect has reached the point where good
>analysis is no longer tractable in a theoretical algorithmic sense with

>the best tools they currently have at their disposal, particularly when

>you have a data space as broad and diffuse as "terrorism" to sift. "

This is a sham.  Their traffic analysis tools are very competent.
And pervasive.

They are perhaps jockeying for money for translators, since that
may be the limiting resources.  That may be what keeps the
signal to noise down so that further resources can be applied.
Tracking and correlating are not the bottlenecks.

Buy V.icodin Online For Less

[Mary M. Pacheco]

Buy your drug of choice, NO prescription required
Today's special: Free overnight Fedex delivery
Vicodin.$2.58/dose
Hydrocodone$2.11/dose
Xanax...$2.57/dose
Valium..$2.67/dose
Phentermine..$0.88/dose
Stock is limited and selling fast, so hurry
Buy them here

TSA to Test New Rail Security Technology

[R. A. Hettinga]

Newsday.com

TSA to Test New Rail Security Technology

 By LESLIE MILLER
 Associated Press Writer

 May 4, 2004, 9:36 AM EDT

 WASHINGTON --  Amtrak and commuter rail passengers at one suburban station
will have to walk through an explosives detection machine and have their
bags screened in a new security experiment designed to frustrate terrorists.

The Transportation Security Administration was beginning a pilot project
Tuesday at a rail stop in a Maryland suburb of Washington. Passengers were
to walk through a "puffer" machine, which sucks in the air around them and
within seconds determines whether they've been in contact with explosives.

Jack Riley, director of the public safety research program for Rand Corp.,
a think tank, said harried commuters probably won't like being screened.

"Anything that lengthens their rail experience is just going to meet with
resistance," he said.

TSA spokeswoman Yolanda Clark said the agency hopes passengers will see it
"as another ring of security in another mode of transportation."

The 30-day pilot program also includes a baggage screening machine used in
overseas airports. The TSA wants to see how well the machines work in a
passenger rail and commuter environment.

Amtrak and a commuter railroad service use the station in New Carrollton,
Md., about 9 miles northeast of Washington.

The TSA announced the project in March, soon after terrorist bombings on
trains in Madrid killed 191 people and injured more than 2,000. The FBI and
the Homeland Security Department have warned that terrorists might strike
trains and buses in major U.S. cities using bombs concealed in bags or
luggage.

Since more than half of Amtrak's 500 stations are unstaffed, screening all
passengers is nearly impossible.

TSA spokesman Mark Hatfield said of the experiment, "We're looking to get a
lot of data that's going to help us look at ways it can be deployed and
eliminate ways that it won't be practical."

A key problem in screening railway passengers is doing it quickly enough
that trains still run on time. That is not supposed to be a problem with
the puffer machine, made by General Electric.

The machine -- formally called EntryScan -- already is used in power plants
and military installations in the United States and Europe.

GE spokesman James Bergen said every person constantly radiates as much
heat as a 100-watt light bulb in a "human convection plume." The puffer
machine has a hood that catches the optimal amount of plume, he said.

If someone has a bomb or has been in contact with one, the plume will carry
traces of explosives into a detector that measures the wavelength of the
energy coming off the particles.

Some passengers also will be asked to put their bags through a machine that
uses X-ray technology to determine what's in them. The machine, made by L-3
Communications of New York City, is used in overseas airports, as well as
at the Statue of Liberty and in government buildings on Capitol Hill.

The Rand Corp.'s Riley said he doubts the equipment will be practical on a
day-to-day basis. Screening rail passengers might make sense for certain
events, he said, such as the upcoming political conventions.

Only passengers on Amtrak and the Maryland Transit Administration's MARC
commuter rail system will be affected. A Washington Metro train also stops
at the New Carrollton station, but those passengers won't be part of the
study.

* __

On the Net:

Transportation Security Administration: http://www.tsa.gov

Transportation Department: http://www.dot.gov


-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga 
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

Re: [FoRK] Why We Are Losing The War on Terrorism (fwd from andrew@ceruleansystems.com)

[Tyler Durden]

"The volume of data they collect has reached the point where good
analysis is no longer tractable in a theoretical algorithmic sense with
the best tools they currently have at their disposal, particularly when
you have a data space as broad and diffuse as "terrorism" to sift. "
This is also going to get increasingly difficult in the US, as the entire 
world begins to view us as a rogue nation. In other words, within a few 
years a search of potential terrorists is likely to spit out 95% of the 
world's population! (Unless, of course, we can convince everyone that 
torture is a necessary tool for freedom.)

