Re: the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-22 Thread James A. Donald
--
On 20 Dec 2003 at 13:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 There's a video interview I saw about all of this on 60
 minutes (I think) where it was made clear that Glaspie did in
 fact say to Saddam that We have no opinion on your Arab -
 Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait.

And, as diplomats tend to do, she also proceeded to imply the
opposite.

In any case, you are making the poor victimized Saddam
argument  When one hears this argument in any particular case,
one does not need to check the facts of that particular case. 
That poor little Saddam was victimized is an obviously stupid
argument, and anyone making it an obviously evil person.

--digsig
 James A. Donald
 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
 6WGBV4YgV3ERm+ANnc1R5PyBtJd1N+U/T6s1mBLK
 4HFuMQjPp6w0HFllkQpbmhad5CnhaAWYf7P9QsMvn



the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-20 Thread Nomen Nescio
Thanks Steve, I don't think I have heard this before. I googled on the text you quoted 
and found this url

http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_andambassaprilglaspie22303.html

and a few more

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html
http://www.chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/glaspie.html

I don't know what to say. This makes me sick to my stomach.

I guess one way of lookin at this is that U.S. played dirty and deceiving.
U.S. is more or less the reason Iraq invaded Kuwait.

I guess this is not told on Fox news.



Re: the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-20 Thread James A. Donald


On 20 Dec 2003 at 12:40, Nomen Nescio wrote:

 
 Thanks Steve, I don't think I have heard this before. I googled on the
 text you quoted and found this url
 
 http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_andambassaprilglaspie22303.html
 
 and a few more
 
 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html
 http://www.chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/glaspie.html
 
 I don't know what to say. This makes me sick to my stomach.
 
 I guess one way of lookin at this is that U.S. played dirty and
 deceiving. U.S. is more or less the reason Iraq invaded Kuwait.
 
 I guess this is not told on Fox news.
 

I see you did not actually read 
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html;

There are two versions of Glaspie's conversation.  One believable, 
one unbelievable.  One of which tells Saddam that the US is deeply 
concerned about Saddam invading, implicitly threatening him while 
explicitly denying any threat, one of which gives the green light for 
invasion.

One definitely gives the green light.  The other can be read as 
giving the green light, but would not be so read by anyone who wanted 
to stay alive.

Needless to say, one version comes from more credible sources than 
the other.




Re: the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-20 Thread Freematt357
I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history, but that isn't what Glaspie said.

There's a video interview I saw about all of this on 60 minutes (I think) where it was made clear that Glaspie did in fact say to Saddam that "We have no opinion on your Arab - Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait."

Regards, Matt-







Re: the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-20 Thread Michael Kalus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On 20-Dec-03, at 1:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history, 
 but that
 isn't what Glaspie said.


I am guessing here that he just wants to believe that the US is acting 
in their foreign policy for the greater good, not for some selfish 
reasons.

Nagging Conscience maybe?

M.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBP+Sg12lCnxcrW2uuEQIzawCgtpmGBBy4B3f+nrbVWXQ0eo6HlFIAoJ/6
L6YIZYQbQhuuv1kcM/WgomLX
=u4/h
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-20 Thread James A. Donald
--
On 20 Dec 2003 at 13:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 There's a video interview I saw about all of this on 60
 minutes (I think) where it was made clear that Glaspie did in
 fact say to Saddam that We have no opinion on your Arab -
 Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait.

And, as diplomats tend to do, she also proceeded to imply the
opposite.

In any case, you are making the poor victimized Saddam
argument  When one hears this argument in any particular case,
one does not need to check the facts of that particular case. 
That poor little Saddam was victimized is an obviously stupid
argument, and anyone making it an obviously evil person.

--digsig
 James A. Donald
 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
 6WGBV4YgV3ERm+ANnc1R5PyBtJd1N+U/T6s1mBLK
 4HFuMQjPp6w0HFllkQpbmhad5CnhaAWYf7P9QsMvn



Re: the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-20 Thread James A. Donald


On 20 Dec 2003 at 12:40, Nomen Nescio wrote:

 
 Thanks Steve, I don't think I have heard this before. I googled on the
 text you quoted and found this url
 
 http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_andambassaprilglaspie22303.html
 
 and a few more
 
 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html
 http://www.chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/glaspie.html
 
 I don't know what to say. This makes me sick to my stomach.
 
 I guess one way of lookin at this is that U.S. played dirty and
 deceiving. U.S. is more or less the reason Iraq invaded Kuwait.
 
 I guess this is not told on Fox news.
 

I see you did not actually read 
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html;

There are two versions of Glaspie's conversation.  One believable, 
one unbelievable.  One of which tells Saddam that the US is deeply 
concerned about Saddam invading, implicitly threatening him while 
explicitly denying any threat, one of which gives the green light for 
invasion.

One definitely gives the green light.  The other can be read as 
giving the green light, but would not be so read by anyone who wanted 
to stay alive.

Needless to say, one version comes from more credible sources than 
the other.




Re: the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-20 Thread Michael Kalus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On 20-Dec-03, at 1:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history, 
 but that
 isn't what Glaspie said.


I am guessing here that he just wants to believe that the US is acting 
in their foreign policy for the greater good, not for some selfish 
reasons.

Nagging Conscience maybe?

M.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBP+Sg12lCnxcrW2uuEQIzawCgtpmGBBy4B3f+nrbVWXQ0eo6HlFIAoJ/6
L6YIZYQbQhuuv1kcM/WgomLX
=u4/h
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-20 Thread Freematt357
I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history, but that isn't what Glaspie said.

There's a video interview I saw about all of this on 60 minutes (I think) where it was made clear that Glaspie did in fact say to Saddam that "We have no opinion on your Arab - Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait."

Regards, Matt-







the Kuwait issue is not associated with America

2003-12-20 Thread Nomen Nescio
Thanks Steve, I don't think I have heard this before. I googled on the text you quoted 
and found this url

http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_andambassaprilglaspie22303.html

and a few more

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html
http://www.chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/glaspie.html

I don't know what to say. This makes me sick to my stomach.

I guess one way of lookin at this is that U.S. played dirty and deceiving.
U.S. is more or less the reason Iraq invaded Kuwait.

I guess this is not told on Fox news.