Honeypot.
Child sex offenders nabbed after girl sets up Website August 1 2002 Four men have pleaded guilty to child sex offences after a 15-year-old Victorian schoolgirl set up a website with explicit photos of herself. The Melbourne Magistrates Court today was told the men, all in their 20s, allegedly met the girl in internet chatrooms from where she gave them links to her site which carried sexually explicit language and photos of herself. After viewing the site and reading the girl's text, the men arranged to have sex with her throughout 1999. The girl had initially set up the site with schoolfriends using another Internet website which allows people to build their own homepage. The four men all waived their right to a pre-trial committal hearing in court today and entered guilty pleas to charges of sexual penetration of a child aged between 10 and 16. advertisement One of the men, Geoffrey Townsend, 27, of Pakenham, also faces a separate charge of causing a child to take part in prostitution after he paid the girl for sex. In some of the schoolgirl's chatroom meetings, it was allegedly suggested that she could make money from the Internet liaisons. Troy Hill, 26, of Boronia, pleaded guilty to 17 counts of sexual penetration of a child and one count of making child pornography. Rick Gryzb, 24, of Bentleigh, and Aaron Hirt, 28, of Cranbourne, each pleaded guilty to three child sex charges. Police were tipped off by welfare workers who had been contacted by teachers when word of the website spread. Police subsequently closed the site. The four men will face a plea hearing in the County Court on October 15. A fifth man, Kent Matthews, 23, of Wheelers Hill, is facing five charges, including sexual penetration of child between 10 and 16. He will face a committal hearing in the Melbourne Magistrates Court on October 10. No evidence linking professor rat as a 22 yo to the 5 time fornication in one day with a 15 yo has been alleged.Thank Fuck.
Slashdot | OpenBSD 3.0 Honeypot Whitepaper
http://bsd.slashdot.org/bsd/02/07/13/0346209.shtml?tid=172 -- -- When I die, I would like to be born again as me. Hugh Hefner [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ssz.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.open-forge.org
HONEYPOT
Is Jimbo a honeypot? He posts off topic about bombs and anti gov crap. he collects the Taylors.Bells,and Totos then narks them. He seems to want to piss off every one on this list. Standing back from the list do I see the right picture? n the name of Allah the most Gracious the most Merciful Get Your Free Email at www.ajeeb.com
MPAA honeypot (Re: MPAA thinks linking is illegal [cpunk]
[I'm seeing a *large* number of messages yesterday and today which apparently have sat on some spool for around 2 weeks. In some cases, responses to these messages got through rapidly, but the original did not.] > -- > David Honig[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes: > At 04:09 PM 8/30/00 -0400, Greg Newby wrote: > >I was forced to remove my copy of the DeCSS code this spring by UNC as > >a result of a complaint by the MPAA. > > First, You have the right to contest any copyright infringement they > allege to your ISP (UNC in this case). Second, linking isn't copyright > infringement. > [...] > or confuse them: > > Post DeCSS under a different file name, possibly changing the .zip > to avoid recognition by filesize. Include enough text on your page > to help the search engines. (will the next MPAA target be search > engines, which will be prohibited from indexing DeCSS?) [...] Last weekend, someone spammed the DeCSS code to all or most of the the comp.* usenet newsgroups. Deja has already removed all of the original posts, but not messages which quote the original - for example, the post noting this as a spam event contains the entire source, and is still up. [It's possible that the posting had an x-no-archive header, but I doubt it] Peter
MPAA honeypot (Re: MPAA thinks linking is illegal
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 04:33:04PM -0400, David Honig wrote:
>
> At 04:09 PM 8/30/00 -0400, Greg Newby wrote:
> >I was forced to remove my copy of the DeCSS code this spring by UNC as
> >a result of a complaint by the MPAA.
> >
> >Now, the MPAA is trying to force me to remove a LINK to the code from
> >my class page. This is enough to make me want to throw up.
>
> First, You have the right to contest any copyright infringement they
> allege to your ISP (UNC in this case). Second, linking isn't copyright
> infringement.
Rights, shmrights. The deal I got from UNC last time was to take down
the code, or they would take it down or block network access to the
machine. (It was on a departmental server.)
No negotiation ("read my lips.")
(Tangent: In February/March I sent inquiries to several well-known
ISPs and dedicated hosting services, including co-location services.
None answered my question as to whether they would host my class
pages, given the MPAA's complaint. So much for the free market.)
> Post/Link to files named DeCSS but not containing the code they're
> concerned with.
Doesn't matter if the real link is in thereI could lie, but the
MPAA seems to have lots of time/money to devote to reading people's
links.
> or confuse them:
>
> Post DeCSS under a different file name, possibly changing the .zip
> to avoid recognition by filesize. Include enough text on your page
> to help the search engines. (will the next MPAA target be search
> engines, which will be prohibited from indexing DeCSS?)
What I'll be doing is posting the code via dox or another similar
tool that renders it into winnow+chaff or plain speech.
> Of course your UNC sysops will not be amused, unless they are
> sympathetic, and you may need to terminate your UNC-based crusade
> to keep from annoying them excessively, or spending too much of your time
> explaining the law (and its abusers) to the university legal staff. There
> are plenty of other hosting sites, and universities are soft targets.
The thing is, universities *should* be hard targets. Under the 11th,
suing a state (UNC, remember?) can be hard... and the state has
conceivably as much money as the MPAA (i.e., an infinite amount).
Plus, universities should be standing up for this type of thing.
But UNC will probably roll over, again, on top of me (no vaseline,
sorry).
-- Greg
MPAA honeypot (Re: MPAA thinks linking is illegal
At 04:09 PM 8/30/00 -0400, Greg Newby wrote: >I was forced to remove my copy of the DeCSS code this spring by UNC as >a result of a complaint by the MPAA. > >Now, the MPAA is trying to force me to remove a LINK to the code from >my class page. This is enough to make me want to throw up. > First, You have the right to contest any copyright infringement they allege to your ISP (UNC in this case). Second, linking isn't copyright infringement. Type the link out in english, with instructions on copying and pasting into the location-bar of a browser. or distract them: Post/Link to files named DeCSS but not containing the code they're concerned with. or confuse them: Post DeCSS under a different file name, possibly changing the .zip to avoid recognition by filesize. Include enough text on your page to help the search engines. (will the next MPAA target be search engines, which will be prohibited from indexing DeCSS?) Of course your UNC sysops will not be amused, unless they are sympathetic, and you may need to terminate your UNC-based crusade to keep from annoying them excessively, or spending too much of your time explaining the law (and its abusers) to the university legal staff. There are plenty of other hosting sites, and universities are soft targets. ..in fact, it is widely grokked that cats have the hacker nature --Jargon File 4.2.2
