no photography, no questions, no rights

2004-03-25 Thread Major Variola (ret.)
LOS ANGELES (AP) -- On the eve of grand jury proceedings in the Michael
Jackson molestation case, the presiding judge of the Santa Barbara
courts barred pictures or communication with any prospective or final
panelists, or grand jury witnesses.

Superior Court Judge Clifford R. Anderson III did not mention Jackson's
name in his order Wednesday, but acknowledged a grand jury summoned this
week has created significant media and public interest.

The order threatens to hold in contempt anyone who communicates with a
juror, prospective grand juror or witness - or reveals secret testimony.
It also prohibits photography of jurors or prospective jurors entering
and exiting the courthouse and any other facility or property utilized
by the grand jury.

Media lawyers immediately protested, calling the order overbroad and
unconstitutional prohibition of activity protected under the First
Amendment and California law. They said the courthouse and its environs
have long been recognized as a public forum.

I've not seen an order so broad and so sweeping, said attorney
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., who represents several media organizations
including The Associated Press.

snip
http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CA_MICHAEL_JACKSON_CAOL-?SITE=CAANRSECTION=STATE

---

In the Brinworld of Phonecams this is a nice challenge for the
freelancer...
Fuck you, Anderson III



corporate vs. state, TD's education

2004-03-25 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 10:26 AM 3/25/04 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
I also think that some cypherpunks mistake the Corporate State for what
has
been described as Crypto-Anarchy.

Get this through your head: a corporation can't initiate force against
you.
You may not like their product, practices, or price, but no one is
coercing you at gunpoint.

The state, on the other hand, is entirely based on coercion.

If you can't appreciate this, you'll be hopelessly inconsistant.

PS: you are a corporation, I am a corporation, together we could
be a corporation, with 100K others we could be too.  Doesn't
matter; all have the same rights to act, and be left alone.


In fact, it's easy to argue that the
current Oil Crusade in Iraq is precisely for the purpose of protecting
a set
of dinosaur industries in the US. That's not the kind of capitalism I
think
most Cypherpunks espouse.

The state can legitimately only use taxpayers' armies to defend citizens
in the
country, not other countries, not its perceived-by-some self-interest,
not
corporations.  All the oil colonialism is illegitimate for that reason,
as well
as illegal as Congress has not declared war.





Mac OS X XGrid, anyone?

2004-03-25 Thread R. A. Hettinga
I downloaded XGrid yesterday, fired it up here, and noticed that, among
other grid computing demo projects, it does factoring. :-).

Anyone out there want to play around with this, just to see how it works?

Contact me directly.

, BreadPudding

Cheers,
RAH

Cheers,
RAH

-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'



RE: corporate vs. state, TD's education

2004-03-25 Thread Tyler Durden
Ah Variola...do I detect a wee bit of Knee-jerk in your otherwise 
consistently iconoclastic views? Let's take a looksee...

Get this through your head: a corporation can't initiate force against
you.
You may not like their product, practices, or price, but no one is
coercing you at gunpoint.
Think I'm gonna have to disagree with ya' hear partner.
For one, in the old days Corporations regularly hired goons to mow down 
striking coalminers and whatnot.

OK, those days are all gone, right? Wrong. Halliburton and Bechtel have both 
hired mercs for their Iraq operations. (In fact, I was on a call a couple of 
weeks ago where a Halliburton official was describing the casualties they 
take on a regular basis. These don't get reported much in the news, though, 
for obvious reason...)

However, a corporation doesn't actually have to hire the goons these days in 
order to get the job done, not when it's much cheaper to call upon the 
publically-available pool of goons that function as a government in some 
places. The fact that some corporations may leverage existing thuggery to 
get their job done doesn't make them any less complicit. But this is all 
besides my main point...


PS: you are a corporation, I am a corporation, together we could
be a corporation, with 100K others we could be too.  Doesn't
matter; all have the same rights to act, and be left alone.
Well, this is where I suspect a little knee-jerk. I'm no socialist: in no 
way am I saying that Corporations are inherently evil. (In fact, I'm 
hoping to continue profiting admirably as the result of my participation in 
the capitalist system.) What I think bares investigation is whether or not, 
here in the US, a subset of the big corporations are so tied in with the 
political engine as to be complicit in the violations we both agree are 
occurring.

As Max said so eloquently, this is not to imply that we should make some 
laws and eliminate these big evil corporations. Or maybe it is (I 
dunno...I'm a stoopid Cypherpunk...). But I don't think it's inherently 
inconsistent to point out that there may be a direct correlation between the 
activities of our particular State and the interests of a subset of Large, 
Old-money-dominated US Coporations.

-TD







In fact, it's easy to argue that the
current Oil Crusade in Iraq is precisely for the purpose of protecting
a set
of dinosaur industries in the US. That's not the kind of capitalism I
think
most Cypherpunks espouse.
The state can legitimately only use taxpayers' armies to defend citizens
in the
country, not other countries, not its perceived-by-some self-interest,
not
corporations.  All the oil colonialism is illegitimate for that reason,
as well
as illegal as Congress has not declared war.


_
Get reliable access on MSN 9 Dial-up. 3 months for the price of 1! 
(Limited-time offer) 
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialuppgmarket=en-usST=1/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/