Re: CDR: Re: aljazeera.net hacked again?
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote: This really is infowar, and I suspect the US government is the hacker. I entirely forgot about another, already-existing, infrastructure: P2P networks! Freenet, Gnutella, Kazaa, WinMX, lots and lots of napsteroids. Get the files - images, webpages, whatever you have, package them into suitably-sized files (if the size is too big, split the files to Basic and [...] Yeah, Cool, etc. But, who cares? Aljazra, at least, people tend to believe. (not saying folks shouldn't. Just think.) Orbit-by-shootings aren't really that interesting. Way too much to falsify. Any other images? any Photoshop-pro can handle that. So... what are you showing me and mine? Yes, I think distribution on Freenet and other tools are a good idea. But who cares? This isn't rhetorical. -j -- Jamie Lawrence[EMAIL PROTECTED] The sign that points to Boston doesn't have to go there. - Max Scheler
Re: CDR: Re: aljazeera.net hacked again?
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote: This really is infowar, and I suspect the US government is the hacker. I entirely forgot about another, already-existing, infrastructure: P2P networks! Freenet, Gnutella, Kazaa, WinMX, lots and lots of napsteroids. Get the files - images, webpages, whatever you have, package them into suitably-sized files (if the size is too big, split the files to Basic and [...] Yeah, Cool, etc. But, who cares? Aljazra, at least, people tend to believe. (not saying folks shouldn't. Just think.) Orbit-by-shootings aren't really that interesting. Way too much to falsify. Any other images? any Photoshop-pro can handle that. So... what are you showing me and mine? Yes, I think distribution on Freenet and other tools are a good idea. But who cares? This isn't rhetorical. -j -- Jamie Lawrence[EMAIL PROTECTED] The sign that points to Boston doesn't have to go there. - Max Scheler
