Re: Gubmint Tests Passport RFID...
Gee whiz I'm scared. Look, since you're angling for some stats, come on over to New York. I'll meet you on the corner of 135th Street and St Nicholas Avenue (we call that neighborhood Harlem). Look for me: 6'1, 220 lbs and looking EXACTLY like someone would look after 7 years of GoJu training...I'm the guy even the locals won't fuck with. -Tyler Durden From: Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Gubmint Tests Passport RFID... Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:20:54 -0400 (EDT) --- Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whaddya know. Thompson said something that didn't make me want to beat him to death... Too bad for you that I cannot say the same about what you write. I have a different threat model. I've reached more or less the same conclusion. Or at least, incompetence may not be deliberate per se, but the byproduct of a system that needs to appear to care but is otherwise silently incented not to. Checking bags in the NYC transit system is the ultimate example of this: Completely, absolutely pointless in the face of a determined foe. (Meanwhile, of course, there's all sorts of state shennanegins that are possible through such an arrangement.) No fucking shit. Thanks for pointing this out to me. The obvious question is how much 9/11/01 is an example of this. For me, the conspiracy theories just don't quite add up (close though) but a moderately sharpened Occam's razor leads one to believe that some 'deliberate' holes were left open, which bin Laden, et al exploited. (I actually still believe that Bush didn't expect that level of damage, however.) I don't know Bush, personally, and so I feel that it would be improper to suggest that his unspoken cost-benefit analysis resulted in a particular set of actions. As for the integrity of the money supply, I must succumb to temptation and question whether the Stalinst model of a demand economy (servicing an endless war on terror) hasn't been looked at by folks such as Wolfowitz, Cheney and so on. Suckkumb all you want. Regards, Steve __ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
BANNED FILENAME (.exe) IN MAIL FROM YOU
BANNED CONTENTS ALERT Our content checker found banned name: .exe in email presumably from you (cypherpunks@minder.net), to the following recipient: - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery of the email was stopped! The message has been blocked because it contains a component (as a MIME part or nested within) with declared name or MIME type or contents type violating our access policy. To transfer contents that may be considered risky or unwanted by site policies, or simply too large for mailing, please consider publishing your content on the web, and only sending an URL of the document to the recipient. Depending on the recipient and sender site policies, with a little effort it might still be possible to send any contents (including viruses) using one of the following methods: - encrypted using pgp, gpg or other encryption methods; - wrapped in a password-protected or scrambled container or archive (e.g.: zip -e, arj -g, arc g, rar -p, or other methods) Note that if the contents is not intended to be secret, the encryption key or password may be included in the same message for recipient's convenience. We are sorry for inconvenience if the contents was not malicious. The purpose of these restrictions is to cut the most common propagation methods used by viruses and other malware. These often exploit automatic mechanisms and security holes in certain mail readers (Microsoft mail readers and browsers are a common and easy target). By requiring an explicit and decisive action from the recipient to decode mail, the dangers of automatic malware propagation is largely reduced. For your reference, here are headers from your email: - BEGIN HEADERS - Return-Path: cypherpunks@minder.net Received: from minder.net (host217-35-96-228.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.35.96.228]) by gilmore.ael.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3016173465 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:47:07 +0200 (CEST) From: cypherpunks@minder.net To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Returned mail: Data format error Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:45:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0007_51A8B051.CCE73B11 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- END HEADERS -- Reporting-MTA: dns; gilmore.ael.be Received-From-MTA: smtp; gilmore.ael.be ([127.0.0.1]) Arrival-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:47:15 +0200 (CEST) Final-Recipient: rfc822; nicolas.pettiaux@gmail.com Action: failed Status: 5.7.1 Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 Message content rejected, id=05345-05 - BANNED: .exe Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:47:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from minder.net (host217-35-96-228.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.35.96.228]) by gilmore.ael.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3016173465 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:47:07 +0200 (CEST) From: cypherpunks@minder.net To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Returned mail: Data format error Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:45:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0007_51A8B051.CCE73B11 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are You Having Bad Teeth? Z5N9j
The revolution Whitelight teeth whitening which guarantees: - Fast Results and easy to use - works great against all sorts of stains (coffee, smoking) - Boost your confidence with great white smile - Used by dentist and millions worldwide - Satisfaction Guarantees...NO Risk! Why waiting? Check us out! http://iglobalproducts.net/wlr KevV
Re: Gubmint Tests Passport RFID...
Gee whiz I'm scared. Look, since you're angling for some stats, come on over to New York. I'll meet you on the corner of 135th Street and St Nicholas Avenue (we call that neighborhood Harlem). Look for me: 6'1, 220 lbs and looking EXACTLY like someone would look after 7 years of GoJu training...I'm the guy even the locals won't fuck with. -Tyler Durden From: Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Gubmint Tests Passport RFID... Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:20:54 -0400 (EDT) --- Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whaddya know. Thompson said something that didn't make me want to beat him to death... Too bad for you that I cannot say the same about what you write. I have a different threat model. I've reached more or less the same conclusion. Or at least, incompetence may not be deliberate per se, but the byproduct of a system that needs to appear to care but is otherwise silently incented not to. Checking bags in the NYC transit system is the ultimate example of this: Completely, absolutely pointless in the face of a determined foe. (Meanwhile, of course, there's all sorts of state shennanegins that are possible through such an arrangement.) No fucking shit. Thanks for pointing this out to me. The obvious question is how much 9/11/01 is an example of this. For me, the conspiracy theories just don't quite add up (close though) but a moderately sharpened Occam's razor leads one to believe that some 'deliberate' holes were left open, which bin Laden, et al exploited. (I actually still believe that Bush didn't expect that level of damage, however.) I don't know Bush, personally, and so I feel that it would be improper to suggest that his unspoken cost-benefit analysis resulted in a particular set of actions. As for the integrity of the money supply, I must succumb to temptation and question whether the Stalinst model of a demand economy (servicing an endless war on terror) hasn't been looked at by folks such as Wolfowitz, Cheney and so on. Suckkumb all you want. Regards, Steve __ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
