this is how it may start...(not the t.may way)
re - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/3415525.stm All elements are there. Pretty much like situation when segregation in US collapsed. A nonsensical security ritual. Legal framework where few words can set one up for 15 years in prison. Obvious idiocy of it all. And the government's authority is hinged on it. The massive I have a bomb declarations at airport security checks is probably the only thing that can bring down US government today. They can't arrest us all.
1st amend, compelled speech in US
..public health officials are considering legal action to force AOL and certain websites to warn members about... http://wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,62005,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2 Compelled speech is prohibited, suggesting it is treason, no matter the reason.
Re: 1st amend, compelled speech in US
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:47:07AM -0800, Major Variola (ret.) wrote: ...public health officials are considering legal action to force AOL and certain websites to warn members about... http://wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,62005,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2 Compelled speech is prohibited, suggesting it is treason, no matter the reason. So is it prohibited that drug companies are compelled to disclose known side effects of their medications in order to sell them, and treason on the part of FDA employees who enforce that?
Re: 1st amend, compelled speech in US
At 09:47 AM 1/22/04 -0800, Major Variola (ret.) wrote: ..public health officials are considering legal action to force AOL and certain websites to warn members about... http://wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,62005,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2 Yep. Because if watching a whole generation of terrifying death rates among gay men doesn't convince you to take some precautions to avoid getting AIDS, a banner ad on AOL is probably going to do the trick. Compelled speech is prohibited, suggesting it is treason, no matter the reason. Not treason. Not even unconstitutional if they're planning to sue to try to force AOL to put up some condom ads, though I can't see how they'd win in court. Just really stupid policy. --John Kelsey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP: FA48 3237 9AD5 30AC EEDD BBC8 2A80 6948 4CAA F259