Re: Future Gnu's

2002-01-06 Thread Bill Stewart

At 07:24 PM 01/03/2002 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Spare your breath. The only way to shut up someone with a mental condition
> > is to kick him off the list, to leave the list, or use filtering.
>
>Can't we just kick him: period?

What you do on your own time is your business :-)

Meanwhile, it's an open list, and procmail, Eudora, Outlook, Pine,
and probably even Netscape have mail filters,
so you can auto-ignore people you don't want to see.
Or you can encourage them by replying to all their posts,
so they'll keep on ranting.  Your choice

One of the helpful things Detweiler did was get us thinking
about the necessity for mail filters before the Spam wave hit
and before the September That Never Ended swamped Usenet,
though of course killfiles had been around for a decade or more.





Re: Future Gnu's

2002-01-06 Thread measl


On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Bill Stewart wrote:

> At 07:24 PM 01/03/2002 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Spare your breath. The only way to shut up someone with a mental condition
> > > is to kick him off the list, to leave the list, or use filtering.
> >
> >Can't we just kick him: period?
> 
> What you do on your own time is your business :-)
> 
> Meanwhile, it's an open list, 

Easy there Bill.  I specifically ignored the "suggestion" that he be "kicked
off the list".  If there's anything you should know by know, it's that such
a proposal would be *totally* out of character for me. 

> and procmail, Eudora, Outlook, Pine,
> and probably even Netscape have mail filters,
> so you can auto-ignore people you don't want to see.

Please note that (as I have stated a long time ago), procmail and mattd have
long since been acquainted ;-)

> Or you can encourage them by replying to all their posts,
> so they'll keep on ranting.  Your choice

Note that _I_ do not reply to his stuff, as I never see it directly.

To make a long story short Bill, what I *meant* was *exactly* what I said, no
more, and no less: "Can't we just kick him: period?".  The suggestion was to
implant a foot in his ass - literally.

-- 
Yours, 
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious consideration towards setting a better example:
Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of
unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in
the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and 
elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire
populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate...
This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States
as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers,
associates, or others.  Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of
those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the
first place...






Re: CDR: Re: Future Gnu's

2002-01-05 Thread measl


On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Petro wrote:

> On Thursday, January 3, 2002, at 05:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >
> >> Spare your breath. The only way to shut up someone with a mental 
> >> condition
> >> is to kick him off the list, to leave the list, or use filtering.
> >
> > Can't we just kick him: period?
> 
>   You mean physically?
> 
>   You mean *touch* him?
> 
>   Not with your Doc Martins!

Aw shit, you're right...  What a terrible thing to do to a shoe...


-- 
Yours, 
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious consideration towards setting a better example:
Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of
unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in
the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and 
elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire
populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate...
This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States
as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers,
associates, or others.  Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of
those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the
first place...






Re: Future Gnu's

2002-01-03 Thread Eugene Leitl

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Eric Cordian wrote:

> There is a critical mass of drek above which no one will bother
> searching for stuff worth reading in the list.  Without mentioning any
> names, might I suggest that certain prolific posters need to stop
> posting 15 badly formatted seemingly unintelligible messages every
> time they visit.

Spare your breath. The only way to shut up someone with a mental condition
is to kick him off the list, to leave the list, or use filtering. They're
entirely closed to rational argumentation.

People who have something to say are usually not that patient, and just
leave the list. Overpermissiveness results in quality loss.




Re: Future Gnu's

2002-01-03 Thread Eric Cordian

> Procmail is your friend :-)

> -- 
> Yours, 
> J.A. Terranson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is a critical mass of drek above which no one will bother searching
for stuff worth reading in the list.  Without mentioning any names, might
I suggest that certain prolific posters need to stop posting 15 badly
formatted seemingly unintelligible messages every time they visit.

Two or three badly formatted seemingly unintelligible messages might
actually be searched for meaningful content, but when I start seeing
screenfuls of message headers from the same person, I hit "delete" and try
again a few days later.

Odd stuff and spam doesn't need to be 95% of the list traffic.  

-- 
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"




Re: CDR: RE: Future Gnu's

2002-01-03 Thread measl


On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:

> If there's anything more annoying than a boring nut who takes
> up 30% of the list volume, it's a boring nut who takes up 30%
> of the list volume with plaigerized articles from other, much
> more creative and intelligent nuts.

Procmail is your friend :-)

-- 
Yours, 
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious consideration towards setting a better example:
Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of
unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in
the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and 
elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire
populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate...
This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States
as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers,
associates, or others.  Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of
those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the
first place...






RE: Future Gnu's

2002-01-03 Thread Trei, Peter

If there's anything more annoying than a boring nut who takes
up 30% of the list volume, it's a boring nut who takes up 30%
of the list volume with plaigerized articles from other, much
more creative and intelligent nuts.

This, of course, is CJ Parker's work, as published on Declan's
Politech list.

Peter Trei

> --
> From: mattd[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:47 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  Future Gnu's
> 
> Birthdays;Mel gibson,robert loggia and dabney coleman.Future Gnu's
> February 4, 2002
> 
> An 86 year-old Amish woman on a Florida to Ohio flight detonates a bomb
> in pants disguised as battery operated light-up "Viva Las Vegas!"
> panties. 
[...]






This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the addressee(s) and are PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  Access by any other party is unauthorized without the express
prior written permission of the sender.  If 
you have received this e-mail in error you may not copy, disclose to any
third party or use the contents, attachments or 
information in any way, Please delete all copies of the e-mail and the
attachment(s), if any and notify the sender. 
Thank You.