Re: Tim's Tips on Avoiding Prosecution

2001-09-05 Thread Steve Furlong

Declan wrote:

 ...I suspect that a should be killed line may be enough to garner
 a conviction if you knew or should have known that folks would act on
 what you say

No, no, he should be killed is just shorthand for he should be kill-
filed.

-- 
Steve FurlongComputer Condottiere   Have GNU, Will Travel
  617-670-3793

Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.




Re: Tim's Tips on Avoiding Prosecution

2001-09-01 Thread Tim May

On Friday, August 31, 2001, at 06:14 PM, David Honig wrote:

 At 10:41 AM 8/31/01 -0700, Tim May wrote:
 5. At physical Cypherpunks meetings, by all means talk about politics,
 uses of technology, even anarchic things. But avoid being drawn into
 debates about what to do to specific politicians, judges, etc..
 (Attendees at Bay Area meetings will know that for 9 years now we have
 had occasional heated discussions of these things, but we have avoided
 the kind of people's tribunal crap that helped get Bell into 
 trouble.)

 Maybe *that's* the reason for holding meatings at the SFPD.
 To keep everyone from naming future corpses.

I certainly would never attend a Cypherpunks meeting held at a police 
training facility!

A bizarre development in the history of Cypherpunks, that's for sure.

 However, a leader of Aryan Nation, for example, calling for his
 followers to kill Jews might cross the line (incitement). Their have
 been a few civil actions where the organization or its leaders were 
 held
 liable for damages caused by followers who were incited to _specific_
 actions.

 So kill David Berg might be incitement?  Hmm, he was a public figure.
 But  kill all Jews could easily be justified on religious grounds 
 -fatwas
 are protected speech.

Specificity matters. If someone with some ability to influence urges his 
followers to Kill Jews, and some of them begin to, expect an 
incitement (and perhaps conspiracy) charge to stick against the 
speaker. If someone mere opines that Jews should be killled, protected 
speech.



 After about 10 minutes of staring me down, they told me to walk to the
 closest point that was off campus and not to return. I asked about my
 car. If you are seen on campus, you will be arrested. You can get your
 car tomorrow. (Great, since I lived 60 miles away.)

 A fuck you would have been appropriate, but not in your
 rational self-interest.

I just said very little. When they asked me for ID, I said nothing. When 
they asked me for my name, I said nothing. When they said they wanted to 
search my bag, I said No.

 She said that students and faculty had all been dealing
 with the effects of Chelsea's arrival as a student and that the law
 school would be quite happy to handle my case if the SS or Stanford
 Sheriff's Dept. nabbed me.

 Sweet.

Didn't happen, though. No arrest.

Also no return gigs at her class...for whatever reason. If I recall the 
years right, it was in '95 that I first spoke, then in '97 when the 
incident occurred. We've had no contact since. Maybe I wasn't the 
speaker she wanted, maybe she'd heard enough from me, maybe my run-in 
with the Securitat was enough for her.

(And Larry Lessig is now at Stanford, so maybe he's taken over teaching 
the cyberlaw class.)


--TIm May




Tim's Tips on Avoiding Prosecution

2001-08-31 Thread Tim May

On Friday, August 31, 2001, at 07:10 AM, Fisher Mark wrote:

 Look at how AP was used.

 Mike, the main reason the Jim Bell prosecution started was his actions, 
 not
 his words.  Some of us on the list (myself included) would be majorly 
 upset
 if a stink bomb strong enough to make us vomit was used on us (upset 
 enough
 to want someone to take action against Jim Bell).  Had Jim Bell 
 restrained
 himself to speech, prosecution would have been much more difficult to 
 start.
 Not impossible, but much more difficult.

Bell's cases and Parker's case(s) have been thrashed-over many times 
here. Clueful folks like Duncan Frissell have outlined some of the 
obvious errors (acted as his own lawyer, admitted tampering with mail, 
the infamous Say goodnight, Joshua item, etc.).

I believe 10 years in prison is out of proportion. I have direct 
knowledge of far more serious crimes, including arson, which resulted in 
no prison time at all. Bell made various mistakes, but I'm not saying he 
deserves 10 years in a federal prison. And the handling of the case was 
strange. Others have written about it in a lot of detail.