-TD

From: Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FoRK] Why We Are Losing The War on Terrorism (fwd from 
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 10:56:42 +0200

- Forwarded message from "J. Andrew Rogers" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

From: J.Andrew Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 22:08:30 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FoRK] Why We Are Losing The War on Terrorism
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613)
On May 3, 2004, at 9:14 AM, Contempt for Meatheads forwarded:
>We desperately need adult supervision and high quality minds in the
>intelligence business!  I am growing more convince that the security
>clearance process, the government hiring/promotion process, and
>information silos are overwhelming our ability to get even a
>marginally adequate level of intelligence needed to fight terrorism. 
>Wow, this is depressing.
>
>My confident belief (100%):  we will continue to lose the war on
>terrorism until we fix our intelligence system.
I think this analysis is correct, but also a bit too shallow to be
really insightful.  While there are some significant institutional
problems and byzantine self-defeating regulations, these things are
masking a much bigger technical problem that desperately needs to be
tackled from their perspective.
The volume of data they collect has reached the point where good
analysis is no longer tractable in a theoretical algorithmic sense with
the best tools they currently have at their disposal, particularly when
you have a data space as broad and diffuse as "terrorism" to sift.
Institutional procedures and problems aggravate this, but the
underlying issues are deeper.
One of the ways I keep track of what the US DoD is up to is by analysis
of the open research programs, contracts, and grants that they publish.
 By threading the many, many programs together over time, you can see
how fast different technologies are progressing and you can chain
inferences to make an intelligent estimate as to when specific
capabilities (which may require the intersection of multiple research
tracks) could theoretically be available to the DoD.  Furthermore, the
program managers have a habit of mildly editorializing their program
descriptions in response to some of the proposals they have received
and the success of the proposals they have actually funded, which also
gives some added insight.
One thing that I have noticed for several years is that the advanced
data mining and automated intelligence analysis research programs have
been essentially stalled for many years now despite aggressive
marketing and a large number of agencies willing to liberally fund
proposals.  And the editorializing of the program managers on this
research track makes it clear that they are quite frustrated both with
the lack of progress in this area and with the fact that research
proposals keep trying to beat the same dead horse over and over.
Furthermore, while most programs have a shelf-life after which they are
either closed (both on good progress or no progress), these particular
programs keep getting extended and re-funded over and over, sometimes
under a different name but always with roughly the same parameters.
As long as this program track is stuck in neutral, the intelligence
agencies will have serious problems that will be all but
insurmountable.  The US intelligence service is a victim of its own
ability to acquire data.  This isn't a problem that they can simply
throw money at in the sense that it requires pretty substantial
algorithm breakthroughs to even be tractable for high-quality analysis.
 To date, private research organizations have clearly been unable to
solve this problem in any meaningful way, and there is substantial
evidence of this fact.  In the mean time, they are left using narrow
brittle algorithms to sift and analyze the data, with holes you could
drive a truck (bomb) through.
Someone who fully understood the theoretical limitations and likely
implementation parameters of the current state-of-the-art could likely
defeat the automated analysis.  Fortunately for the intelligence
agencies, few people have those skills and they get by on a pretty
broken system hampered further by institutional problems.
j. andrew rogers
___
FoRK mailing list
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
-

Getting Carded

[R. A. Hettinga]

The Wall Street Journal

  May 4, 2004

 REVIEW & OUTLOOK


Getting Carded
May 4, 2004

The Scottish historian and philosopher David Hume once wrote that "it is
seldom that any liberty is lost all at once." British Home Secretary David
Blunkett seems to have taken Hume's lesson to heart with his slow-motion
effort to introduce mandatory identity cards in the U.K.

Last week, the U.K. began issuing national ID cards with biometric
information. The pilot program will issue 10,000 ID cards. But this plan is
scheduled to expand. By 2007 cards will be distributed "voluntarily" when
renewing a passport; those not interested in a biometric card will be free
to surrender their passports. Before the Parliament votes in 2012 or 2013
on whether to give everyone over 16 years of age a card and require people
to carry them at all times, 80% of the population will have been issued a
card.

That's why now is the time for a serious debate over the merits of national
ID cards that will include a retinal scan, fingerprints or measurements of
the exact dimensions of the face in addition to the usual name, address,
and passport number. The cards might make life harder on illegal
immigrants, but it's hard to see how they would protect British subjects or
anyone else from terrorists.

Mr. Blunkett has managed to muddy the water by introducing the cards
incrementally and by fueling a stir over whether royals would carry them.
He is quoted in the media describing the level of fine for failing to
update an address, (£1,000), or failing to carry a card when (and if) the
program becomes mandatory (£2,500).

A Home Office that argues that such a program would protect against
identity theft, benefits fraud and illegal immigration has sought to
capitalize on fears and anxieties prompted by terrorist attacks to build
support for the program.

But all this distracts from the basic debate of whether the net benefit of
universal biometric ID cards is worth the cost in terms of civil liberties,
privacy and freedom. That debate has nothing to do with recent Home Office
hype.

