Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread ken
Tyler Durden wrote:
Sounds to me like Al-Qaeda is just getting the most mileage they can out 
of their little PR Event a couple of years ago. They don't even need to 
blow up anything to get the most bang for their buck.

Hell, in this story the biggest threat was the incompetence of the airline.
Assuming its true (*) the one security breach is the action of the 
 cabin crew member who tried to reassure this woman by going on 
about air marshalls.   That security breach should certainly get 
them sacked, and probably interrogated by the men in cheap suits.

Or does she assume that apparently nervous middle-aged 
middle-class white women can't be bombers?


(*)  (which it might be, US print journalistic standards are 
higher than our British ones - if I read this in a UK paper like 
the Dally Mail or the Sun I'd assume it was some rambling racist 
fantasy put ion as political propaganda - on the other hand our 
broadcast journalism is mostly better than yours, so there)



Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread Jim Dixon
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, ken wrote:

  Sounds to me like Al-Qaeda is just getting the most mileage they can out
  of their little PR Event a couple of years ago. They don't even need to
  blow up anything to get the most bang for their buck.
 
  Hell, in this story the biggest threat was the incompetence of the airline.

 Assuming its true (*) the one security breach is the action of the
   cabin crew member who tried to reassure this woman by going on
 about air marshalls.   That security breach should certainly get
 them sacked, and probably interrogated by the men in cheap suits.

 Or does she assume that apparently nervous middle-aged
 middle-class white women can't be bombers?


 (*)  (which it might be, US print journalistic standards are
 higher than our British ones - if I read this in a UK paper like
 the Dally Mail or the Sun I'd assume it was some rambling racist
 fantasy put ion as political propaganda - on the other hand our
 broadcast journalism is mostly better than yours, so there)

The article was reprinted in the News Review section of yesterday's
Sunday Times (which Americans seem to prefer calling the London
Times).

--
Jim Dixon  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   tel +44 117 982 0786  mobile +44 797 373 7881
http://jxcl.sourceforge.net   Java unit test coverage
http://xlattice.sourceforge.net p2p communications infrastructure



Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread Bill Stewart
At 03:52 AM 7/26/2004, ken wrote:
Assuming its true (*) the one security breach is the action of the  cabin 
crew member who tried to reassure this woman by going on about air 
marshalls.   That security breach should certainly get them sacked, and 
probably interrogated by the men in cheap suits.
Or does she assume that apparently nervous middle-aged middle-class white 
women can't be bombers?
The flight attendant didn't identify which six people were air marshals,
and since the normal number of them ranges from zero to two per flight,
she was almost certainly just lying to calm down the troublesome passenger
(who definitely had no class, middle or otherwise.)
One of the entertaining followup items from this event was that,
yes, the group of ~14 Syrian musicians were really just musicians on tour,
but in fact their visas had expired about 3 weeks earlier,
though the TSA thugs who interrogated them after they arrived
didn't notice it.
I was surprised they were musicians - I'd expected them to have
been a soccer team, and I've been on enough airplanes with
sports teams on them that their behavior sounds totally typical.
And Middle Easterners flying out of Detroit?  What a surprise!
(Detroit's one of the main places that Arab immigrants move.)
Anne Jacobsen, prejudiced white columnist, wrote
 What I experienced during that flight has caused me to question
 whether the United States of America
 can realistically uphold the civil liberties of every individual,
 even non-citizens, and protect its citizens from terrorist threats.
And she's obviously in favor of protection, whether or not it takes a
police state to do it.



Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread Jim Dixon
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, ken wrote:

  Sounds to me like Al-Qaeda is just getting the most mileage they can out
  of their little PR Event a couple of years ago. They don't even need to
  blow up anything to get the most bang for their buck.
 
  Hell, in this story the biggest threat was the incompetence of the airline.

 Assuming its true (*) the one security breach is the action of the
   cabin crew member who tried to reassure this woman by going on
 about air marshalls.   That security breach should certainly get
 them sacked, and probably interrogated by the men in cheap suits.

 Or does she assume that apparently nervous middle-aged
 middle-class white women can't be bombers?


 (*)  (which it might be, US print journalistic standards are
 higher than our British ones - if I read this in a UK paper like
 the Dally Mail or the Sun I'd assume it was some rambling racist
 fantasy put ion as political propaganda - on the other hand our
 broadcast journalism is mostly better than yours, so there)

The article was reprinted in the News Review section of yesterday's
Sunday Times (which Americans seem to prefer calling the London
Times).

--
Jim Dixon  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   tel +44 117 982 0786  mobile +44 797 373 7881
http://jxcl.sourceforge.net   Java unit test coverage
http://xlattice.sourceforge.net p2p communications infrastructure



Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread ken
Tyler Durden wrote:
Sounds to me like Al-Qaeda is just getting the most mileage they can out 
of their little PR Event a couple of years ago. They don't even need to 
blow up anything to get the most bang for their buck.

