Re: no anon conversations?

[David Crookes]

An Metet wrote:
What technologies currently exist for receiving a/psuedononymous message?
With Mixmaster, sending mail, posting news, and even blog posting are
possible, However, receiving replies securely or, better, holding a private
conversation is difficult or impossible. Best bet seems is to encrypt and
spam somewhere very public? Ugly, ugly. No technological method, just a few
"trust me" remailers. Other options?
Mixminion offers a basic building block called SURBs, Single User Reply 
Blocks.

http://mixminion.net/
http://mixminion.net/minion-spec.txt
There is a draft spec. for a nymserver which uses this building block 
but I've seen no news of an ongoing implementation:

http://mixminion.net/nym-spec.txt
Mixminion installation still indicates that anonymity is still not 
available, due to traffic levels still being too low. The mailing list 
discussed current traffic levels recently:

http://archives.seul.org/mixminion/dev/Apr-2004/msg1.html

Re: Fwd: Re: The Neocon Case for Imprisoning War Opponents

[David Crookes]

On Wednesday 03 March 2004 02:54, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:17:31 -0600
> Subject: Re: The Neocon Case for Imprisoning War Opponents
> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:17:27 -0800
> From: Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Heh. Missing Tim are we?

Re: Sunny Guantanamo (Re: Speaking of the Geneva convention)

[David Crookes]

On Friday 19 December 2003 20:35, James A. Donald wrote:

>
> In fact Glaspie told Saddam that if he invaded Kuwait, the shit
> would hit the fan.
>
> (That was not her words.  Her words were "subject of concern",
>

Cite? The google groups article you linked to has two links to possible 
transcripts. Neither back up your claim.

Re: Drunken US Troops Kill Rare Tiger

[David Crookes]

On Monday 22 September 2003 12:37 pm, Sarad AV wrote:
>
> Vote for some one who promises freedom,democracy 

These two don't co-exist too well if you're idle.