/. [Dissidents Seeking Anonymous Web Solutions?]
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/13/0250226 Posted by: Cliff, on 2005-05-13 19:38:00 from the browsing-without-regard-for-politics dept. [1]DocMurphy asks: I'm working with some dissidents who are looking for ways to use the Internet from within repressive regimes. Many have in-home Internet access, but think it too risky to participate in pro-freedom activities on home PCs. Internet cafés are also available, but although fairly anonymous, every machine may be infected with keystroke loggers that give governments access to and knowledge of 'banned' sites. Dissidents not only want to remain anonymous themselves, but also wish to not compromise the sites they access. Any suggestions for products/procedures/systems out there making anonymous access publishing a reality under repressive regime run Internet access? References 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - End forwarded message - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: /. [Dissidents Seeking Anonymous Web Solutions?]
I told him to how to find his answers and to try finding us. Let's hope he's actually motivated. -- Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten 5813 E 64 PL TULSA OK 74136 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 857-891-7585 Eugen: oops
Re: your mail
On Mon, 16 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote: Did I miss some development or why exactly does cypherpunks care about a release candidate of libevent (or Wolfram's New Kind of Science for that matter)? Was I frozen for that long? Well, lets see. I suppose I could answer either way: Yes, we care, and no we don't. They are both true. Note that I am not trying to be a bitch or troll, but I am on this mailing list to follow the hacker culture Then what the fuck are you doing *here*? and developments in privacy issues and Internet technology, not to learn about all kinds of tangential announcements. Then you are in the wrong fucking place buddy. This is cpunks: Information wants to be free and all that. Anything is postable, nothing turned away, even trolls like you are welcome additions. Could someone bring me up to speed, please? Done. This is not flamebait. Really not. Then maybe you should reconsider where you hang your virtual hat a little more carefully in the future. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xBD4A95BF That bitch needs to learn proper Road Rage Etiquitte. Never give up. Me on 14 April 05, on I270, doing about 90mph and realizing the girl I had been toying with for the last 20 miles had decided safer was better than.
Re: your mail
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 15:07 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: This is the sixth release candidate for the 0.1.0.x series. This is an Did I miss some development or why exactly does cypherpunks care about a release candidate of libevent (or Wolfram's New Kind of Science for that matter)? Was I frozen for that long? This is actually a release announcement for Tor 0.1.0.0-rc6 that was not labeled as such, posted through the randseed Mixmaster remailer. To the schmuck that posted the original: make it clearer next time, with a clear subject line. -- Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: your mail
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.16.1924 +0200]: Interesting... this is not how I remembered it. ... I had been subscribed to the moderated minder.net list in the past... this explains :) Again, sorry, also for the noise. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^.*|tr * mailto:; [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED] if i am occasionally a little overdressed, i make up for it by being always immensely over-educated. -- oscar wilde signature.asc Description: Digital signature