Hell, in this story the biggest threat was the incompetence of the airline.
Assuming its true (*) the one security breach is the action of the 
 cabin crew member who tried to reassure this woman by going on 
about air marshalls.   That security breach should certainly get 
them sacked, and probably interrogated by the men in cheap suits.

Or does she assume that apparently nervous middle-aged 
middle-class white women can't be bombers?


(*)  (which it might be, US print journalistic standards are 
higher than our British ones - if I read this in a UK paper like 
the Dally Mail or the Sun I'd assume it was some rambling racist 
fantasy put ion as political propaganda - on the other hand our 
broadcast journalism is mostly better than yours, so there)



Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread Bill Stewart
At 03:52 AM 7/26/2004, ken wrote:
Assuming its true (*) the one security breach is the action of the  cabin 
crew member who tried to reassure this woman by going on about air 
marshalls.   That security breach should certainly get them sacked, and 
probably interrogated by the men in cheap suits.
Or does she assume that apparently nervous middle-aged middle-class white 
women can't be bombers?
The flight attendant didn't identify which six people were air marshals,
and since the normal number of them ranges from zero to two per flight,
she was almost certainly just lying to calm down the troublesome passenger
(who definitely had no class, middle or otherwise.)
One of the entertaining followup items from this event was that,
yes, the group of ~14 Syrian musicians were really just musicians on tour,
but in fact their visas had expired about 3 weeks earlier,
though the TSA thugs who interrogated them after they arrived
didn't notice it.
I was surprised they were musicians - I'd expected them to have
been a soccer team, and I've been on enough airplanes with
sports teams on them that their behavior sounds totally typical.
And Middle Easterners flying out of Detroit?  What a surprise!
(Detroit's one of the main places that Arab immigrants move.)
Anne Jacobsen, prejudiced white columnist, wrote
 What I experienced during that flight has caused me to question
 whether the United States of America
 can realistically uphold the civil liberties of every individual,
 even non-citizens, and protect its citizens from terrorist threats.
And she's obviously in favor of protection, whether or not it takes a
police state to do it.



Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-17 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 02:19 PM 7/16/04 -0500, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
I don't quite know what to make of this.  Is it just paranoid rambling?


http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?titleid=1articleid=711



What I experienced during that
flight has caused me to question whether the United States of America
can realistically uphold the civil liberties of every individual, even
non-citizens, and protect its citizens from terrorist threats.


Ask the American citizens interned in California during WWII..







Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-17 Thread Tyler Durden
Sounds to me like Al-Qaeda is just getting the most mileage they can out of 
their little PR Event a couple of years ago. They don't even need to blow up 
anything to get the most bang for their buck.

Hell, in this story the biggest threat was the incompetence of the airline.
-TD


From: Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:36:21 -0700
At 02:19 PM 7/16/04 -0500, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
I don't quite know what to make of this.  Is it just paranoid rambling?

http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?titleid=1articleid=711

What I experienced during that
flight has caused me to question whether the United States of America
can realistically uphold the civil liberties of every individual, even
non-citizens, and protect its citizens from terrorist threats.

Ask the American citizens interned in California during WWII..


_
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/



Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-16 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 02:19 PM 7/16/04 -0500, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
I don't quite know what to make of this.  Is it just paranoid rambling?


http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?titleid=1articleid=711



What I experienced during that
flight has caused me to question whether the United States of America
can realistically uphold the civil liberties of every individual, even
non-citizens, and protect its citizens from terrorist threats.


Ask the American citizens interned in California during WWII..







Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-16 Thread Riad S. Wahby
I don't quite know what to make of this.  Is it just paranoid rambling?

http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?titleid=1articleid=711

Terror in the Skies, Again?
By Annie Jacobsen 

Note from the E-ditors: You are about to read an account of what
happened during a domestic flight that one of our writers, Annie
Jacobsen, took from Detroit to Los Angeles. The WWS Editorial Team
debated long and hard about how to handle this information and
ultimately we decided it was something that should be shared. What
does it have to do with finances? Nothing, and everything. Here is
Annie's  story.

On June 29, 2004, at 12:28 p.m., I flew on Northwest Airlines flight
#327 from Detroit to Los Angeles with my husband and our young son.
Also on our flight were 14 Middle Eastern men between the ages of
approximately 20 and 50 years old.  What I experienced during that
flight has caused me to question whether the United States of America
can realistically uphold the civil liberties of every individual, even
non-citizens, and protect its citizens from terrorist threats.

..

-- 
Riad S. Wahby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]