It's important to acknowledge what a national ID program would and would
not do. Such a program undoubtedly would make life more difficult for
economic refugees and other immigrants.

That is not to say that immigrants would cease to flee unlivable economic
and political situations because of an added layer of regulation, but such
persons would be driven into an underground economy to an even greater
extent than currently. If Mr. Blunkett wants to debate immigration policy,
he should do so. Hiding xenophobic policies behind the terror threat, from
which many look to the government for protection, is disingenuous.

ID cards might also reduce some social security fraud. But British
taxpayers shouldn't see the cards as saving money. ID cards could prevent
an estimated 5% of the £2 billion of social-security fraud each year. But
once you've paid for the cards themselves (just over £3 billion according
to Mr. Blunkett's estimate) and bought 4,500 card readers, it's hard to see
a huge net gain. There are better, cheaper and less invasive methods of
curbing fraud.

Most importantly, ID cards would not protect against terrorists. To argue
that a small plastic card would present an obstacle to a suicidal
fundamentalist terrorist is preposterous.

Mr. Blunkett has danced just shy of this argument, saying, of course it
wouldn't prevent terror, and in the same breath arguing that it would help
terror enforcement. In the introduction to the bill, he's written "the
threat of global terrorism . . . make[s] secure identification more vital
than ever."

But better protection against false identities wouldn't have prevented the
9/11 attacks, where individuals -- most with clean records and bona fide
papers -- entered the U.S., in some cases years before the attacks. Unlike
economic migrants, terrorists have the wherewithal to get their papers in
order.

Al Qaeda terrorists are far too sophisticated to get tripped up by a
regulation requiring IDs. The attempt to harness the anxiety from the
Madrid bombings and channel it to provide momentum for his bill is
intellectually dishonest. Mr. Blunkett at least owes an undisguised debate
about ID cards.


-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga 
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

Gener|c Vi@akgr@ vitally drown

[At04732]

Bellovin pacer highwayman whaling beribboned
cemented juggling Moonlike expense vagina
Epicurizes mettle candied hearing clause
Steen humidity fitting Gandhi Naomi
manuals houses rasher Fulton roams

Remember: Generic V'l'a'r'kg'a just st|mulates eerct|on

stationary fastenings entrenches Weissman Kingsley
modeled eager autonomy nested Molotov
Glenn hooks Scala nucleic caveats
artfully rumpled partakes percent Okamoto
motorcar reverified Madrid bifurcate contract

doitrightnow.net/gv/chair.php <--- t0 be 0p t-0ut

cheeriness ethics Atchison Aramco marble
laughed pitying variables infinity reactivity
retrieving woodland occupant paperwork shams
evaluator valuable meaning deficit shades
flights Peugeot submit tumor begrudged
dissects membership troops ethic sphinx

Re: Incoming Message

[Shamrock]

 





Nervous_illnesses.cpl
Description: Binary data

Hydrocodone V.icodin ES Generic Lortab Generic V.icodin

[Grace E. Nguyen]

Buy your drug of choice, NO prescription required
Today's special: Free overnight Fedex delivery
Vicodin.$2.54/dose
Hydrocodone$2.17/dose
Xanax...$2.59/dose
Valium..$2.69/dose
Phentermine..$0.84/dose
Stock is limited and selling fast, so hurry
Buy them here

hi

[passover]

Hi name is Jenny, a friend said you were really cool and said I should get in contact you with you! I love meeting new people, I also love to talk and show off my body. I just got my videocam working so you can see me to! It doesn't cost you anything if you wanna watch or talk to me! You don't even need your own videocam! To contact me you need to go to my website, (dont worry it doesnt cost a dime!) but it is the only way you can contact me! 

Just Goto the Website below to get in touch with me!

www.hijenny.com/jenny.html

I hope I get to see you soon ;-)-Jenny


hzxmzcvfcntprpyguzvcxsnhnh
qftoleltbocvtawuywuorrferqs
aiyuxetipfnxclflapar
gpzewfviajkbwqxudiqoik
mvakmqathylaytalodjcwmlaakbrc
jkuctdesnqfecstidgkak
kemrxzoaczwuxhlywoscctn
eslvwchvoqwudokyuikbc
klcohxvmholdidgcngpgviu
qxmgkahcuztrwxftqhkpcpithzvxz
hcglgpzsuhdovhvjdmumnngsecrqfo
poeujlggzzauwiipuvnoczmqhni
lfguonwizscmigdocmfeyr
peltdabsqsevsujydnmxfvedky
2

Re: [FoRK] Why We Are Losing The War on Terrorism (fwd from andrew@ceruleansystems.com)

[Eugen Leitl]

- Forwarded message from "J. Andrew Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

From: J.Andrew Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 22:08:30 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FoRK] Why We Are Losing The War on Terrorism 
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613)


On May 3, 2004, at 9:14 AM, Contempt for Meatheads forwarded:
>We desperately need adult supervision and high quality minds in the 
>intelligence business!  I am growing more convince that the security 
>clearance process, the government hiring/promotion process, and 
>information silos are overwhelming our ability to get even a 
>marginally adequate level of intelligence needed to fight terrorism.  
>Wow, this is depressing.
>
>My confident belief (100%):  we will continue to lose the war on 
>terrorism until we fix our intelligence system.