Both the Bell and Parker cases involved identifiable actions that were 
not just speech actions.

(To JA Terrenson/Measle, there _is_ a difference between speech and 
action. Planting a stink bomb is not political speech. Tampering with 
mail is not speech. Threatening harm, directly and specifically, is not 
speech.)

I'll give you Tim's Tips on Avoiding Prosecution (worked so far...):

1. Never know the specific names of any judges or prosecutors. This cuts 
way down on the chance that one will slip up and make a comment which 
might be construed as a specific threat. Keep things general.

(I _do_ know the names of Jeff Gordon, Robb London, and Judge Tanner, 
but only because there have been so many articles and items about them.)

2. Never, ever, make physical contact with Feds. Don't go to their 
buildings unless required to, don't go near the homes or offices of 
their employees, just avoid them completely. This makes stalking 
charges mighty hard to press.

3. Don't attend People's Tribunals where specific agents, officers, 
judges, etc. are to be tried for their crimes. We see that many/most 
of these are infiltrated, and that, in fact, the chief rabble-rousers 
are likely to be government agents or stool pigeons. (Some may be acting 
to reduce other charges against them, as the Feds wanted Randy Weaver to 
do--they set Weaver up with that quarter inch taken off a shotgun and 
then wanted him to infiltrate the Northwest militias and narc them out.)

4. If whackos send you e-mail, don't respond. (I routinely discarded 
e-mail from Vulis, Detweiler, Toto, Bell, and others I won't name for 
reasons of politeness. Some of them sent me what I thought were side 
channel communications which looked to be efforts to rope me into their 
plans. Perhaps the lack of correspondence with Parker and Bell is what 
saved me from being dragged in front of a grand jury.)

5. At physical Cypherpunks meetings, by all means talk about politics, 
uses of technology, even anarchic things. But avoid being drawn into 
debates about what to do to specific politicians, judges, etc.. 
(Attendees at Bay Area meetings will know that for 9 years now we have 
had occasional heated discussions of these things, but we have avoided 
the kind of people's tribunal crap that helped get Bell into trouble.)

6. Don't actually build bombs or modify weapons to fire in illegal ways. 
These are actions, not speech. And neither are very useful. Perfectly 
OK to talk about either thing (maybe not on the Cypherpunks list, for 
reasons of relevancy), but may well be illegal to actually build.  (It 
is not necessarily illegal to build bombs, but the specifics matter. One 
of the pyrotechnics newsgroups has discussions of this.)

7. Pay your taxes. Stay away from nutty schemes to not file tax returns, 
etc. (Part of what got Bell charged the first time was failure to file, 
fraudulent use of Social Security numbers, etc.) Arguing that taxes are 
wrong, unfair, etc. is not the same thing as tax evasion. Even promoting 
schemes to avoid taxes is probably not prosecutable (note that the book 
writers usually only spend time at Terminal Island when they themselves 
have used their ideas to evade taxes.).

8. Speech in purely electronic or written form is safer than speech in 
physical forums. More time to redact words, more ability to modify 
speech which might be interpreted as direct threats to a person. Less 
chance to be entrapped by a provocateur.

See Rule 1: Never bother to learn the names of agents or judges. This 
makes it much harder to slip up and say something foolish like We 
should use AP to eliminate Judge Foobar! OK to say I won't weep if 
Washington, D.C. is nerve-gassed by Osama bin Laden, as this is an 
expression of opinion. Ditto for Shoot all politicians (a general 
comment, overbroad, not specific, not credible

Re: CDR: Tim's Tips on Avoiding Prosecution

2001-08-31 Thread Jim Choate


On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Tim May wrote:

 By the way, the SS also demanded that I give them my name and show them 
 my driver's license. I refused, so at least they never got my name 
 entered into the Master Data Bank of Presidential Threateners.

There is this device called a camera...


 --


natsugusa ya...tsuwamonodomo ga...yume no ato
summer grass...those mighty warriors'...dream-tracks

Matsuo Basho

   The Armadillo Group   ,::;::-.  James Choate
   Austin, Tx   /:'/ ``::/|/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.ssz.com.',  `/( e\  512-451-7087
   -~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-