RE: Pentagon OSI.

2002-02-22 Thread Aimee Farr

Discussing the challenges of perception management by antagonists:

http://call.army.mil/fmso/fmsopubs/issues/manipult.htm
International Conflict Controllers: Manipulators or Manipulated?
Mr. Timothy L. Thomas
Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS.

Great bloodshedding that "never happened" -- due to diplomacy and deception.
War is the means, not the ends. Americans seem to confuse the two -- a Code
Duello Culture. The objective is to get the enemy to do our will. "The
enemy" is just an antagonistic interest, not "a country," as we have been
conditioned to think. That embodies a range of choices, but perception
management, even if it involves deception, should be preferred to battle. It
need not be justified by the actions of an adversary, it can be a virtuous
decision by itself.

Other countries have known resistance to occupation. Concepts deemed
treacherous (secrecy, deceit) became a cultural virtue. Our transition to a
resistance culture is nothing less than the key to our long-term survival.
(In WW II, our enemy held hands along railroads and we still blew them all
to heck.)

If the mind is the target, too many of us are occupied.

~Aimee




Re: Pentagon OSI.

2002-06-12 Thread Jim Choate


On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Aimee Farr wrote:

> Great bloodshedding that "never happened" -- due to diplomacy and deception.
> War is the means, not the ends.

No, it's diplomacy by other means. War is only one means, not 'the' means
as this would indicate.

> Americans seem to confuse the two -- a Code Duello Culture.

Well their political leaders do anyway. Not sure if it's consistent to
equate the American people with their leaders.

> The objective is to get the enemy to do our will.

There is usually no single objective. Further, if your goal is anything
other than peaceful co-existance any distinction between you and the enemy
is specious.

> "The enemy" is just an antagonistic interest, not "a country," as we have
>  been conditioned to think.

Specious distinction. The agent pursuing the 'antagonistic interest' is a
country in most cases (at least at the scale you are speaking of).

> That embodies a range of choices, but perception
> management, even if it involves deception, should be preferred to battle.

Yeah, it's called politics.

Stating the obvious again.


 --


  When I die, I would like to be born again as me.

Hugh Hefner
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ssz.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.open-forge.org