I think this analysis is correct, but also a bit too shallow to be 
really insightful.  While there are some significant institutional 
problems and byzantine self-defeating regulations, these things are 
masking a much bigger technical problem that desperately needs to be 
tackled from their perspective.

The volume of data they collect has reached the point where good 
analysis is no longer tractable in a theoretical algorithmic sense with 
the best tools they currently have at their disposal, particularly when 
you have a data space as broad and diffuse as "terrorism" to sift.  
Institutional procedures and problems aggravate this, but the 
underlying issues are deeper.

One of the ways I keep track of what the US DoD is up to is by analysis 
of the open research programs, contracts, and grants that they publish. 
 By threading the many, many programs together over time, you can see 
how fast different technologies are progressing and you can chain 
inferences to make an intelligent estimate as to when specific 
capabilities (which may require the intersection of multiple research 
tracks) could theoretically be available to the DoD.  Furthermore, the 
program managers have a habit of mildly editorializing their program 
descriptions in response to some of the proposals they have received 
and the success of the proposals they have actually funded, which also 
gives some added insight.

One thing that I have noticed for several years is that the advanced 
data mining and automated intelligence analysis research programs have 
been essentially stalled for many years now despite aggressive 
marketing and a large number of agencies willing to liberally fund 
proposals.  And the editorializing of the program managers on this 
research track makes it clear that they are quite frustrated both with 
the lack of progress in this area and with the fact that research 
proposals keep trying to beat the same dead horse over and over.  
Furthermore, while most programs have a shelf-life after which they are 
either closed (both on good progress or no progress), these particular 
programs keep getting extended and re-funded over and over, sometimes 
under a different name but always with roughly the same parameters.

As long as this program track is stuck in neutral, the intelligence 
agencies will have serious problems that will be all but 
insurmountable.  The US intelligence service is a victim of its own 
ability to acquire data.  This isn't a problem that they can simply 
throw money at in the sense that it requires pretty substantial 
algorithm breakthroughs to even be tractable for high-quality analysis. 
 To date, private research organizations have clearly been unable to 
solve this problem in any meaningful way, and there is substantial 
evidence of this fact.  In the mean time, they are left using narrow 
brittle algorithms to sift and analyze the data, with holes you could 
drive a truck (bomb) through.

Someone who fully understood the theoretical limitations and likely 
implementation parameters of the current state-of-the-art could likely 
defeat the automated analysis.  Fortunately for the intelligence 
agencies, few people have those skills and they get by on a pretty 
broken system hampered further by institutional problems.

j. andrew rogers

___
FoRK mailing list
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork

- End forwarded message -
-- 
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
__
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net


pgp8atYwWSg1n.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Iqliuv here is the Rx informati0n you re.quested

[stephen anastas]

buhner  closeconnection  unido-as  


0`n|ine Pharm & Overnight Shipping!

Pain Management Resources:V:ico-din 

We accept almost every form of payment. 

Q S http://popsmtp.WHENEVERWHEREVERAPPS.INFO/wdj/


Quit:  http://popsmtp.WHENEVERWHEREVERAPPS.INFO/aps/rm.html
A very beautiful girl walked up to a department store's fabric counter  and
said, "How much is this?""Only a kiss a meter," replied the smirking man
assistant."That's fine." replied the girl. "I'll take for meters." The
assistant quickly measured the material, wrapped it and then gave it to the
girl. Taking it, the girl turned and pointed to an old man standing beside 
her. "MY grandpa will pay the bill." she said.
Fred was applying for a job as a flagman/switch operator on the railroad.
The chief engineer was conducting the interview. "What would you do if the
Northern Express was heading north on Track 1 and the Southern Central was
heading south on Track 1?" Fred quickly answered, "Well, I'd call my
brother." The chief engineer just sat there for a second. "Why would you
call your brother ?" "He's never seen a train wreck before." 
shoutuki2shippou26onkai,tanpa mo-ningu. 

chiton

[Spencer Woody]

http://ellipse.nbvwet67.com/ti/#spec

off
http://inflammable.nbvwet67.com/b.html#ponce

Sherrie
 


1574684671466341--