Re: Say goodbye to the ISS

2003-02-03 Thread Malcolm Carlock
> I was shocked to learn Saturday that NASA had not a mechanism to
adequately
> inspect the exterior of the shuttles for damage before the return to
> earth.  The reasons given seem to imply that NASA's ability for EVAs was
> very limited and did not generally include on most flight the possibility
> of such examinations.  Further there was no effective ground or ISS-based
> observation method either.

Weird.  I recall when the shuttles first began flying, reading about how the
bottom of at least some the ships (certainly the first) were being examined
for damage remotely, by telescope from the ground.  Further, I distinctly
recall reading an article that described, and I believe had one or more
photos of, a tile repair kit for use in space.  What happened to all of
these things, I wonder?

I must admit it also seems very strange that the shuttle couldn't have been
examined while docked to the ISS.

By coincidence, a tube train in London (where I live) jumped the track last
week and tore up a station, when one of its traction motors dropped onto the
rails.  Thanks to that, the major east-west tube line has been out of
service for days, causing travel chaos.  Apparent failure thanks to deferred
maintenance, by way of ill-advised cost cuts -- twice in one week,
seemingly.




Re: One of our gunships is missing (Was: Grand Theft Panzer)

2002-05-06 Thread Malcolm Carlock


>How many 'Screen Names' does BT Internet give you per account, Malcolm?

Wait a minute... are you saying that a 'screen name' is not the same as an
anonymyzer?

Good Lord!




Re: Got carried away...

2002-05-02 Thread Malcolm Carlock

Steve Furlong wrote:
>US tanks don't have built-in locks as in private autos. They have heavy
>wire loops or bars and are locked with ordinary (if rather heavy-duty)
>padlocks.

Speaking of securing military vehicles... I understand that most US fighter
jets are not equipped with self-starters.  This differs from, say, Sweden
and Finland, where fighters have self-starters, to facilitate quick takeoffs
from backwoods roads.

If the US were ever invaded, surely such independent operational ability
would be a good thing.

Perhaps the US has a greater fear of such vehicles going walkabout?